skip to main content
10.1145/2072069.2072122acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

e-government service development: a success story?

Published:26 September 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper analyses the reform processes linked to the automation of the admission to higher education in Norway. The long development process has included many steps of technical developments, combined with changes in legislation and radical administrative reforms. The analysis aims at identifying the factors that have driven these complex reform processes as well as to reveal who get most value from this system. We found that the system to a certain extent supports a techno-bureaucratic management regime. On the other hand, these reforms have also been beneficial for the individual institutions and not least for the students, in that the application procedures are both faster and simpler. We thus find effects that go beyond the primary goals and can be attributed to the application of new technologies, indicating that such technologies have had vital importance on this reform.

References

  1. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation - Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, (1995), 20(1), 65--91,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Flak, L. S. and Rose, J., Stakeholder Governance: Adapting Stakeholder Theory to EGovernment. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, (2005), vol 16, 31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gjøsten, Kirsti. Senior advisor, Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. Interview 15.06.2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gartner (2007): Worldwide Examples of Public-Value-of-IT Frameworks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fountain, Jane (2001) Building the Virtual State Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, D. C. Brookings Institutions Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jansen, A. and E. Løvdal (2008) Reorganising public agencies -- who is in power? The case of NUCAS --The Universities and College Admission systems. Proceeedings from EGOV 2009, Linz, ISBN 978-3-642-03515-9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kessel, S. (1999) Exercise of judgment in admission of applicants with handicap to higher education. Master Thesis, University of Oslo. See http://www.saf-org.no/gml/kessel.98/09.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Scholl, H. J. (2001). Applying Stakeholder Theory to e-Government: Benefits and Limits. Proceedings of the 1st IFIP Conference on E-Commerce, EBusiness, and EGovernment, (I3E 2001), Zurich, Switzerland. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. e-government service development: a success story?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICEGOV '11: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
        September 2011
        400 pages
        ISBN:9781450307468
        DOI:10.1145/2072069

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 September 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader