skip to main content
research-article

Berkeley Foundation for Opportunities in Information Technology: A Decade of Broadening Participation

Published:01 October 2011Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The Berkeley Foundation for Opportunities in Information Technology is a decade-old endeavor to expose pre-college young women and underrepresented racial and ethnic minorities to the fields of computer science and engineering, and prepare them for rigorous, university-level study. We have served more than 150 students, and graduated more than 65 seniors who have gone on to attend some of the top institutions in the country. Some of the lessons we have learned include the importance of sustained funding to support a continuing year-round program, world-class leaders and resources, and family and alumni involvement. In this article, we share the inner workings of our program, from its foundation during the dot-com heyday through today, in hopes that our best practices can be useful to others working toward the goal of broadening participation.

References

  1. ACM. 2003. A Model Curriculum for K-12 Computer Science: Final Report of the K-12 Task Force Curriculum Committee. Computer Science Teachers Association, ACM, October 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Aspirations in Computing Award. 2010. Available online at http://www.ncwit.org/work.awards.aspiration.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BFOIT. 2010. Berkeley Foundation for Opportunities in Information Technology. Available online at http://bfoit.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Blum, L., Cortina, T. J., Lazowska, E., and Wise, J. 2008. The expansion of CS4HS: An outreach program for high school teachers. In Proceedings of the 39th Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’08). 377--378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bruckman, A., Biggers, M., Ericson, B., McKlin, T., Dimond, J., DiSalvo, B., Hewner, M., Ni, L., and Yardi, S. 2009. Georgia computes!: Improving the computing education pipeline. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’09). 86--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Camp, T. 1997. The incredible shrinking pipeline. Comm. ACM 40, 10, 103--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., and Barnett, S. M. 2009. Women’s underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psych. Bul. 135, 218--261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. CS4HS. 2010. CS4HS Summer Workshops. Available online at http://www.cs4hs.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. CSTB, National Research Council. 1999. Being Fluent in Information Technology. National Acad. Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dabbagh, N. and Kitsantas, A. 2005. Using Web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instruc. Sci. 33, 513--540.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Dewey, J. 1938. Experience and education. Collier Books, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Downs, R. 2006. Learning to Think Spatially: GIS as a Support System in the K-12 Curriculum. NRC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. EECS. 2010. Outreach Programs. Available online at http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/department/OutreachPrograms.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Eliot, J. and Macfarlane-Smith, I. 1983. An international directory of spatial tests. Windsor, Berks: Nfer-Nelson.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Expanding Your Horizons Conferences. 2010. Available online at http://www.expandingyourhorizons.org/. Math Science Network, Mills College, Oakland, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Facebook. 2010. Welcome to Facebook. Available online at http://www.facebook.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Goode, J. 2008. Reprogramming college preparatory computer science. Commun. ACM 51, 11 (Nov. 2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gordon, J. 1996. Tracks for learning: Meta-cognition and learning technologies. Austral. J. Educ. Technol. 12, 1, 46--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Guay, R. and McDaniels, E. 1976. Visualization of viewpoints. Purdue Research Found, West Lafayette, IN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Haas, G. 2010. Introduction to Computer Programming. Available online at http://www.bfoit.org/itp/itp.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hadwin, A.F. and Winne, P. H. 2001. A software tool for promoting self-regulation. Educ. Res. Eval. 7, 2--3, 313--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Halpern, D. F. 2000. Sex differences and cognitive abilities. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Harrison, C. 2009. Online learning and thinking in science: Uncovering how secondary school students learn about velocity in a Web-based environment. Ed.D. dissertation, Mills College.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Harvey, B. 1997. Computer Science Logo Style (vols 1--3). 2nd. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Holden, C. 2009. Science needs kids with vision. Science 325, 1190--1191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Humphreys, S. and Spertus, E. 2002. Leveraging an alternative source of computer scientists: Reentry programs. SIGCSE Bull. 34, 2, 53--56. Available online at http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/543812.543830. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jones, S. and Burnett, G. 2008. Spatial ability and learning to program. Hum. Technol. 4, 47--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Kekelis, L., Ancheta, R., and Heber, E. 2005. Hurdles in the Pipeline: Girls and Technology Careers. Frontiers: J. Wom. Stud. 26, 1, 99--109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Kelleher, C. and Pausch, R. 2007. Using storytelling to motivate programming. Commun. ACM 50, 7, 58--64. Available online at http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1272516.1272540. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Khooshabeh, P. (in preparation). Turtle power: The effect of a CS enrichment program on spatial thinking.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Kroll, L. Cossey, R., Donahue, D., Galguera, T., Laboskey, V., Richert, A., and Tucher, P. 2004. Teaching as principled practice: Managing complexity for social change. Sage Publications, Inc., London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. LEAD Engineering. 2010. Available online at http://www.leadengineeringsite.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Lewis, D. 2006. What is Web 2.0? Crossroads 13, 1, 3--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Linn, M. and A. Petersen. 1985. Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Dev. 56, 1479--1498.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Margolis, J. and Fisher, A. 2002. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women and Computing. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Margolis, J. 2008. Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race and Computing. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Marra, R.M., Peterson, K., and Britsch, B. 2008. Collaboration as a means to building capacity: Results and future directions of the National Girls Collaborative Project. J. Wom. Minor. Sci. Eng. 14, 119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. McLoughlin, C. and Hollingworth, R. 2001. Developing science students’ metacognitive problem solving skills online. Austral. J. Educ. Technol. 17, 1, 50--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. National Coalition for Women in Technology. 2010. Available online at http://www.ncwit.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. National Girls Collaborative Project. 2010. Available online at http://www.ngcproject.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. NSF. 2009. Broader Impacts. Available online at http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/gpa/broaderimpacts.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Papert, S. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Pearl, A., Pollack, M. E., Riskin, E., Wolf, E., Thomas, B., and Wu, A. 1990. Becoming a computer scientist. Commun. ACM 33, 11, 47--57. Available online at http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/92755.92757. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Polya, G. 1973. How To Solve It. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., and Kafai, Y. 2009. Scratch: programming for all. Commun. ACM 52, 11, 60--67. Available online at http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. SAPEP. 2010. Business Operations -- Budget & Capital Resources -- Operating Budget -- Legislative Reports -- 2009-10 Legislative Reports. Available online at http://www.ucop.edu/budget/legreports/0910/legreq.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Schraw, G. 1998. Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instruc. Sci. 26, 1, 113--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Sheard, J. 2004. Electronic learning communities: Strategies for establishment and management. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’04). 37--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Shepard, R. N. and Metzler, J. 1971. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Sci 171, 701--703.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Sotomayor, S. 2001. A Latina Judge’s Voice (transcript of 2001 Judge Mario G. Olmos Memorial Lecture). Berkeley La Raza Law Journal, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Tate, E. 2005. Hanging with Friends, Velocity Style! Learning from multiple representations of velocity. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Techbridge. 2010. Techbridge Girls > Home. Available online at http://www.techbridgegirls.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Vandenberg and Kusem, S. G. 1978. Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Percept. Motor Skills 47, 599--604.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, E. Souberman Eds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Wai, J., Lubinski, D., and Benbow, C. P. 2009. Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. J. Educ. Psych. 101, 817--835.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. WGBH and ACM. 2009. New Image for Computing : Report on Market Research (April 2009). WGBH Educational Foundation and the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. WICSE. 2010. WICSE at UC Berkeley. Available online at http://inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~wicse/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Berkeley Foundation for Opportunities in Information Technology: A Decade of Broadening Participation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
      ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 11, Issue 3
      October 2011
      148 pages
      EISSN:1946-6226
      DOI:10.1145/2037276
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 October 2011
      • Accepted: 1 February 2011
      • Revised: 1 January 2011
      • Received: 1 February 2010
      Published in toce Volume 11, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader