skip to main content
10.1145/1979742.1979855acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Engaging energy saving through motivation-specific social comparison

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Comparison is widely used in research projects and commercial products whose goal is to motivate energy saving at home. This research builds on fundamental theories from social psychology in an attempt to shed light on how to motivate consumers to conserve energy by providing relevant people for social comparison depending on consumer's motivation to compare. To support the research process, the mobile application EnergyWiz was developed through a theory-driven design approach. Along with other features EnergyWiz provides users with three types of social comparison - normative, one-on-one and ranking. The results of interviews with prospective users are used to derive design suggestions for relevant people for comparison (comparison subjects).

References

  1. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C. and Rothengatter, T. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25, 3 (2005), 273--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Card, S. K. Theory-Driven Design Research. Plenum, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Darby, S. The Effectiveness of Feedback on Energy Consumption: A review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing, and direct displays. Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. DEWHA. Energy Use: In the Australian residential sector 1986 - 2020. Commonwealth of Australia, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Festinger, L. A Theory of Social Comparison Process. Human Relations 7, 2 (1954), 117--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Fogg, B. J. Mass Interpersonal Persuasion: An Early View of a New Phenomenon. In LNCS 5033, Springer (2008), 23--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fogg, B. J. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Foster, D., Lawson, S., Blythe, M. and Cairns, P. Wattsup?: Motivating reductions in domestic energy consumption using social networks. In Proc. NordiCHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 178--187. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Froehlich, J. Promoting Energy Efficient Behaviors in the Home through Feedback: The Role of Human-Computer Interaction. University of Washington, Seattle, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Froehlich, J. The Design of Eco-Feedback Technology. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1999--2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B. and Griskevicius, V. A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels. Journal of Consumer Research 35, 3 (2008), 472--482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. He, H. A., Greenberg, S. and Huang, E. M. One size does not fit all: Applying the Transtheoretical Model to Energy Feedback Technology Design. Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. IPCC IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), 2007. http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-wg1.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mankoff, J., Fussell, S. R., Dillahunt, T., Glaves, R., Grevet, C., Johnson, M., Matthews, D., Matthews, H. S., McGuire, R., Thompson, R., Shick, A. and Setlock, L. StepGreen.org: Increasing Energy Saving Behaviors via Social Networks. In Proc. of AAAI 2010 on Weblogs and Social Media, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Petersen, J. E., Shunturov, V., Janda, K., Platt, G. and Weinberger, K. Dormitory residents reduce electricity consumption when exposed to real-time visual feedback and incentives. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 8, 1 (2007), 16--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J. and Griskevicius, V. The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms. Psychological Science 18, 5 (2007), 429--434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Siero, F. W., Bakker, A. B., Dekker, G. B. and van den Burg, M. T. C. Changing Organizational Energy Consumption Behaviour Through Comparative Feedback. Journal of Environmental Psychology 16, 3 (1996), 235--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Suls, J., Martin, R. and Wheeler, L. Social Comparison: Why, With Whom, and With What Effect? Current Directions. Psychological Science 11, 5 (2002), 159--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Wheeler, L., Martin, R. and Suls, J. The Proxy social comparison model for self-assessment of ability. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1, 1 (1997), 54--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Engaging energy saving through motivation-specific social comparison

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader