skip to main content
10.1145/1978942.1979226acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Zero-fidelity simulation of fire emergency response: improving team coordination learning

Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Fire emergency responders rely on team coordination to survive and succeed in high-stress environments, but traditional education does not directly teach these essential skills. Prior simulations seek the highest possible fidelity, employing resources to capture concrete characteristics of operating environments. We take a different tack, hypothesizing that a zero-fidelity approach, focusing on human-centered aspects of work practice, will improve team coordination learning. Such an approach promotes simulation focus by developing an alternative environment that stimulates participants to engage in distributed cognition. The costs of simulation development are reduced.

To supplement preparation for burn training exercises, 28 fire emergency response students played the Teaching Team Coordination game (T2eC), a zero-fidelity simulation of the distributed cognition of fire emergency response work practice. To test our hypothesis, we develop quantitative evaluation methods for impact on team coordination learning through measures of communication efficiency and cooperative activity. Results show that participants improve cooperation, become more efficient communicators, differentiate team roles through communication, and leverage multiple communication modalities. Given the context of the study amidst the educational process, qualitative data from the students and their expert instructor supports the ecological validity of the contribution of the T2eC zero-fidelity simulation to fire emergency response education.

References

  1. Beaubien, J. M., Parker, D. P. The use of simulation for training teamwork skills in health care: How low can you go? Qual. Saf. Health Care 13 (2004), i51--i56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., Converse, S. Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In Individual and Group Decision Making: Current Issues, N. J. Castellan, Jr., Ed. Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1993, 221--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ellington, H. A Handbook of Game Design. Kogan Page, London, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Endsley, M. R. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37, 1 (1995), 32--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Entin, E. E., Serfaty, D. Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors 41, 2 (1999), 312--325.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Ericsson, K. A., Simon, H. A. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, revised ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gagné, R. M. Training devices and simulators: Some research issues. Am. Psychol. 9, 3 (1954), 95--107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gentner, D., Stevens, A. L. Mental Models. Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Granlund, R., Johansson, B., Persson, M. C3Fire: A micro-world for collaboration training in the ROLF environment. In Proc. Simulation and Modelling, Simulation Theory and Practice (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamilton, W. A., Toups Dugas, P. O., Kerne, A. Synchronized communication and coordinated views: Qualitative data discovery for team game user studies. In Ext. Abs. ACM CHI (2009), 4573--4578. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hays, R. T., Singer, M. J. Simulation Fidelity in Training System Design: Bridging the Gap Between Reality and Training. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jiang, X., Hong, J. I., Takayama, L. A., Landay, J. A. Ubiquitous computing for firefighters: Field studies and prototypes of large displays for incident command. In Proc. ACM CHI (2004), 679--686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kleinman, D. L., Serfaty, D. Team performance assessment in distributed decisionmaking. In Proc. Interactive Networked Sim. for Training (1989), 22--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Landgren, J. Making action visible in time-critical work. In Proc. ACM CHI (2006), 201--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lave, J., Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. MacMillan, J., Entin, E. E., Serfaty, D. Communication overhead: The hidden cost of team cognition. In Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors that Drive Process and Performance, E. Salas, S. M. Fiore, Eds. Amer. Psychological Assn., Wash., DC, 2004, 61--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Malone, T. W. Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Sci. 5, 4 (1981), 333--369.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Mathieu, J. E., Goodwin, G. F., Heffner, T. S., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 85, 2 (2000), 273--283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Narayanasamy, V., Wong, K. W., Fung, C. C., Rai, S. Distinguishing games and simulation games from simulators. ACM CIE 4, 2 (2006), 1--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. National Incident Management System. U.S. Dept. Homeland Security, Wash., DC, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Reder, L., Klatzky, R. L. Transfer: Training for performance. In Learning, Remembering, Believing: Enhancing Human Performance, D. Druckman, R. A. Bjork, Eds. Nat'l. Acad., Wash., DC, 1994, 25--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Salen, K., Zimmerman, E. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Schechner, R. Between Theater and Anthropology. Univ. Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Serfaty, D. E., Entin, E. E., Volpe, C. Adaptation to stress in team decision-making and coordination. In Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Soc. (1993), 1228--1233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Small, S. D., Wuerz, R. C., Simon, R., Shapiro, N., Conn, A., Setnick, G. Demonstration of a high-fidelity simulation team training for emergency medicine. Simulation Training 6, 4 (1999), 312--323.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Thorndike, E. L., Woodworth, R. S. The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions (I). Psychol. Rev., 8 (1901), 247--261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Toups Dugas, P. O., Kerne, A. Implicit coordination in firefighting practice: Design implications for teaching fire emergency responders. In Proc. CHI (2007), 707--716. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Toups Dugas, P. O., Kerne, A., Hamilton, W. Game design principles for engaging cooperative play: Core mechanics and interfaces for non-mimetic simulation of fire emergency response. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH Video Games (2009), 71--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Toups Dugas, P. O., Kerne, A., Hamilton, W., Blevins, A. Emergent team coordination: From fire emergency response practice to a non-mimetic simulation game. In Proc. ACM GROUP (2009), 341--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Trnka, J., Granlund, H., Granlund, R. Using low-fidelity simulations to support design of decision-support systems for command and control applications. In Proc. Distributed Media Systems (2008), 158--163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Welch, B. L. The generalization of the "Student's"? problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34, 1--2 (1947), 28--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Zero-fidelity simulation of fire emergency response: improving team coordination learning
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
              May 2011
              3530 pages
              ISBN:9781450302289
              DOI:10.1145/1978942

              Copyright © 2011 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 7 May 2011

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              CHI '11 Paper Acceptance Rate410of1,532submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

              Upcoming Conference

              CHI '24
              CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
              May 11 - 16, 2024
              Honolulu , HI , USA

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader