skip to main content
10.1145/2090236.2090269acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesitcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the degree of univariate polynomials over the integers

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 January 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We study the following problem raised by von zur Gathen and Roche [GR97]:

What is the minimal degree of a nonconstant polynomial f: {0,...,n} → {0,...,m}?

Clearly, when m = n the function f(x) = x has degree 1. We prove that when m = n - 1 (i.e. the point {n} is not in the range), it must be the case that deg(f) = n - o(n). This shows an interesting threshold phenomenon. In fact, the same bound on the degree holds even when the image of the polynomial is any (strict) subset of {0,...,n}. Going back to the case m = n, as we noted the function f(x) = x is possible, however, we show that if one excludes all degree 1 polynomials then it must be the case that deg(f) = n - o(n). Moreover, the same conclusion holds even if m = O(n1.475--ε). In other words, there are no polynomials of intermediate degrees that map {0,...,n} to {0,...,m}. Furthermore, we give a meaningful answer when m is a large polynomial, or even exponential, in n. Roughly, we show that if m < (n/c d), for some constant c, then either deg(f) ≤ d - 1 (e.g. f(x) = (x-n/2d - 1) is possible) or deg(f) ≥ n/3 - O(d log n). So, again, no polynomial of intermediate degree exists for such m. We achieve this result by studying a discrete version of the problem of giving a lower bound on the minimal L, norm that a monic polynomial of degree d obtains on the interval [-1,1].

We complement these results by showing that for every d = o(√n/log n) there exists a polynomial f: {0,...,n} → {0,...,O(nd+0.5)} of degree n/3 - O(d log n) ≤ deg(f) ≤ n - O(d log (n)).

Our proofs use a variety of techniques that we believe will find other applications as well. One technique shows how to handle a certain set of diophantine equations by working modulo a well chosen set of primes (i.e. a Boolean cube of primes). Another technique shows how to use lattice theory and Minkowski's theorem to prove the existence of a polynomial with certain properties.

References

  1. {BdW02} H. Buhrman and R. de Wolf. Complexity measures and decision tree complexity: a survey. Theor. Comput. Sci., 288(1):21--43, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. {Bei93} R. Beigel. The polynomial method in circuit complexity. In Structure in Complexity Theory Conference, pages 82--95, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. {BHP01} R. C. Baker, G. Harman, and J. Pintz. The difference between consecutive primes, II. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 83:532--562, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. {Cra36} H. Cramér. On the order of magnitude of the difference between consecutive prime numbers. Acta Arithmetica, 2:23--46, 1936.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. {Fel68} W. Feller. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, volume 1. Wiley, New York, 3rd edition, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. {Gol08} O. Goldreich. Computational Complexity: A Conceptual Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. {Gop06} P. Gopalan. Computing with Polynomials over Composites. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, August 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. {GR97} J. von zur Gathen and J. R. Roche. Polynomials with two values. Combinatorica, 17(3):345--362, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. {KLM+09} M. N. Kolountzakis, R. J. Lipton, E. Markakis, A. Mehta, and N. K. Vishnoi. On the fourier spectrum of symmetric boolean functions. Combinatorica, 29(3):363--387, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. {LMN93} N. Linial, Y. Mansour, and N. Nisan. Constant depth circuits, Fourier transform and learnability. J. ACM, 40(3):607--620, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. {Luc78} E. Lucas. Théorie des fonctions numériques simplement périodiques. American Journal of Mathematics, 1(2):184--196, 1878.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. {MG02} D. Micciancio and S. Goldwasser. Complexity of Lattice Problems: a cryptographic perspective, volume 671 of The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, March 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. {MH03} J. C. Mason and D. C. Handscomb. Chebyshev Polynomials. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. {MOS04} E. Mossel, R. O'Donnell, and R. A. Servedio. Learning functions of k relevant variables. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 69(3):421--434, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. {Raz87} A. A. Razborov. Lower bounds on the size of bounded depth circuits over a complete basis with logical addition. Math. Notes, 41(4):333--338, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. {Rob55} H. Robbins. A Remark of Stirling's Formula. American Mathematical Monthly, 62:26--29, 1955.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. {Smo87} R. Smolensky. Algebraic methods in the theory of lower bounds for Boolean circuit complexity. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual STOC, pages 77--82, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. {ST10} A. Shpilka and A. Tal. On the Minimal Fourier Degree of Symmetric Boolean Functions. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), 17:178, 2010. To appear in CCC 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. {VD99} R. Vein and P. Dale. Determinants and Their Applications in Mathematical Physics. Springer, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On the degree of univariate polynomials over the integers

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ITCS '12: Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference
            January 2012
            516 pages
            ISBN:9781450311151
            DOI:10.1145/2090236

            Copyright © 2012 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 8 January 2012

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            ITCS '12 Paper Acceptance Rate39of93submissions,42%Overall Acceptance Rate172of513submissions,34%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader