skip to main content
10.1145/2110363.2110418acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Electronic whiteboards in emergency medicine: a systematic review

Published:28 January 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

As more and more Emergency Departments replace the manual dry-erase whiteboards used for coordination of patient care and communication among clinicians with IT-based electronic whiteboards a need to clarify the effects of implementing these systems arises. This paper seeks to answer this question by systematically reviewing studies on electronic whiteboards. The results of the review indicate that electronic whiteboards influence the work at Emergency Departments in various different ways e.g. changes to work practice and changes to whiteboard information accuracy. Also, the review finds that there are mediating factors that have an impact upon these effects e.g. display format and integration with other clinical IT systems. However, the results are somewhat inconclusive and of a mixed nature and therefore this paper calls for more focused and specific research.

References

  1. Aarts, J., Dooreward, H., Berg, M. 2004. Understanding implementation: the case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 11 (2004), 207--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Abujudeh, H. H., Kaewlai, R., Kodsi, S. E. and Hamill, M. A. 2010. Improving quality of communications in emergency radiology with a computerized whiteboard system. Clinical Radiology 65 (2010), 56--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Aronsky, D., Jones, I., Lanaghan, K. and Slovis, C. M. 2008. Supporting patient care in the emergency department with a computerized whiteboard system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 15 (2008), 184--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bardram, J. E., Hansen, T. R. and Soegaard, M. 2006. AwareMedia - A shared interactive display supporting social, temporal and spatial awareness in surgery. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work (2006). ACM, New York, NY, 109--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Belser, D., Aronsky, D., Dilts, D. M. and Ferreira, J. 2005. Developing an emergency department information system. In Transforming health care through information, N. M. Lorenzi, J. S. Ash, J. Einbinder, W. McPhee, L. Einbinder, Eds. Springer Science+Business Media, New York, NY, 69--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg, M. 2001. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics 64 (2001), 143--156Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bisantz, A. M., Pennathur, P. R., Guarrera, T. K., Fairbanks, R. J., Perry, S. J., Zwemer, F. and Wears, R. L. 2010. Emergency department status boards: A case study in information systems transition. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 4 (2010), 39--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Boger, E. 2003. Electronic tracking board reduces ED patient length of stay at Indiana hospital. Journal of Emergency Nursing 29 (2003) 39--43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Bødker, K., Kensing, F., Simonsen J. 2006. Participatory IT design: Designing for Business and Workplace Realities. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fairbanks, R. J., Guarrera, T. K., Karn, K. S., Caplan, S. H., Shah, M. N. and Wears, R. L. 2008. Interface design characteristics of a popular emergency department information system. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting (2008). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, 778--782.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. France, D. J., Levin, S., Hemphill, R., Chen, K., Rickard, D., Makowski, R., Jones, I. and Aronsky, D. 2005. Emergency physicians' behaviors and workload in the presence of an electronic whiteboard. International Journal of Medical Informatics 74 (2005), 827--837.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Gorsha, N., Stogoski, J. 2006. Transforming emergency care through an innovative tracking technology: An emergency department's extreme makeover. Journal of Emergency Nursing 32 (2006), 254--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Greenbaum, J. M., Kyng, M. 1991. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hertzum, M. and Simonsen, J. 2010. Clinical overview and emergency-department whiteboards: A survey of expectations towards electronic whiteboards. In Proceedings of the 8th Scandinavian Conference on Health Informatics (Copenhagen, DK, August 23-24, 2010). SHI '10. Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim, NO, 14--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Horak, D. 2000. Designing and implementing a computerized tracking system: The experience at one level I trauma center emergency department. Journal of Emergency Nursing 26 (2000), 473--476.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Jensen, J. 2004. United hospital increases capacity usage, efficiency with patient-flow management system. Journal of Healthcare Information Management 18 (2004), 26--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kitchenham, B. A. 2004. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Joint Technical Report, Computer Science Department, Keele University (TR/SE-0401) and National ICT Australia Ltd. (0400011T.1) (2004)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kujala, S. 2003. User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges. Behavior and Information Technology 22 (2003), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Lasome, C. E. and Xiao, Y. 2001. Large public display boards: A case study of an OR board and design implications. In Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium (Washington, DC, November 3-7, 2001). AMIA '01. 349--353.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Mcgrath, J. E. 1981. Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist 25 (1981), 179--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Nicholls, A. G. and Young, F. R. 2007. Innovative hospital bed management using spatial technology. Spatial Science Queensland 2 (2007), 26--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Patterson, E. S., Rogers, M. L., Tomolo, A. M., Wears, R. L and Tsevat, J. 2010. Comparison of extent of use, information accuracy and functions for manual and electronic patient status boards. International Journal of Medical Informatics 79 (2010), 817--823.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Pennathur, P. R., Bisantz, A. M., Fairbanks, R. J., Perry, S. J., Zwemer, F. and Wears, R. L. 2007. Assessing the impact of computerization on work practice: Information technology in emergency departments. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51st Annual Meeting (2007). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, 377--381.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Pennathur P. R., Guerrera, T. K., Bisantz, A. M., Fairbanks, R. J., Perry, S. J. and Wears, R. L. 2008. Cognitive artifacts in transition: An analysis of information content changes between manual and electronic patient tracking systems. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting (2008). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, 363--367.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Potter, M. 2005. The Tracking Board. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal 27 (2005), 145--156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Rasmussen, R., Fleron, B., Hertzum, M. and Simonsen, J. 2010. Balancing tradition and transcendence in the implementation of emergency-department electronic whiteboards. In Selected Papers of the Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia 2010, J. Molka-Danielsen, H. W. Nicolaisen, and J. S. Persson, Eds. Tapir Academic Publishers, Trondheim, NO, 73--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Rasmussen, R., Christensen, A. S., Fjeldsted, T. and Hertzum, M. 2011. Selecting users for participation in IT projects: Trading a representative sample for advocates and champions? Interacting with Computers 23 (2011), 176--187. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. 5th Edition. Free Press, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosenthal, R., Persinger, G. W., Vikan-Kline, L. L. and Fode, K. L. 1963. The effect of experimenter outcome-bias and subject set on awareness in verbal conditioning experiments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 2 (1963), 275--283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Rosenthal, R. and Rubin, D. B. 1978, Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies. The behavioral and brain sciences 3 (1978), 377--415.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. and Davis, F. D. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 (2003), 425--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Wears, R. L. and Perry, S. J. 2003. A comparison of manual and electronic status boards in the emergency department: What's gained and what's lost? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (2003). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, 1415--1419.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Wears, R. L. and Perry, S. J. 2007a. Status boards in accident emergency departments: Support for shared cognition. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 8 (2007), 371--380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Wears, R. L., Perry S. J., Wilson, S., Galliers, J. and Fone, J. 2007b. Emergency department status boards: User evolved artefacts for intra- and intra-group coordination. Cognition, Technology and Work 9 (2007), 164--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Wiler, J. L., Gentle, C., Halfpenny, J. M., Heins, A., Mehrotra, A., Mikhail, M. G. and Fite, D. 2010. Optimizing emergency department front-end operations. Annals of Emergency Medicine 55 (2010), 142--160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Wong, H. J., Caesar, M., Bandali, S., Agnew, J. and Abrams, H. 2009. Electronic inpatient whiteboards: Improving multidisciplinary communication and coordination of care. International Journal of Medical Informatics 78 (2009), 239--247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Xiao, Y., Schenkel, S., Faraj, S., Mackenzie, C. F. and Moss, J. 2007. What whiteboards in a trauma center operating suite can teach us about emergency department communication. Annals of emergency medicine 50 (2007), 387--395.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Zimmerman, M. and Clinton, J. E. 1995, Computerized tracking, triage and registration. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal 17 (1995), 49--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Electronic whiteboards in emergency medicine: a systematic review

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IHI '12: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium
      January 2012
      914 pages
      ISBN:9781450307819
      DOI:10.1145/2110363

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 January 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader