skip to main content
10.1145/2110497.2110506acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Object reuse and exchange for publishing and sharing workflows

Published:14 November 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

The workflow paradigm can provide the means to describe the complete functional pipeline for a scientific experiment and therefore expose the underlying scientific processes for enabling the reproducibility of results. However, current means for exposing such information are tied closely to the individual workflow engines and there is no existing method that provides a common way to share this information.

In this paper, we discuss a lightweight approach that can be used to expose such information, using the Open Archives Initiative Object Reuse and Exchange (ORE) standard, to provide a common format for representing and sharing workflows and their associated metadata required for their execution.

We describe how workflows can be mapped to the ORE format using RDF and how they can be stored using bundles for sharing with others. We discuss tooling we have developed that provides a mechanism for existing workflow engines to conveniently export workflows as ORE bundles. We present three use cases for Triana, ASKALON and MOTEUR, where such integration has already been undertaken, and conclude the paper by providing a short study showing that the overhead implications of adopting the proposed ORE bundling format are minimal.

References

  1. Open Archives Initiative. Object, Reuse and Exchange (ORE). http://www.openarchives.org/ore/, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. The SHaring Interoperable Workflows for large-scale scientific simulations on Available DCIs Project . http://www.shiwa-workflow.eu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://www.w3.org/RDF/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ian Taylor, Matthew Shields, Ian Wang, and Andrew Harrison. Visual Grid Workflow in Triana. Journal of Grid Computing, 3(3--4):153--169, September 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrew Harrison, Ian Taylor, Ian Wang, and Matthew Shields. WS-RF Workflow in Triana. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 22(3):268--283, August 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Tristan Glatard, Johan Montagnat, Diane Lingrand, and Xavier Pennec. Flexible and efficient workflow deployment of data-intensive applications on grids with moteur. Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl., 22:347--360, August 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Marek Wieczorek, Radu Prodan, and Thomas Fahringer. Scheduling of scientific workflows in the askalon grid environment. SIGMOD Rec., 34:56--62, September 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. I. Altintas, C. Berkley, E. Jaeger, M. Jones, B. Ludascher, and S. Mock. Kepler: An Extensible System for Design and Execution of Scientific Workflows. In 16th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM), pages 423--424. IEEE Computer Society, New York, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. E. Deelman, G. Singh, M.-H. Su, J. Blythe, Y. Gil, C. Kesselman, G. Mehta, K. Vahi, G. B. Berriman, J. Good, A. Laity, J. C. Jacob, and D.S. Katz. Pegasus: a Framework for Mapping Complex Scientific Workflows onto Distributed Systems. Scientific Programming Journal, 13(3):219--237, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Peter Kacsuk. P-grade portal family for grid infrastructures. Concurr. Comput. : Pract. Exper., 23:235--245, March 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Tom Oinn, Matthew Addis, Justin Ferris, Darren Marvin, Martin Senger, Mark Greenwood, Tim Carver, Kevin Glover, Matthew R. Pocock, Anil Wipat, and Peter Li. Taverna: A Tool for the Composition and Enactment of Bioinformatics Workflows. Bioinformatics, 20(17):3045--3054, November 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Roger Barga, Jared Jackson, Nelson Araujo, Dean Guo, Nitin Gautam, and Yogesh Simmhan. The trident scientific workflow workbench. In Proceedings of the 2008 Fourth IEEE International Conference on eScience, pages 317--318, Washington, DC, USA, 2008. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Andrew Harrison and Ian Taylor. Web enabling desktop workflow applications. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sean Bechhofer, John Ainsworth, Jitenkumar Bhagat, Iain Buchan, Phillip Couch, Don Cruickshank, Mark Delderfield, Ian Dunlop, Matthew Gamble, Carole Goble, Danius Michaelides, Paolo Missier, Stuart Owen, David Newman, David De Roure, and Shoaib Sufi. Why linked data is not enough for scientists. In Sixth IEEE e-Science conference (e-Science 2010), August 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. David De Roure, Carole Goble, and Robert Stevens. Designing the myexperiment virtual research environment for the social sharing of workflows. In Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing, pages 603--610, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. ST. Peltier, AW. Lin, D. Lee, S. Mock, S. Lamont, T. Molina, M. Wong, ME. Martone, and MH. Ellisman. The Telescience Portal for Advanced Tomography Applications. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Applications, 63(5):539--550, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Paul Groth, Ewa Deelman, Gideon Juve, Gaurang Mehta, and Bruce Berriman. Pipeline-centric provenance model. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, WORKS '09, pages 4:1--4:8, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Attila Kertész, Gergely Sipos, and Péter Kacsuk. Brokering Multi-grid Workflows in the P-GRADE Portal. In Euro-Par 2006: Parallel Processing, volume 4375, pages 138--149. Springer, Berlin, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI). http://dublincore.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Friend of a Friend (FOAF). http://www.foaf-project.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS), 2009. http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. SHIWA Desktop - D5.3. http://www.shiwa-workflow.eu/documents/10753/8bc729cf-34ac-4bfe-bb96--9c%e8ebf9f8ca.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Object reuse and exchange for publishing and sharing workflows

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                WORKS '11: Proceedings of the 6th workshop on Workflows in support of large-scale science
                November 2011
                154 pages
                ISBN:9781450311007
                DOI:10.1145/2110497

                Copyright © 2011 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 14 November 2011

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate30of54submissions,56%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader