skip to main content
10.1145/2049536.2049572acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improving calibration time and accuracy for situation-specific models of color differentiation

Published:24 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Color vision deficiencies (CVDs) cause problems in situations where people need to differentiate the colors used in digital displays. Recoloring tools exist to reduce the problem, but these tools need a model of the user's color-differentiation ability in order to work. Situation-specific models are a recent approach that accounts for all of the factors affecting a person's CVD (including genetic, acquired, and environmental causes) by using calibration data to form the model. This approach works well, but requires repeated calibration - and the best available calibration procedure takes more than 30 minutes. To address this limitation, we have developed a new situation-specific model of human color differentiation (called ICD-2) that needs far fewer calibration trials. The new model uses a color space that better matches human color vision compared to the RGB space of the old model, and can therefore extract more meaning from each calibration test. In an empirical comparison, we found that ICD-2 is 24 times faster than the old approach, and had small but significant gains in accuracy. The efficiency of ICD-2 makes it feasible for situation-specific models of individual color differentiation to be used in the real world.

References

  1. Birch, J., Barbur, J., Harlow, A. New Method Based on Random Luminance Masking for Measuring Isochromatic Zones Using High Resolution Colour Displays. Opthal. Physiol. Opt. 12(2), 1992, 133--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Birch, J. Diagnosis of Defective Colour Vision. 2nd ed., 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Birch, J. Extreme Anomalous Trichromatism. In Mollon, Pokorny, and Knoblauch, eds., Normal and Defective Colour Vision. Oxford University Press, 2003, 364--369.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Brettel, H., Viénot, F., Mollon, J. Computerized Simulation of Color Appearance for Dichromats. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A., 14(10), 1997, 2647--2655.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cole, B. The Handicap of Abnormal Colour Vision. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 87(4--5), 2004, 258--275.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE). Colorimetry, 2nd ed., CIE Publication 15.2, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fitzgibbon, A., Pilu, M., Fisher, R. Direct Least Squares Fitting of Ellipses. Trans. PAMI, 21(5), 1999, 476--480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Flatla, D. R., Gutwin, C. Individual Models of Color Differentiation to Improve Interpretability of Information Visualization. Proc. CHI 2010, 2563--2572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Halir, R., Flusser, J. Numerically Stable Direct Least Squares Fitting of Ellipses. Proc. WSCG 1998, 59--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jefferson, L., Harvey, R. Accommodating Color Blind Computer Users. Proc. ASSETS 2006, 40--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jefferson, L., Harvey, R. An Interface to Support Color Blind Computer Users. Proc. CHI 2007, 1535--1538. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kuhn, G., Oliveira, M., Fernandes, L. An Efficient Naturalness-Preserving Image-Recoloring Method for Dichromats. IEEE Trans. Vis. and Comp. Graphics 14(6), 2008, 1747--1754. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lindbloom, B. Website: www.brucelindbloom.com. Last accessed May 6th, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lomax, R., Ridgway P., Meldrum M. Does Occupational Exposure to Organic Solvents Affect Colour Discrimination? Toxicological Reviews, 23(2), 2004, 91--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Machado, G., Oliveira, M., Fernandes, L. A Physiologically-based Model for Simulation of Color Vision Deficiency. IEEE Trans. Vis. & Comp. Graph. 15(6), 2009, 1291--1298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Meyer, G., Greenburg, D. Color-Defective Vision and Computer Graphics Displays. IEEE Comp. Graph. & Appl., 8(5), 1988, 28--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Neitz J., Jacobs, G. Polymorphism of the Long-Wavelength Cone in Normal Human Colour Vision. Nature, 323, 1986, 623--625.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Zoirson, A., Wandell, B. The Ellipsoidal Representation of Spectral Sensitivity. Vision Research, 30(4), 1990, 647--652.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Rasche, K., Geist R., Westall, J. Detail Preserving Repro-duction of Color Images for Monochromats and Dichromats. IEEE Comp. Graph. & Appl., 25(3), 2005, 22--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rasche, K., Geist R., Westall, J. Re-coloring Images for Gamuts of Lower Dimension. Computer Graphics Forum, 24(3), 2005, 423--432.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Regan, B., Reffin, J., Mollon, J. Luminance Noise and the Rapid Determination of Discrimination Ellipses in Colour Deficiency. Vision Research, 34(10), 1994, 1279--1299.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sears, A., Lin, M., Jacko, J., Xiao, Y. When Computers Fade: Pervasive Computing and Situationally-Induced Im-pairments and Disabilities. Proc. HCI Int. 2003, 1298--1302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Stone, M. A Field Guide to Digital Color. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tufte, E. Envisioning Information. 10th ed., 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Viénot, F., Brettel, H., Ott, L., Ben M'Barek, A., Mollon, J. What Do Colour-Blind People See? Nat. 376, 1995, 127--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Wakita, K., Shimamura, K. SmartColor: Disambiguation Framework for the Colorblind. Proc. ASSETS 2005, 158--165. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ware, C. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Wyszecki, G., Stiles, W. Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae. 2nd ed., 2000..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Improving calibration time and accuracy for situation-specific models of color differentiation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ASSETS '11: The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
        October 2011
        348 pages
        ISBN:9781450309202
        DOI:10.1145/2049536

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 October 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader