skip to main content
10.1145/2072298.2072307acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Visual memes in social media: tracking real-world news in YouTube videos

Published:28 November 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose visual memes, or frequently reposted short video segments, for tracking large-scale video remix in social media. Visual memes are extracted by novel and highly scalable detection algorithms that we develop, with over 96% precision and 80% recall. We monitor real-world events on YouTube, and we model interactions using a graph model over memes, with people and content as nodes, and meme postings as links. This allows us to define several measures of influence. These abstractions, using more than two million video shots from several large-scale event datasets, enable us to quantify and efficiently extract several important observations: over half of the videos contain re-mixed content, which appears rapidly; video view counts, particularly high ones, are poorly correlated with the virality of content; the influence of traditional news media versus citizen journalists varies from event to event; iconic single images of an event are easily extracted; and content that will have long lifespan can be predicted within a day after it first appears. Visual memes can be applied to a number of social media scenarios: brand monitoring, social buzz tracking, ranking content and users, among others.

References

  1. What is the Klout score? Understanding the influence metric. http://klout.com/kscore, retrieved April 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Thanks, YouTube community, for two BIG gifts on our sixth birthday!, May 2011. The official YouTube blog, http://youtube-global.blogspot.com/2011/05/thanks-youtube-community-for-two-big.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. F. Benevenuto, T. Rodrigues, V. Almeida, J. Almeida, and K. Ross. Video interactions in online video social networks. ACM Trans. on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP), 5(4):30, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J.-I. Biel and D. Gatica-Perez. Voices of vlogging. In AAAI Int. Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), 5 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Cha, H. Haddadi, F. Benevenuto, and K. Gummadi. Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy. In 4th Intl. Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Cha, H. Kwak, P. Rodriguez, Y.-Y. Ahn, and S. Moon. I tube, you tube, everybody tubes: Analyzing the world's largest user generated content video system. In Proc. ACM IMC, pages 1--14, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines, 2001. \surlhttp://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/ cjlin/libsvm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Cherubini, R. de Oliveira, and N. Oliver. Understanding near-duplicate videos: A user-centric approach. In Proc. ACM Intl. Conf. on Multimedia, pages 35--44, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. Crane and D. Sornette. Viral, quality, and junk videos on YouTube: Separating content from noise in an information-rich environment. In Proc. of AAAI symposium on Social Information Processing, Menlo Park, CA, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. De Choudhury, H. Sundaram, A. John, and D. D. Seligmann. What makes conversations interesting?: Themes, participants and consequences of conversations in online social media. In WWW, pages 331--340, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. Fawcett. ROC graphs: Notes and practical considerations for researchers. Machine Learning, 31:1--38, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. B. A. Galler and M. J. Fisher. An improved equivalence algorithm. Communications of ACM, 7(5):301--303, 1964. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. C. Gini. Measurement of inequality of ncomes. Economic Journal, 31:124--126, 1921.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. Gladwell. The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Little, Brown and Co., 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. R. Hong, J. Tang, H.-K. Tan, S. Yan, C.-W. Ngo, and T.-S. Chua. Beyond search: Event driven summarization for web videos. ACM Trans. on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Huang, S. Kumar, M. Mitra, W. Zhu, and R. Zabih. Spatial color indexing and applications. International Journal of Computer Vision, 35(3), December 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. L. Kennedy and S.-F. Chang. Internet image archaeology: Automatically tracing the manipulation history of photographs on the web. In Proc. ACM Multimedia, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, , and S. Moon. What is Twitter, a Social Network or a News Media? . In Proc. WWW, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Leskovec, L. Backstrom, and J. Kleinberg. Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In Proc. KDD, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. T. Liu, C. Rosenberg, and H. A. Rowley. Clustering billions of images with large scale nearest neighbor search. In IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Muja and D. G. Lowe. Fast approximate nearest neighbors with automatic algorithm configuration. In Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision Theory and Applications, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A. Natsev, M. Hill, and J. Smith. Design and evaluation of an effective and efficient video copy detection system. In IEEE Intl. Conf. on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. P. Schmitz, P. Shafton, R. Shaw, S. Tripodi, B. Williams, and J. Yang. International remix: Video editing for the web. In Proc. ACM Multimedia, page 798. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. P. Snickars and P. Vonderau. The YouTube Reader. National Library of Sweden, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. G. Szabo and B. A. Huberman. Predicting the popularity of online content. Commun. ACM, 53:80--88, August 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. H.-K. Tan, X. Wu, C.-W. Ngo, and W.-L. Zhao. Accelerating near-duplicate video matching by combining visual similarity and alignment distortion. In Proc. ACM Multimedia, page 861, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. J. Wang, S. Kumar, and S.-F. Chang. Semi-supervised hashing for scalable image retrieval. In IEEE CVPR, San Francisco, USA, June 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Visual memes in social media: tracking real-world news in YouTube videos

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MM '11: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia
      November 2011
      944 pages
      ISBN:9781450306164
      DOI:10.1145/2072298

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 November 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      MM '24
      MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
      October 28 - November 1, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader