skip to main content
10.1145/2132176.2132178acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiconferenceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Activities & artifacts: the dual nature of image-making in communicative practice

Published:07 February 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Selected findings are presented from a preliminary qualitative investigation of image-making as information-driven communicative practice. Ad hoc visualizations are images spontaneously created during the natural flow of a conversation (e.g., napkin drawings). The activity of drawing in these situations is an informal information sharing practice occurring within an interactive, dynamic context. A discourse-oriented methodology is described for the direct observation and analysis of drawing during face-to-face conversations. Analysis of fifteen video-recorded conversations used an iterative, grounded theory approach to multimodal social interactional analysis. The dual nature of drawing as both information artifact and communicative activity is discussed in terms of contrasting affordances exploited during specific drawing episodes in the data. These findings have implications for image representation and the development of visually enabled information and communication technologies.

References

  1. Beaudoin, J. The influence of domain knowledge, indexer experience and image type on image indexing, Proceedings of the 19th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST) Special Interest Group in Classification Research., 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Charmaz, K. The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. in Emerson, R. M. ed. Contemporary Field Research, University fo California, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL, 1983, 109--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cook, M. P. Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90 (6).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Datta, R., Joshi, D., Li, J. and Wang, J. Z. Image retrieval: Ideas, influences, and trends of the new age. ACM Computing Surveys, 40 (2, Article 5). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Elkins, J. (ed.), The Domain of Images. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellis, G. and Dix, A. An explorative analysis of user evaluation studies in information visualisation. Proceedings of BELIV 2006: AVI Workshop. 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gibson, J. J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Golomb, C. The Child's Creation of a Pictorial World. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Greisdorf, H. and O'Connor, B. Modelling what users see when they look at images: a cognitive viewpoint. Journal of Documentation, 58 (1). 6--29Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Greisdorf, H. and O'Connor, B. What Do Users See? Exploring the cognitive nature of functional image retrieval. Proceedings of ASIST'02.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanks, W. F. Language & Communicative Practices. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris, B. R. Visual information literacy via visual means: three heuristics. Reference services review, 34 (2). 213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison, A. G. and Treagust, D. F. Learning about Atoms, Molecules, and Chemical Bonds: A Case Study of Multiple-Model Use in Grade 11 Chemistry. Science Education, 84 (3). 352--381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Heer, J., Viégas, F. B. and Wattenberg, M. Voyagers and voyeurs: supporting asynchronous collaborative information visualization. Communications of the ACM, 52 (1). 87--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Huang, W., Eades, P. and Hong, S.-H., Beyond Time and Error: A Cognitive Approach to the Evaluation of graph Drawings. in BELIV '08, (Florence, Italy, 2008), ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jorgensen, C. Attributes of Images in Describing Tasks. Information Processing & Management, 34 (2/3). 161--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jorgensen, C. Image retrieval: Theory and research. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Liebenberg, L., Didkowsky, N. and Ungar, M. Analysing image-based data using grounded theory. Visual Studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu, Y., Zhang, D., Lu, G. and Ma, W. A survey of content-based image retrieval with high-level semantics. Pattern Recognition, 40 (1). 262--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. McCay-Peet, L. and Toms, E. Image use within the work task model: Images as information and illustration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 60 (12). 2416--2429. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Naps, T., Roflling, G., Anderson, J., Cooper, S., Dann, W., Fleischer, R., Koldehofe, B., Korhonen, A., Kuittinen, M. and Leska, C. Evaluating the Educational Impact of Visualization. SIGCSE Bulletin, 35 (4). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Norman, D. A. Affordance, conventions, and design. interactions, 6 (3). 38--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Norman, D. A. The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books, New York, NY, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Norris, S. Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge, New York and London, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Ochs, E. Transcription as theory. Developmental pragmatics. 43--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Shneiderman, B. and Plaisant, C. Strategies for Evaluating Information Visualization Tools: Multi-dimensional In-Depth Long-term Case Studies. Proceedings of BELIV '06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Snyder, J. Image-Enabled Discourse: A Conceptual Framework International Visual Sociology Association (IVSA) Conference, July 6--8, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Snyder, J. Image-Making as Discourse Strategy 17th Annual Conference on Language, Interaction and Social Organization (LISO), May 12--14, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Tufte, E. R. Envisioning Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, Connecticut, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Tufte, E. R. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, Connecticut, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Tufte, E. R. Visual Explanations. Graphics Press, Cheshire, Connecticut, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Weedman, J. Thinking with images: An exploration into information retrieval and knowledge generation. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39 (1). 376--382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    iConference '12: Proceedings of the 2012 iConference
    February 2012
    667 pages
    ISBN:9781450307826
    DOI:10.1145/2132176

    Copyright © 2012 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 7 February 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader