ABSTRACT
Accumulating evidence suggests evolution and ecology can happen on similar time scales. Coevolution between hosts and parasites is a practical example of interacting ecological and evolutionary dynamics. Antagonistic interactions theoretically and experimentally increase host diversity, but the contribution of novel variation to diversity is not well understood. In laboratory or natural settings it is infeasible to prohibit novel mutations in communities while still allowing frequencies of extant organisms to change. We turn to digital organisms to investigate the effects of rapid evolution on host-parasite community diversity in the presence and absence of novel variation. We remove the source of variation in coevolved digital host-parasite communities and allow them to reach an equilibrium. We find that coevolved host-parasite communities are surprisingly stable in the absence of new variation. However, the communities at equilibrium are less diverse than those that continued to experience mutations. In either case, hosts coevolving with parasites are significantly more diverse than hosts evolving alone. Harnessing an advantage of in silico evolution, we show that novel variation increases host diversity in communities with parasites further than the trivial increase expected from new mutations.
- S. Altizer, D. Harvell, and E. Friedle. Rapid evolutionary dynamics and disease threats to biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18(11):589--596, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S.-H. P. Bérénos C, Wegner KM. Antagonistic coevolution with parasites maintains host genetic diversity: an experimental test. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1703):218--224, January 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Best, A. White, E. Kisdi, J. Antonovics, M. Brockhurst, and M. Boots. The Evolution of Host-Parasite Range. The American naturalist, 176(1):63--71, 2010.Google Scholar
- M. Brockhurst, P. Rainey, and A. Buckling. The effect of spatial heterogeneity and parasites on the evolution of host diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271(1534):107, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Carroll, A. Hendry, D. Reznick, and C. Fox. Evolution on ecological time-scales. Functional Ecology, 21(3):387--393, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Cooper and C. Ofria. Evolution of stable ecosystems in populations of digital organisms. Artificial life eight, page 227, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Dobzhansky. Biology, molecular and organismic. American Zoologist, 4(4):443--452, 1964.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Doebeli and U. Dieckmann. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. American Naturalist, 156(4):77--101, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Duffy and L. Sivars-Becker. Rapid evolution and ecological host--parasite dynamics. Ecology Letters, 10(1):44--53, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Fussmann, M. Loreau, and P. Abrams. Eco-evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Functional Ecology, 21(3):465--477, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Gould. Wonderful life: The Burgess Shale and the nature of history. WW Norton & Company, 1990.Google Scholar
- N. Hairston Jr, S. Ellner, M. Geber, T. Yoshida, and J. Fox. Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecology Letters, 8(10):1114--1127, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Hudson, A. Dobson, and K. Lafferty. Is a healthy ecosystem one that is rich in parasites? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(7):381--385, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Kerr, J. D. West, and B. J. M. Bohannan. Bacteriophages: Models for exploring basic principles of ecology, chapter 2, pages 31--63. University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2008.Google Scholar
- A. Kraaijeveld. Cost of resistance to parasites in digital organisms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20(3):845--853, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Kutter and A. Sulakvelidze. Bacteriophages: biology and applications. CRC, 2005.Google Scholar
- J. Meyer, S. Ellner, N. Hairston, L. Jones, and T. Yoshida. Prey evolution on the time scale of predator--prey dynamics revealed by allele-specific quantitative PCR. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(28):10690, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Ofria, D. M. Bryson, and C. O. Wilke. Artificial Life Models in Software, chapter 1, pages 3--32. Springer, 2nd edition, July 2009.Google Scholar
- C. Ofria and C. Wilke. Avida: A software platform for research in computational evolutionary biology. Artificial Life, 10(2):191--229, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Poulin and S. Morand. The diversity of parasites. Quarterly Review of Biology, 75(3):277--293, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Price. Evolutionary biology of parasites. Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
- T. Ray. An approach to the synthesis of life. Artificial life II, 11:371--408, 1991.Google Scholar
- T. Schoener. The Newest Synthesis: Understanding the Interplay of Evolutionary and Ecological Dynamics. Science, 331(6016):426, 2011.Google Scholar
- J. Shao and T. S. Ray. Maintenance of species diversity by predation in the tierra system. In 12th International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems (ALIFE), pages 533--540, 2010.Google Scholar
- L. Slobodkin. Growth and regulation of animal populations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston New York, 1961.Google Scholar
- J. Thompson. Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13(8):329--332, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Torchin, K. Lafferty, A. Dobson, V. McKenzie, and A. Kuris. Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature, 421(6923):628--630, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Yoshida, L. Jones, S. Ellner, G. Fussmann, and N. Hairston. Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator--prey system. Nature, 424(6946):303--306, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Rapid host-parasite coevolution drives the production and maintenance of diversity in digital organisms
Recommendations
Minimal criterion coevolution: a new approach to open-ended search
GECCO '17: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation ConferenceRecent studies have emphasized the merits of search processes that lack overarching objectives, instead promoting divergence by rewarding behavioral novelty. While this less objective search paradigm is more open-ended and divergent, it still differs ...
Supportive coevolution
GECCO '12: Proceedings of the 14th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computationAutomatically configuring and dynamically controlling an Evolutionary Algorithm's (EA's) parameters is a complex task, yet doing so allows EAs to become more powerful and require less problem specific tuning to become effective. Supportive Coevolution ...
Evolving multicellularity in digital organisms through reproductive altruism
GECCO '13 Companion: Proceedings of the 15th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computationThe processes by which multicellular organisms first emerged from their unicellular ancestors are fundamental to the biology of complex, differentiated life forms. Previous work suggests that reproductive division of labor between specialized germ and ...
Comments