skip to main content
10.1145/2037373.2037377acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Intimate mobiles: grasping, kissing and whispering as a means of telecommunication in mobile phones

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we explore how direct physical cues of interpersonal nearness can be achieved in mobile phones. Exemplarily, we present three novel means of communication for mobile phones: grasping, kissing and whispering. Reviewing the related work, we point to a research gap in direct physical near-body actuation in mobile telecommunication. To assess this gap, we present three prototypes that implement the proposed novel means of communication. We present initial user comments on the prototypes, which point to acceptance issues. We conclude in a set of research questions for future explorations in this field.

References

  1. IDEO Social Mobiles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyle, M. and Dean, J. Eye -Contact, Distance and Affiliation. Sociometry, 28 (3). 289--304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Brave, S. and Dahley, A., inTouch: a medi um for haptic interpersonal communication. in CHI '97: CHI '97 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, (Atlanta, Georgia, 1997), ACM, 363--364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chang, A., O'Modhrain, S., Jacob, R., Gunther, E. and Ishii, H., ComTouch: design of a vibro tactile communication device. in DIS '02: Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems, (2002), ACM Press, 312--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chung, H., Chia Hsun Jackie, L. and Selker, T., Lover's cups: drinking interfaces as new communication channels. in CHI '06: CHI '06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, (Montréal, Québec, Canada, 2006), ACM, 375--380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dourish, P. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. {The MIT Press}, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Eichhorn, E., Wettach, R. and Hornecker, E., A stroking device for spatially separated couples. in MobileHCI '08: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008), ACM, 303--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Giasson, M. and Bouchard, L. Effect of Therapeutic Touch on the Well -Being of Persons with Terminal Cancer. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 16 (3). 383--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., Eckoldt, K., Heidecker, S., Hillmann, U. and Laschke, M., Technologie, die verbindet? Die bedürfniszentrierte Gestaltung von Kommunikationstechnologien für liebende (und andere, die sich mögen). in Usability Professionals 10, (Stuttgart).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hemmert, F., Gollner, U., Löwe, M., Wohlauf, A. and Joost, G., Intimate Mobiles: Near -Body Telepresence through Tightness, Wetness and Airflow in Mobile Phones. in Erotic HCI '10: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Erotic Life in HCI, (Reykjavik, Iceland, 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hemmert, F., Gollner, U., Löwe, M., Wohlauf, A. and Joost, G., Intimate Mobiles: Organic Actuation through Pressure, Moisture, and Atmosphere in Mobile Phones. in OUI '11: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop Organic User Interfaces, (Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Patterson, M. An arousal model of interpersonal intimacy. Psychological Review, 83 (3). 235--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Paulos, E. and Canny, J. Personal tele -embodiment. 155--167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Peck, J. and Childers, T. Individual Differences in Haptic Information Processing: The "Need for Touch" Scale. The Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (3). 430--442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Strong, R. and Gaver, B., Feather, Scent, and Shaker: Supporting Simple Intimacy. in Proceedings of CSCW '96, (Boston, MA, USA, 1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Tollmar, K. and Persson, J., Understanding remote presence. in NordiCHI '02: Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human -computer interaction, (Aarhus, Denmark, 2002), ACM, 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Vetere, F., Gibbs, M., Kjeldskov, J., Howard, S., Mueller, F., Pedell, S., Mecoles, K. and Bunyan, M., Mediating intimacy: designing technol ogies to support strong-tie relationships. in CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, (Portland, Oregon, USA, 2005), ACM, 471--480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Wang, R. and Quek, F., Touch & talk: contextualizing remote touch for affect ive interaction. in TEI '10: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction, (Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA), ACM, 13--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Werner, J., Wettach, R. and Hornecker, E. United-pulse: feeling your partner's pulse Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, ACM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Intimate mobiles: grasping, kissing and whispering as a means of telecommunication in mobile phones

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MobileHCI '11: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
      August 2011
      781 pages
      ISBN:9781450305419
      DOI:10.1145/2037373

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 August 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader