skip to main content
10.1145/2187836.2187896acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Leveraging user comments for aesthetic aware image search reranking

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 April 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The increasing number of images available online has created a growing need for efficient ways to search for relevant content. Text-based query search is the most common approach to retrieve images from the Web. In this approach, the similarity between the input query and the metadata of images is used to find relevant information. However, as the amount of available images grows, the number of relevant images also increases, all of them sharing very similar metadata but differing in other visual characteristics. This paper studies the influence of visual aesthetic quality in search results as a complementary attribute to relevance. By considering aesthetics, a new ranking parameter is introduced aimed at improving the quality at the top ranks when large amounts of relevant results exist. Two strategies for aesthetic rating inference are proposed: one based on visual content, another based on the analysis of user comments to detect opinions about the quality of images. The results of a user study with $58$ participants show that the comment-based aesthetic predictor outperforms the visual content-based strategy, and reveals that aesthetic-aware rankings are preferred by users searching for photographs on the Web.

References

  1. R. Datta, D. Joshi, J. Li, and J. Z. Wang. Studying Aesthetics in Photographic Images Using a Computational Approach. In ECCV'06, volume 3953 of L.N. in Computer Science, pages 288--301. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Hasler and S. Susstrunk. Measuring colorfulness in real images. volume 5007, pages 87--95, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. W. H. Hsu, L. S. Kennedy, and S. F. Chang. Video search reranking via information bottleneck principle. In ACM Multimedia '06, pages 35--44, NY, USA, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. K. Q. Huang, Q. Wang, and Z. Y. Wu. Natural color image enhancement and evaluation algorithm based on human visual system. Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 103(1):52--63, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. V. Jain and M. Varma. Learning to re-rank: query-dependent image re-ranking using click data. In Proc. ACM Conf. on World wide web, WWW '11, pages 277--286, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. W. Jin, H. H. Ho, and R. K. Srihari. OpinionMiner: a novel machine learning system for web opinion mining and extraction. In Proc. ACM SIGKDD, KDD '09, pages 1195--1204, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Y. Jing and S. Baluja. Pagerank for product image search. In Proc. ACM Conf. on World Wide Web, WWW '08, pages 307--316, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Y. Ke, X. Tang, and F. Jing. The Design of High-Level Features for Photo Quality Assessment. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, 1:419--426, June 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. W. K. Leung, S. C. F. Chan, F. L. Chung, and G. Ngai. A probabilistic rating inference framework for mining user preferences from reviews. World Wide Web, 14(2):187--215, Mar. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Luo and X. Tang. Photo and Video Quality Evaluation: Focusing on the Subject. In ECCV '08, pages 386--399, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Obrador, X. Anguera, R. de Oliveira, and N. Oliver. The role of tags and image aesthetics in social image search. In WSM '09, pages 65--72, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Obrador, L. Schmidt-Hackenberg, and N. Oliver. The role of image composition in image aesthetics. In IEEE ICIP 2010, pages 3185--3188, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. R. Orendovici and J. Z. Wang. Training data collection system for a learning-based photographic aesthetic quality inference engine. In ACM Multimedia'10, pages 1575--1578, NY, USA, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. B. Pang and L. Lee. Seeing stars: exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '05, pages 115--124, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2005. Association for Computational Linguistics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. G. Peters. Aesthetic Primitives of Images for Visualization. In IEEE Int. Conf. Information Visualization, 2007, pages 316--325, July 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. San Pedro and S. Siersdorfer. Ranking and classifying attractiveness of photos in folksonomies. In Proc. ACM conf. on World wide web, WWW '09, pages 771--780, NY, USA, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. N. Sawant, J. Li, and J. Z. Wang. Automatic image semantic interpretation using social action and tagging data. Multimedia Tools Appl., 51(1):213--246, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Smola and B. Schölkopf. A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and Computing, 14(3):199--222, Aug. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. R. van Zwol, A. Rae, and L. G. Pueyo. Prediction of favourite photos using social, visual, and textual signals. In ACM Multimedia'10, pages 1015--1018, NY, USA, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M. Wang, B. Liu, and X. S. Hua. Accessible image search. In ACM Multimedia'09, pages 291--300, NY, USA, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. L. Yang and A. Hanjalic. Supervised reranking for web image search. In ACM Multimedia'10, pages 183--192, NY, USA, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. C. H. Yeh, Y. C. Ho, B. A. Barsky, and M. Ouhyoung. Personalized photograph ranking and selection system. In ACM Multimedia'10, pages 211--220, NY, USA, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J. Yu, Z.-J. Zha, M. Wang, and T.-S. Chua. Aspect ranking : Identifying important product aspects from online consumer reviews. Computational Linguistics, pages 1496--1505, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Z. J. Zha, L. Yang, T. Mei, M. Wang, Z. Wang, T. S. Chua, and X. S. Hua. Visual query suggestion: Towards capturing user intent in internet image search. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl., 6, Aug. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Leveraging user comments for aesthetic aware image search reranking

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WWW '12: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web
        April 2012
        1078 pages
        ISBN:9781450312295
        DOI:10.1145/2187836

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 April 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader