skip to main content
10.1145/2132176.2132203acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiconferenceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Extreme ethnography: challenges for research in large scale online environments

Published:07 February 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Large scale online environments, such as social networks, present an emerging phenomenon where millions of people come together online to share and consume information and socialize. In the past, ethnography was used extensively to provide a nuanced understanding of the relationship between technology and humans. The ways of "doing ethnography" have gone through several changes in order to fit the spatial and temporal nature of online research. While these instantiations of ethnography are important, the scale and constant change of these environments pose considerable challenges for ethnographic research: users come and go, and so do applications and content. The contribution of this paper is in articulating the methodological challenges stemming from the characteristics of large scale online environments, and in calling for rethinking of the strategies and methods for effective ethnography in these environments.

References

  1. Morris, M., Teevan, J. and Panovich, K. What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message q&a behavior. ACM, City, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Online Activities 2000--2009. Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington DC, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Geertz, C. The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Patton, M. Q. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications, Inc., 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dorr-Bremme, D. W. Ethnographic evaluation: A theory and method. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 7, 1 1985), 65--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Courtright, C. Context in information behavior research. Annual review of information science and technology, 41, 1 2007), 273--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Druin, A., Foss, E., Hutchinson, H., Golub, E. and Hatley, L. Children's roles using keyword search interfaces at home. ACM, City, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Solomon, P. Information behavior in sense making: A three-year case study of work planning. City, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Star, S. L. The ethnography of infrastructure. American behavioral scientist, 43, 3 1999), 377.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dourish, P. Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hammersley, M. Ethnography: Problems and prospects. Ethnography and Education, 1, 1 2006), 3--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Garcia, A. C., Standlee, A. I. and Bechkoff, J. Ethnographic approaches to the Internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38, 1 2009), 52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Baym, N. K. Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. Sage Publications, Inc., 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Boyd, D. Why youth social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning2007), 119--142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nardi, B. A. My life as a night elf priest: An anthropological account of World of Warcraft. Univ of Michigan Pr, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Krishnamurthy, B., Gill, P. and Arlitt, M. A few chirps about twitter. ACM, City, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Cha, M., Kwak, H., Rodriguez, P., Ahn, Y. Y. and Moon, S. I tube, you tube, everybody tubes: analyzing the world's largest user generated content video system. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement (San Diego, CA, 2007). ACM, {insert City of Publication}, {insert 2007 of Publication}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Priedhorsky, R., Chen, J., Lam, S. K., Panciera, K., Terveen, L. and Riedl, J. Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, 2007). ACM, {insert City of Publication}, {insert 2007 of Publication}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kozinets, R. V. Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage Publications Ltd, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Millen, D. R. Rapid ethnography: time deepening strategies for HCI field research. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (New York City, New York, United States, 2000). ACM, {insert City of Publication}, {insert 2000 of Publication}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Noblit, G. W. The prospects of an applied ethnography for education: A sociology of knowledge interpretation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6, 1 1984), 95--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Markham, A. N. The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. Handbook of qualitative research,2005), 793--820.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Bryman, A. The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: a question of method or epistemology? British Journal of Sociology1984), 75--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Atkinson, P. and Hammersley, M. Ethnography and participant observation. Handbook of qualitative research, 11994), 248--261.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Turkle, S. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. Simon and Schuster, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Marcus, G. E. Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual review of anthropology1995), 95--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Maloney-Krichmar, D. and Preece, J. A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12, 2 2005), 201--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Howard, P. N. Network ethnography and the hypermedia organization: new media, new organizations, new methods. New Media & Society, 4, 4 2002), 550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Rotman, D., Golbeck, J. and Preece, J. The community is where the rapport is--on sense and structure in the youtube community. ACM, City, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Geiger, R. S. and Ribes, D. The work of sustaining order in wikipedia: the banning of a vandal. ACM, City, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Zhou, L. and Hovy, E. On the summarization of dynamically introduced information: Online discussions and blogs. City, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin, J., Snow, R. and Morgan, W. Smoothing Techniques for Adaptive Online Language Models: Topic Tracking in Tweet Streams2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T. and Tseng, B. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. ACM, City, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Agrawal, R., Rajagopalan, S., Srikant, R. and Xu, Y. Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior. ACM, City, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Verma, S., Vieweg, S., Corvey, W. J., Palen, L., Martin, J. H., Palmer, M., Schram, A. and Anderson, K. M. Natural Language Processing to the Rescue? Extracting "Situational Awareness" Tweets During Mass Emergency2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Becker, H., Naaman, M. and Gravano, L. Event identification in social media. Citeseer, City, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Mullen, T. and Malouf, R. Taking sides: User classification for informal online political discourse. Internet Research, 182008), 177--190.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Extreme ethnography: challenges for research in large scale online environments

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      iConference '12: Proceedings of the 2012 iConference
      February 2012
      667 pages
      ISBN:9781450307826
      DOI:10.1145/2132176

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 February 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader