Katherine Panciera
Loren Terveen
ABSTRACT
Many people rely on open collaboration projects to run their computer (Linux), browse the web (Mozilla Firefox), and get information (Wikipedia). While these projects are successful, many such efforts suffer from lack of participation. Understanding what motivates users to participate and the benefits they perceive from their participation can help address this problem. We examined these issues through a survey of contributors and information consumers in the Cyclopath geographic wiki. We analyzed subject responses to identify a number of key motives and perceived benefits. Based on these results, we articulate several general techniques to encourage more and new forms of participation in open collaboration communities. Some of these techniques have the potential to engage information consumers more deeply and productively in the life of open collaboration communities.
- J. Antin, R. Yee, C. Cheshire, and O. Nov. Gender differences in wikipedia editing. In Proc. Wikisym, 2011. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. Bryant, A. Forte, and A. Bruckman. Becoming Wikipedian: Transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. In Proc. GROUP, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Cheshire. Selective incentives and generalized information exchange. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(1), 2003.Google Scholar
- R. Cialdini and V. Griskevicius. Social influence. Advanced Social Psychology: The State of the Science, 2010.Google Scholar
- D. Cosley, D. Frankowski, L. Terveen, and J. Riedl. Using intelligent task routing and contribution review to help communities build artifacts of lasting value. In Proc. CHI, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Cosley, D. Frankowski, L. Terveen, and J. Riedl. Suggestbot: using intelligent task routing to help people find work in wikipedia. In Proc. IUI, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Ducheneant, N. Yee, E. Nickell, and R. Moore. Alone together?: exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games. In Proc. CHI, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Ekeh. Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions. Heinemann Educational, 1974.Google Scholar
- F. Harper, D. Frankowski, S. Drenner, Y. Ren, S. Kiesler, L. Terveen, R. Kraut, and J. Riedl. Talk amongst yourselves: inviting users to participate in online conversations. In Proc. IUI, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Harper, S. Xin Li, Y. Chen, and J. Konstan. Social comparisons to motivate contributions to an online community. Persuasive Technology, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Hars and S. Ou. Working for free? motivations of participating in open source projects. In Proc. HICSS, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Karau and K. Williams. Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), October 1993.Google Scholar
- K. R. Lakhani and R. G. Wolf. Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects. SSRN eLibrary, 2003.Google Scholar
- S. T. K. Lam, A. Uduwage, Z. Dong, D. Musicant, S. Sen, L. Terveen, and J. Riedl. Wp:clubhouse? an exploration of wikipedia's gender imbalance. In Proc. Wikisym, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Lampe, R. Wash, A. Velasquez, and E. Ozkaya. Motivations to participate in online communities. In Proc. CHI, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Ling et al. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Luther, K. Caine, K. Ziegler, and A. Bruckman. Why it works (When it works): Success factors in online creative collaboration, 2010.Google Scholar
- M. Masli, R. Priedhorsky, and L. Terveen. Task specialization in social production communities: The case of geographic volunteer work. In Proc. ICWSM, 2011.Google Scholar
- M. Muller, N. S. Shami, D. R. Millen, and J. Feinberg. We are all lurkers: consuming behaviors among authors and readers in an enterprise file-sharing service. In Proc. GROUP, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Nonnecke and J. Preece. Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. In Proc. CHI, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O. Nov. What motivates wikipedians? CACM, 50, November 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. M. Omoto and M. Snyder. Sustained helping without obligation: Motivation, longevity of service, and perceived attitude change among AIDS volunteers. 68, 1995.Google Scholar
- S. Oreg and O. Nov. Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Panciera, A. Halfaker, and L. Terveen. Wikipedians are born, not made: A study of power editors on Wikipedia. In Proc. GROUP, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Panciera, R. Priedhorsky, T. Erickson, and L. Terveen. Lurking? cyclopaths? a quantitative lifecycle analysis of user behavior in a geowiki. In Proc. CHI, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Preece and B. Shneiderman. The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 2009.Google Scholar
- R. Priedhorsky, M. Masli, and L. Terveen. Eliciting and focusing geographic volunteer work. In Proc. CSCW, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Priedhorsky and L. Terveen. The computational geowiki: What, why, and how. In Proc. CSCW, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Rashid, K. Ling, R. Tassone, P. Resnick, R. Kraut, and J. Riedl. Motivating participation by displaying the value of contribution. In Proc. CHI, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Suhonen, A. Lampinen, C. Cheshire, and J. Antin. Everyday favors: A case study of a local online gift exchange system. In Proc. GROUP, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Takahashi, M. Fujimoto, and N. Yamasaki. The active lurker: influence of an in-house online community on its outside environment. In Proc. GROUP, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Torre, S. A. Sheppard, R. Priedhorsky, and L. Terveen. bumpy, caution with merging: an exploration of tagging in a geowiki. In Proc. GROUP, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Wiggins and K. Crowston. Reclassifying success and tragedy in FLOSS projects. In Proc. OSS, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- "How should I go from ___ to ___ without getting killed?": motivation and benefits in open collaboration
Recommendations
Eliciting and focusing geographic volunteer work
CSCW '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative workOpen content communities such as wikis derive their value from the work done by users. However, a key challenge is to elicit work that is sufficient and focused where needed. We address this challenge in a geographic open content community, the ...
Lurking? cyclopaths?: a quantitative lifecycle analysis of user behavior in a geowiki
CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsOnline communities produce rich behavioral datasets, e.g., Usenet news conversations, Wikipedia edits, and Facebook friend networks. Analysis of such datasets yields important insights (like the "long tail" of user participation) and suggests novel ...
Understanding member motivation for contributing to different types of virtual communities: a proposed framework
SIGMIS CPR '07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on Computer personnel research: The global information technology workforcePrevious research indicates that the type and purpose of a virtual community (wiki, blog, and Internet Forum) may play a role in determining a member's motivation for contribution to a virtual community, but does not fully explore this idea. This study ...
Comments