skip to main content
10.1145/2037556.2037574acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social media use by government: from the routine to the critical

Published:12 June 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social media (i.e., Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, YouTube) and other services with user-generated content have made a staggering amount of information (and misinformation) available. Government officials seek to leverage these resources to improve services and communication with citizens. Yet, the sheer volume of social data streams generates substantial noise that must be filtered. Nonetheless, potential exists to identify issues in real time, such that emergency management can monitor and respond to issues concerning public safety. By detecting meaningful patterns and trends in the stream of messages and information flow, events can be identified as spikes in activity, while meaning can be deciphered through changes in content. This paper presents findings from a pilot study we conducted between June and December 2010 with government officials in Arlington, Virginia (and the greater National Capitol Region around Washington, DC) with a view to understanding the use of social media by government officials as well as community organizations, businesses and the public. We are especially interested in understanding social media use in crisis situations (whether severe or fairly common, such as traffic or weather crises).

References

  1. Twitter blog: Measuring tweets. {cited 2010 November 4}; Available from: http://blog.twitter.com/2010/02/measuring-tweets.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Flickr. {cited; Available from: http://www.flickr.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Smarter transportation: 10 social media tools to navigate your city. {cited; Available from: http://mashable.com/2009/09/29/social-media-transportation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. YouTube. {cited; Available from: http://www.youtube.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gasbuddy: Find local gas prices. {cited; Available from: http://gasbuddy.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. CTRnet: Community, Tragedy, and Recovery network. {cited; Available from: http://www.ctrnet.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. See-Click-Fix in Arlington County. {cited June 2, 2010}; Available from: http://www.seeclickfix.com/arlington_2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Arlington County Blog Central. {cited June 4, 2010}; Available from: http://www.arlingtonva.us/departments/Communications/page70455.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Arlington County Facebook Profile. {cited May 14, 2010}; Available from: http://www.facebook.com/ArlingtonVA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Arlington County Flickr account. {cited 2010 Dec. 14}; Available from: http://www.flickr.com/photos/arlingtonvaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Arlington County News on Tweeter. {cited 2010 Dec. 14}; Available from: http://twitter.com/arlingtoncounty.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Arlington County, VA Official Site. {cited 2010 Dec. 14}; Available from: http://www.arlingtonva.us/default.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. O'Reilly, T., What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies, 2007. 65(1st Quarter): p. 17--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. boyd, d. and N. Ellison, Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship.. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007. 13(1): p. article 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lampe, C., N. Ellison, and C. Steinfield. A face(book) in the crowd: social searching vs. social browsing. in Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 2006. Banff, Alberta Canada: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Tepper, M., The rise of social software. netWorker, 2003. 7(3): p. 18--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Furnas, G. W., et al. Why do tagging system work?. in Computer-Human Interaction. 2006: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Smith, A., Government Online. 2010, Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Arlington County Blog Central. {cited 2010 Dec. 14}; Available from: http://www.arlingtonva.us/departments/Communications/page70455.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Hughes, A. L. and L. Palen. Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events. in Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management. 2009. Gothenburg, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hughes, A. L., et al. "Site-seeing" in disaster: An examination of online social convergence. in International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM). 2008. Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Zuckerman, E. Studying Twitter and the Moldovan protests. My heart's in Accra {blog} 2009 April 13, 2009 {cited 2009 January 6}; Available from: http://www.ethanzuckeman.com/blog/2009/04/13/study ing-twitter-and-the-moldovan-protests/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Opsahl, A. County Experiments With Monitoring Social Media in Emergencies. Emergency Management 2010 {cited October 22, 2010}; Available from: http://www.emergencymgmt.com/disaster/NC-County-Monitoring-Social-Media-Emergency.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sakaki, T., M. Okazaki, and Y. Matsuo, Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors, in WWW '10: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World Wide Web. 2010, ACM: Raleigh, NC, USA. p. 851--860. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Social Media Sells. Ogilvy & Mather 2010 {cited November 1, 2010}; Available from: http://www.ogilvy.com/News/Press-Releases/November-2010-Social-Media-Sells.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, A., et al., The Internet and Civic Engagement. 2009, Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Social media use by government: from the routine to the critical

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      dg.o '11: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times
      June 2011
      398 pages
      ISBN:9781450307628
      DOI:10.1145/2037556

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 June 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader