skip to main content
10.1145/1978942.1979066acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Acquiring and pointing: an empirical study of pen-tilt-based interaction

Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Research literature has shown that pen tilt is a promising input modality in pen-based interaction. However, the human capability to control pen tilt has not been fully evaluated. This paper systematically investigates the human ability to perform discrete target selection tasks by varying the stylus' tilt angle through two controlled experiments: pen tilt target acquiring (Experiment 1) and tilt pointing (Experiment 2). Results revealed a decreasing power relationship between angular width and selection time in Experiment 1. The results of Experiment 2 confirmed that pen tilt pointing can be modeled by Fitts' law. Based on our quantitative analysis, we discuss the human ability to control pen tilt and the implications of pen tilt use. We also propose a taxonomy of pen tilt based interaction techniques and showcase a series of possible pen tilt technique designs.

References

  1. Bartlett, J.F. (2000). Rock n' scroll is here to stay. IEEE Computer. Graphics and Applications. 20(3), 40--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bi, X., Moscovich, T., Ramos, G., Balakrishnan, R. and Hinckley, K. (2008). An exploration of pen rolling for pen-based interaction, Proc. UIST, 191--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Blaskó, G., Beaver, W., Kamvar, M. and Feiner, S. (2004). Workplane-orientation sensing techniques for tablet PCs, Proc. UIST, 24--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bridson, R. (2009) SpikeNav: using stylus tilt in three-dimensional navigation, ACM UIST Poster Sessio.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eissele, M., Stegmaier, S., Weiskopf, D. and Ertl, T. (2004). Orientation as an additional user interface in mixed-reality environments. Workshop GI-Fachgruppe AR/VR, 79--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fishkin, K.P., Moran, T.P. and Harrison, B.L. (1998). Embodied user interfaces: towards invisible user interfaces. Proc. EHCI, 1--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 47, 381--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Fitzmaurice, G.W., Balakrishnan, R., Kurtenbach, G. and Buxton, B. (1999). An exploration into supporting artwork orientation in the user interface. Proc. CHI, 167--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fitzmaurice, G.W., Zhai, S. and Chignell, M.H. (1993). Virtual reality for palmtop computers. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 11(3), 197--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Guiard, Y. and Ferrand, T. (1987). Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19(4), 486--517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 1Harrison, B.L., Fishkin, K.P., Gujar, A., Mochon, C. and Want, R. (1998). Squeeze me, hold me, tilt me! an exploration of manipulative user interfaces. Proc. CHI, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hinckley, K., Baudisch, P., Ramos, G. and Guimbretiere, F. (2005). Design and analysis of delimiters for selection-action pen gesture phrases in scriboli. Proc. CHI, 451--460. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hinckley, K., Pierce, J., Sinclair, M. and Horvitz, E. (2000). Sensing techniques for mobile interaction. Proc. UIST, 91--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kabbash, P., Buxton, W. and Sellen, A.G. (1994). Two-handed input in a compound task. Proc. CHI, 417--423. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Krishnan, S.N. and Moriya, S. (1996). One stroke operations: a new pen-based user interface that can integrate or separate operand specification, menu opening and selection, and action execution, in one or more strokes. Information Processing Society of Japan, 37(12), 2419--2437.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kristensson, P.-O. and Zhai, S. (2004). SHARK2: a large vocabulary shorthand writing system for pen-based computers. Proc. UIST, 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kuroki, T. and Kawai, S. (1999). An interface technology for pen devices using tilt information. Proc. Interactive Systems and Software VII, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kurtenbach, G. and Buxton, W. (1993). The limits of expert performance using hierarchical marking menus. Proc. CHI, 35--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Leitner, J., Powell, J., Brandl, P., Seifried, T., Haller, M., Dorray, B. and To, P. (2009). Flux: a tilting multi-touch and pen based surface. Proc. CHI EA, 3211--3216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lin, J., Newman, M.W., Hong, J.I. and Landay, J.A. (2000). DENIM: finding a tighter fit between tools and practice for Web site design. Proc. CHI, 510--517. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 2Oshita M. (2004). Pen-to-mime: a pen-based interface for interactive control of a human figure. EUROGRAPHICS workshop on sketch-based interfaces and modeling, 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 2Partridge, K., Chatterjee, S., Sazawal, V., Borriello, G. and Want, R. (2002). TiltType: accelerometer-supported ext entry for very small devices. Proc. UIST, 201--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rahman, M., Gustafson, S., Irani, P. and Subramanian, S. (2009). Tilt techniques: investigating the dexterity of wrist-based input. Proc. CHI, 1943--1952. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ramos, G., Boulos, M. and Balakrishnan, R. (2004). Pressure Widgets. Proc. CHI, 487--494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Rekimoto, J. (1996). Tilting operations for small screen interfaces. Proc. UIST, 167--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Rekimoto, J. and Sciammarella, E. (2000). ToolStone: effective use of the physical manipulation vocabularies of input devices. Proc. UIST, 109--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ren, X. and Moriya, S. (2000). Improving selection performance on pen-based systems: a study of pen-input interaction for selection tasks. ToCHI, 7(3), 384--416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sazawal, V., Want, R. and Borriello, G. (2002). The unigesture approach. one-handed text entry for small devices. Proc. MobileHCI, 256--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Shi, K., Irani, P., Gustafson, S. and Subramanian, S. (2008). PressureFish: a method to improve control of discrete pressure-based input. Proc. CHI, 1295--1298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Small, D. and Ishii, H. (1997). Design of spatially aware graspable displays. Proc. CHI, 367--368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. 3Szalavári, Z. and Gervautz, M. (1997). The Personal Interaction Panel - a Two-Handed Interface for Augmented Reality. Computer Graphics Forum, 16(3), 335--346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. 3Tian, F., Ao, X., Wang, H., Setlur, V. and Dai, G. (2007). The tilt cursor: enhancing stimulus-response compatibility by providing 3D orientation cue of pen. Proc. CHI, 303--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. 3Tian, F., Xu, L., Wang, H., Zhang, X., Liu, Y., Setlur, V. and Dai, G. (2008). Tilt menu: using the 3D orientation information of pen devices to extend the selection capability of pen-based user interfaces. Proc. CHI, 1371--1380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Wigdor, D. and Balakrishnan, R. (2003). TiltText: using tilt for text input to mobile phones. Proc. UIST, 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Xin, Y. and Ren, X. (2010). An investigation of adaptive pen pressure discretization method based on personal pen pressure use profile, IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E93-D(5), 1205--1213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Zhou, X. and Ren, X. (2009). A comparison of pressure and tilt input techniques for cursor control, IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E92-D(9), 1683--1691..Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Acquiring and pointing: an empirical study of pen-tilt-based interaction
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2011
      3530 pages
      ISBN:9781450302289
      DOI:10.1145/1978942

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '11 Paper Acceptance Rate410of1,532submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader