skip to main content
10.1145/2001576.2001736acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How hard should we run?

Published:12 July 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

All evolutionary algorithms trade off exploration and exploitation in optimisation problems; dynamic problems are no exception. We investigate this trade-off, over a range of algorithm settings, on dynamic variants of three well-known optimisation problems (One Max, Royal Road and knapsack), using Yang's XOR method to vary the scale and rate of change. Extremely exploitative algorithm settings performed best for a surprisingly wide range of problems; even where they were not the most effective, they still performed competitively, and even in those cases, the best performers were still far more exploitative than most would anticipate.

References

  1. G. Dantzig. Discrete-variable extremum problems. Operations Research, pages 266--277, 1957.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Grefenstette. Genetic algorithms for changing environments. Parallel problem solving from nature, 2:137--144, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Y. Jin and J. Branke. Evolutionary optimization in uncertain environments -- a survey. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 9(3):303--317, June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. L. Kang, A. Zhou, B. McKay, Y. Li, and Z. Kang. Benchmarking algorithms for dynamic travelling salesman problems. In Evolutionary Computation, 2004. CEC2004. Congress on, volume 2, pages 1286--1292 Vol.2, June 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Li, S. Yang, T. T. Nguyen, E. L. Yu, X. Yao, Y. Jin, H. g. Beyer, and P. N. Suganthan. Benchmark generator for cec'2009 competition on dynamic optimization. Technical report, Dept of Computer Science, University of Leicester, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. MacNish. Towards unbiased benchmarking of evolutionary and hybrid algorithms for real-valued optimisation. Connection Science, 19(4):361--385, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Mitchell, S. Forrest, and J. Holland. The royal road for genetic algorithms: Fitness landscapes and GA performance. In Towards a Practice of Autonomous Systems: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Artificial Life, pages 245--254, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. P. Rohlfshagen and X. Yao. Dynamic combinatorial optimisation problems: an analysis of the subset sum problem. Soft Computing-A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications, pages 1--12, to appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Schaffer and L. Eshelman. On Crossover as an Evolutionary Viable Strategy. In R. Belew and L. Booker, editors, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pages 61--68. Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. K. Tang, X. Yao, P. Suganthan, C. MacNish, Y. Chen, C. Chen, and Z. Yang. Benchmark functions for the cec'2008 special session and competition on large scale global optimization. Technical report, Nature Inspired Computation and Applications Laboratory, USTC China, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Wolpert, W. Macready, I. Center, and C. San Jose. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 1(1):67--82, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Yang. Non-stationary problem optimization using the primal-dual genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, volume 3, pages 2246--2253. IEEE Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Yang. Genetic algorithms with elitism-based immigrants for changing optimization problems. In Proceedings of the European Evolutionary Computing Workshops (Evoworkshops), volume 4448 of Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 627--636, Berlin, 2007. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Yang and R. Tinos. Hyper-selection in dynamic environments. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 3185--3192. IEEE Press, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Yang and X. Yao. Population-based incremental learning with associative memory for dynamic environments. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 12(5):542--561, Oct 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. How hard should we run?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GECCO '11: Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
        July 2011
        2140 pages
        ISBN:9781450305570
        DOI:10.1145/2001576

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 July 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

        Upcoming Conference

        GECCO '24
        Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
        July 14 - 18, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader