skip to main content
10.1145/2001576.2001607acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Rapid host-parasite coevolution drives the production and maintenance of diversity in digital organisms

Published:12 July 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Accumulating evidence suggests evolution and ecology can happen on similar time scales. Coevolution between hosts and parasites is a practical example of interacting ecological and evolutionary dynamics. Antagonistic interactions theoretically and experimentally increase host diversity, but the contribution of novel variation to diversity is not well understood. In laboratory or natural settings it is infeasible to prohibit novel mutations in communities while still allowing frequencies of extant organisms to change. We turn to digital organisms to investigate the effects of rapid evolution on host-parasite community diversity in the presence and absence of novel variation. We remove the source of variation in coevolved digital host-parasite communities and allow them to reach an equilibrium. We find that coevolved host-parasite communities are surprisingly stable in the absence of new variation. However, the communities at equilibrium are less diverse than those that continued to experience mutations. In either case, hosts coevolving with parasites are significantly more diverse than hosts evolving alone. Harnessing an advantage of in silico evolution, we show that novel variation increases host diversity in communities with parasites further than the trivial increase expected from new mutations.

References

  1. S. Altizer, D. Harvell, and E. Friedle. Rapid evolutionary dynamics and disease threats to biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18(11):589--596, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S.-H. P. Bérénos C, Wegner KM. Antagonistic coevolution with parasites maintains host genetic diversity: an experimental test. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1703):218--224, January 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. Best, A. White, E. Kisdi, J. Antonovics, M. Brockhurst, and M. Boots. The Evolution of Host-Parasite Range. The American naturalist, 176(1):63--71, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Brockhurst, P. Rainey, and A. Buckling. The effect of spatial heterogeneity and parasites on the evolution of host diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271(1534):107, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. Carroll, A. Hendry, D. Reznick, and C. Fox. Evolution on ecological time-scales. Functional Ecology, 21(3):387--393, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. T. Cooper and C. Ofria. Evolution of stable ecosystems in populations of digital organisms. Artificial life eight, page 227, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. T. Dobzhansky. Biology, molecular and organismic. American Zoologist, 4(4):443--452, 1964.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. Doebeli and U. Dieckmann. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. American Naturalist, 156(4):77--101, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Duffy and L. Sivars-Becker. Rapid evolution and ecological host--parasite dynamics. Ecology Letters, 10(1):44--53, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. G. Fussmann, M. Loreau, and P. Abrams. Eco-evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Functional Ecology, 21(3):465--477, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S. Gould. Wonderful life: The Burgess Shale and the nature of history. WW Norton & Company, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. N. Hairston Jr, S. Ellner, M. Geber, T. Yoshida, and J. Fox. Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecology Letters, 8(10):1114--1127, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. P. Hudson, A. Dobson, and K. Lafferty. Is a healthy ecosystem one that is rich in parasites? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(7):381--385, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. B. Kerr, J. D. West, and B. J. M. Bohannan. Bacteriophages: Models for exploring basic principles of ecology, chapter 2, pages 31--63. University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Kraaijeveld. Cost of resistance to parasites in digital organisms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20(3):845--853, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. E. Kutter and A. Sulakvelidze. Bacteriophages: biology and applications. CRC, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Meyer, S. Ellner, N. Hairston, L. Jones, and T. Yoshida. Prey evolution on the time scale of predator--prey dynamics revealed by allele-specific quantitative PCR. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(28):10690, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. C. Ofria, D. M. Bryson, and C. O. Wilke. Artificial Life Models in Software, chapter 1, pages 3--32. Springer, 2nd edition, July 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. C. Ofria and C. Wilke. Avida: A software platform for research in computational evolutionary biology. Artificial Life, 10(2):191--229, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. Poulin and S. Morand. The diversity of parasites. Quarterly Review of Biology, 75(3):277--293, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. P. Price. Evolutionary biology of parasites. Princeton University Press, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. T. Ray. An approach to the synthesis of life. Artificial life II, 11:371--408, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. T. Schoener. The Newest Synthesis: Understanding the Interplay of Evolutionary and Ecological Dynamics. Science, 331(6016):426, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. Shao and T. S. Ray. Maintenance of species diversity by predation in the tierra system. In 12th International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems (ALIFE), pages 533--540, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. L. Slobodkin. Growth and regulation of animal populations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston New York, 1961.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. J. Thompson. Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13(8):329--332, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. M. Torchin, K. Lafferty, A. Dobson, V. McKenzie, and A. Kuris. Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature, 421(6923):628--630, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. T. Yoshida, L. Jones, S. Ellner, G. Fussmann, and N. Hairston. Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator--prey system. Nature, 424(6946):303--306, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Rapid host-parasite coevolution drives the production and maintenance of diversity in digital organisms

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GECCO '11: Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
          July 2011
          2140 pages
          ISBN:9781450305570
          DOI:10.1145/2001576

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 July 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

          Upcoming Conference

          GECCO '24
          Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 14 - 18, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader