skip to main content
10.1145/2063576.2063878acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Semantic convolution kernels over dependency trees: smoothed partial tree kernel

Published:24 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, natural language processing techniques have been used more and more in IR. Among other syntactic and semantic parsing are effective methods for the design of complex applications like for example question answering and sentiment analysis. Unfortunately, extracting feature representations suitable for machine learning algorithms from linguistic structures is typically difficult. In this paper, we describe one of the most advanced piece of technology for automatic engineering of syntactic and semantic patterns. This method merges together convolution dependency tree kernels with lexical similarities. It can efficiently and effectively measure the similarity between dependency structures, whose lexical nodes are in part or completely different. Its use in powerful algorithm such as Support Vector Machines (SVMs) allows for fast design of accurate automatic systems.

We report some experiments on question classification, which show an unprecedented result, e.g. 41% of error reduction of the former state-of-the-art, along with the analysis of the nice properties of the approach.

References

  1. M. Baroni, S. Bernardini, A. Ferraresi, and E. Zanchetta. The wacky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation, 43(3):209--226, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M. W. Bilotti, J. L. Elsas, J. Carbonell, and E. Nyberg. Rank learning for factoid question answering with linguistic and semantic constraints. In Proceedings of ACM CIKM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Bloehdorn and A. Moschitti. Combined syntactic and semantic kernels for text classification. In Proceedings of ECIR 2007, Rome, Italy, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Bloehdorn and A. Moschitti. Structure and semantics for expressive text kernels. In Proceedings of CIKM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. E. Charniak. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. In Proceedings of NAACL'00, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Collins and N. Duffy. New Ranking Algorithms for Parsing and Tagging: Kernels over Discrete Structures, and the Voted Perceptron. In Proceedings of ACL'02, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Croce, A. Moschitti, and R. Basili. Structured lexical similarity via convolution kernels on dependency trees. In Proceedings of EMNLP, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK., 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T. Joachims. Estimating the generalization performance of a SVM efficiently. In Proceedings of ICML'00, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. Johansson and A. Moschitti. Reranking models in fine-grained opinion analysis. In Proceedings of Coling 2010, pages 519--527, Beijing, China, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. R. Johansson and A. Moschitti. Syntactic and semantic structure for opinion expression detection. In Proceedings of CoNLL, pages 67--76, Uppsala, Sweden, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. Johansson and A. Moschitti. Extracting opinion expressions and their polarities -- exploration of pipelines and joint models. In Proceedings of ACL-HLT, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Johansson and P. Nugues. Dependency-based syntactic--semantic analysis with PropBank and NomBank. In Proceedings of CoNLL, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. X. Li and D. Roth. Learning question classifiers. In Proceedings of ACL'02, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Moschitti. Efficient convolution kernels for dependency and constituent syntactic trees. In Proceedings of ECML'06, pages 318--329, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Moschitti. Kernel methods, syntax and semantics for relational text categorization. In Proceeding of CIKM '08, NY, USA, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Moschitti, J. Chu-carroll, S. Patwardhan, J. Fan, and G. Riccardi. Using syntactic and semantic structural kernels for classifying definition questions in jeopardy! In Proceedings of EMNLP, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK., 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Moschitti, S. Quarteroni, R. Basili, and S. Manandhar. Exploiting syntactic and shallow semantic kernels for question/answer classification. In Proceedings of ACL'07, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. D. Zhang and W. S. Lee. Question classification using support vector machines. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR. ACM Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Semantic convolution kernels over dependency trees: smoothed partial tree kernel

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader