skip to main content
10.1145/2145204.2145351acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Searching for the goldilocks zone: trade-offs in managing online volunteer groups

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 February 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Dedicated and productive members who actively contribute to community efforts are crucial to the success of online volunteer groups such as Wikipedia. What predicts member productivity? Do productive members stay longer? How does involvement in multiple projects affect member contribution to the community? In this paper, we analyze data from 648 WikiProjects to address these questions. Our results reveal two critical trade-offs in managing online volunteer groups. First, factors that increase member productivity, measured by the number of edits on Wikipedia articles, also increase likelihood of withdrawal from contributing, perhaps due to feelings of mission accomplished or burnout. Second, individual membership in multiple projects has mixed effects. It decreases the amount of work editors contribute to both the individual projects and Wikipedia as a whole. It increases withdrawal for each individual project yet reduces withdrawal from Wikipedia. We discuss how our findings expand existing theories to fit the online context and inform the design of new tools to improve online volunteer work.

References

  1. Albanese, R. and Van Fleet, D.D. Rational Behavior in Groups: The Free-Riding Tendency. Academy of Management Review, 10, 2 (1985), 244--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Arnold, H.J. and Feldman, D.C. A Multivariate Analysis of the Determinants of Job Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 3 (1982), 350--360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Arthur, J.B. Effects of Human Resource Systems on Manufacturing Performance and Turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 3 (1994), 670--687.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bakker, A.B., Van Der Zee, K.I., Lewig, K.A., and Dollard, M.F. The Relationship Between the Big Five Personality Factors and Burnout: A Study Among Volunteer Counselors. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 1 (2007), 31--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Barron, D.N., West, E., and Hannan, M.T. A Time to Grow and a Time to Die: Growth and Mortality of Credit Unions in New York City, 1914--1990. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 2 (1994), 381--421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Becker, G.S. A theory of the Allocation of Time. The Economic Journal, 75, 299 (1965), 493--517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Beehr, T.A. and Gupta, N. A Note on the Structure of Employee Withdrawal. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 1 (1978), 73--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bryk, A.S. and Raudenbush, S.W. Hierarchical Linear Models for Social and Behavioural Research: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications (1992).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R. Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection. Sociological Methods Research, 33 (2004), 261--304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Butler, B.S. Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures. Information Systems Research, 12, 4 (2001), 346--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Butler, B.S., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., and Kraut, R.E. Community Effort in Online Groups: Who Does the Work and Why? In S. Weisband & L. Atwater (Eds.), Leadership at a Distance. Lawrence Erlbuam Associates (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, J., Ren, Y., and Riedl, J. The effects of diversity on group productivity and member withdrawal in online volunteer groups. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Cordes, C.L. and Dougherty, T.W. A Review and An Integration of Research on Job Burnout. Academy of Management Review, 18, 4 (1993), 621--656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., and Riedl, J. Using intelligent task routing and contribution review to help communities build artifacts of lasting value. In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Cotton, J.L. and Tuttle, J.M. Employee Turnover: A Meta-Analysis and Review with Implications for Research. Academy of Management Review, 11, 1 (1986), 55--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Cross, R. and Cummings, J.N. Tie and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Work. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 6 (2004), 928--937.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Daniel, S.L. and Diamant, E.I. Network Effects in OSS Development: The Impact of Users and Developers on Project Performance. ICIS 2008 Proceedings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Farmer, S.M. and Fedor, D.B. Volunteer Participation and Withdrawal: A Psychological Contract Perspective on the Role of Expectations and Organizational Support. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9 (1999), 349--368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Griffeth, R.W., Hom, P.W., and Gaertner, S. A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests, and Research Implications for the Next Millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 3 (2000), 463--488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Halfaker, A., Kittur, A., Riedl, J. Don't Bite the Newbies: How Reverts Affect the Quantity and Quality of Wikipedia Work. In WikiSym 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Haythornthwaite, C. Crowds and Communities: Light and Heavyweight Models of Peer Production. In Proc. HICSS 2009, IEEE (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hofmann, DA., Jacobs, R., and Gerras, S.J. Mapping individual performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 2 (1992), 185--195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Kittur, A. and Kraut, R.E. Harnessing the Wisdom of Crowds in Wikipedia: Quality Through Coordination. In Proc. CSCW 2008, ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kittur, A., and Kraut, R.E. Beyond Wikipedia: coordination and conflict in online production groups. In Proc. CSCW 2010, ACM Press (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Kittur, A., Chi, E., Pendleton, B.A., Suh, B., and Mytkowicz, T. Power of the Few vs. Wisdom of the Crowd: Wikipedia and the Rise of the Bourgeoisie. Alt.CHI at CHI 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kittur, A., Suh, B., Pendleton, B.A., and Chi, E.H. He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Lyubomirsky, S. and Nolen-Hoeksema, S. Effects of Self-Focused Rumination on Negative Thinking and Interpersonal Problem Solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1 (1995), 176--190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Markus, M.L. Toward a "Critical Mass" Theory of Interactive Media. Communication Research, 14, 5 (1987), 491--511.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. McEvoy, G.M. and Cascio, W.F. Do Good or Poor Performers Leave? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Performance and Turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 4 (1987), 744--762.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. McPherson, J.M., Popielarz, P.A., and Drobnic, S. Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics. American Psychological Review, 57, 2 (1992), 153--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., and Cook, J.M. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27 (2001), 415--444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Mitchell, T.R., Holtom, B.C., Lee, T.W., Sablynski, C.J., and Erez, M. 2001. Why People Stay: Using Job Embeddedness to Predict Voluntary Turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 6 (2001), 1102--1121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. O'Reilly, C.A., III, Caldwell, D.F., and Barnett, W.P. Work Group Demography, Social Integration, and Turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 1 (1989), 21--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Priedhorsky, R., Chen, J., Lam, S.K., Panciera, K., Terveen, L., and Riedl, J. Creating, Destroying, and Restoring Value in Wikipedia. In Proc. GROUP 2007, ACM Press (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Randel, A.E. and Jaussi, K.S. Functional Background Identity, Diversity, and Individual Performance in Cross-Functional Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 6 (2003), 763--774.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Robles, G., Gonzalez-Barahona J.M., Michlmayr, M. Evolution of Volunteer Participation in Libre Software Projects: Evidence from Debian. In Proc. First International Conference on Open Source Systems 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Spencer, D.G. and Steers, R.M. Performance as a Moderator of the Job Satisfaction-Turnover Relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66 (1981), 511--514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Sturman, M.C. Searching for the Inverted U-Shaped Relationship Between Time and Performance: Meta-Analyses of the Experience/Performance, Tenure/ Performance, and Age/Performance Relationships. Journal of Management, 9, 5 (2003), 609--640.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Suh, B., Convertino, G., Chi., E.H., and Pirolli, P. The Singularity is Not Near: Slowing Growth of Wikipedia. In Proc. WikiSym2009, ACM Press (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Taylor, L.C. Thousands of Editors Leaving Wikipedia. Thestar.com, Nov. 23 (2009). http://www.thestar.com/news/sciencetech/technology/article/729552--thousands-of-editors-leaving-wikipedia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Wagner, W.G., Pfeffer, J., and O'Reilly, C.A., III. Organizational Demography and Turnover in Top-Management Group. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 1 (1984), 74--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Wilson, J. Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26 (2000), 215--240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Searching for the goldilocks zone: trade-offs in managing online volunteer groups

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '12: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
      February 2012
      1460 pages
      ISBN:9781450310864
      DOI:10.1145/2145204

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 February 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '12 Paper Acceptance Rate164of415submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader