skip to main content
10.1145/2132176.2132213acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiconferenceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Methodologies in the digital humanities for analyzing aural patterns in texts

Published:07 February 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Increased access to large-scale repositories of text begs questions about how scholars can use such repositories in their research. It is essential that iSchools are aware of tools being created in the Digital Humanities since the processes and tools that are being developed by this transdisciplinary community are changing the preservation and curation of humanities data. This paper will discuss a use-case study that uses theories of knowledge representation and research on phonetic symbolism to develop analytics and visualizations that help users examine aural patterns in text. This work includes (1) identifying OpenMary as a base analytic; (2) creating a routine in MEANDRE (a semantic-web-driven data-intensive flow execution environment) that produces a tabular representation of the data for predictive modeling; and (4) developing an interface (ProseVis) for seeing these comparisons across text collections.

References

  1. Adding support for a new language to MARY TTS. MARY Text To Speech. Accessed September 8, 2011. http://mary.opendfki.de/wiki/NewLanguageSupport.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernstein, C. 1998. Close Listening: Poetry and the Performed Word. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bolinger, D. 1986. Intonation and Its Parts: Melody in Spoken English. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Clement, T. 2008. 'A thing not beginning or ending': Using Digital Tools to Distant-Read Gertrude Stein's The Making of Americans. Literary and Linguistic Computing 23,3 (2008), 361--382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cole, J. 2011. Respondent to Rooth, M. and Wagner, M. Harvesting Speech Datasets for Linguistic Research on the Web. Digging Into Data Conference. National Endowment for the Humanities. Washington, DC (June 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, R., Shrobe R. H. and Szolovits, P. 1993. What is a Knowledge Representation? AI Magazine, 14, 1 (1993), 17--33. Accessed August 31, 2011. http://www.medg.lcs.mit.edu/ftp/psz/k-rep.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Drucker, J. 2011. Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display. Digital Humanities Quarterly. 5, 1 (Winter 2011). Accessed August 31, 2011. http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Flanders, J. 2011. The Productive Unease of 21st-century Digital Scholarship. Digital Humanities Quarterly 3,3 (2009). Accessed August 31, 2011. http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/3/000055/000055.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. McGann, J. 2005. Culture and Technology: The Way We Live Now, What Is to Be Done? New Literary History 36, 1 (2005), 71--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Meyer, S. 2001. Irresistible Dictation: Gertrude Stein and the Correlations of Writing and Science. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Murphy, M. S. (1991). "Familiar Strangers": The Household Words of Gertrude Stein's "Tender Buttons." Contemporary Literature. 32, 3 (Autumn, 1991), 383--402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ong, W. J. 2002. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London; New York: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Peterson, C. L. 1996. The Remaking of Americans: Gertrude Stein's "Melanctha" and African-American Musical Traditions. In Criticism and the Color Line: Desegregating American Literary Studies, ed. Henry B (ed.) Wonham, 140--157. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers UP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Plamondon, M. R. 2006. "Virtual Verse Analysis: Analysing Patterns in Poetry." Literary and Linguistic Computing 21 (March 7): 127--141. doi:10.1093/llc/fql011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Plamondon, M. R. 2006. Virtual Verse Analysis: Analysing Patterns in Poetry. Literary and Linguistic Computing 21 (March 7), 127--141. doi:10.1093/llc/fql011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sapir, E. 1929. A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 225--239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Saussure, F. D. 1916. Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Shrum, L. J. and Tina J. Lowrey. 2007. Sounds Convey Meaning: The Implications of Phonetic Symbolism for Brand Name Construction. In Psycholinguistic Phenomena in Marketing Communications, ed. Tina M. Lowrey, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 39--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Smolinsky, S. and Sokoloff, C. 2006. Introducing the Pattern-Finder. Conference Abstracts, Digital Humanities Conference, Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sowa, J. F. 2000. Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing Co. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Turner, A. M. 1905. The New England Cook Book: The Latest and the Best Methods for Economy and Luxury at Home. Boston: Chas. E. Brown.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Unsworth, J. 2002. What is Humanities Computing, and What is Not? In Jahrbuch für Computerphilologie 4, Georg Braungart, Karl Eibl and Fotis Jannidis, eds. Paderborn: mentis Verlag 2002. Accessed September 8, 2011. http://computerphilologie.uni-muenchen.de/jg02/unsworth.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Methodologies in the digital humanities for analyzing aural patterns in texts

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          iConference '12: Proceedings of the 2012 iConference
          February 2012
          667 pages
          ISBN:9781450307826
          DOI:10.1145/2132176

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 February 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader