skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2207756acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Impression formation in corporate people tagging

Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

This research explores the relationship between self-presentation and perception by others as manifested explicitly through the use of tags in a people tagging system. The study provides insights relevant for the organizational context since it is based on a system implemented within IBM. We developed a detailed codebook and used it to categorize 9,506 tags assigned to a sample of taggers. Our analysis examines the use of self tags versus social tags (assigned by others) across different categories and sub-categories. While overlap exists, self tags tend to be more factual describing technology expertise, social tags augment the individual tags by adding a personal dimension.

References

  1. Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B. and Gosling, S. D. Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21, 3 (2010), 372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. DiMicco, J., Millen, D. R., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B. and Muller, M. Motivations for social networking at work. In Anonymous Proceedings of the 21st ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, , 2008, 711--720. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dominick, J. R. Who Do You Think You Are? Personal Home Pages and Self-Presentation on the World Wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 4 (1999), 646--658.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ehrlich, K. and Cash, D. Turning information into knowledge: Information finding as a collaborative activity. In Anonymous Proceedings of Digital Libraries. (1994), 119125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellison, N., Heino, R. and Gibbs, J. Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 2 ( 2006), 415--441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Farrell, S., Lau, T., Nusser, S., Wilcox, E. and Muller, M. Socially augmenting employee profiles with people-tagging. In Anonymous Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. (2007), 91--100. ACM New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B. and Heino, R. D. SelfPresentation in Online Personals: The Role of Anticipated Future Interaction, Self-Disclosure, and Perceived Success in Internet Dating. Communication Research, 33, 2 (2006), 152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Goffman, E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Allen Lane, , 1959.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Joinson, A. N. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 2 (2001), 177--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kaid, L. L. and Wadsworth, A. J. Content analysis. Measurement of communication behavior, (1989), 197--217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kenny, D. A. Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. The Guilford Press, , 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C. and Brown, J. Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behaviour & information technology, 25, 2 (2006), 115--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Marcus, B., Machilek, F. and Schütz, A. Personality in cyberspace: Personal web sites as media for personality expressions and impressions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 90, 6 (2006), 1014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Muller, M. J., Ehrlich, K. and Farrell, S. Social tagging and self-tagging for impression management. TR 06-02. IBM Research technical report, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Papacharissi, Z. and Rubin, A. M. Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 2 (2000), 175--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Raban, D. R., Ronen, I. and Guy, I. Acting or Reacting? Preferential Attachment in a People Tagging System. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 62, 4 (2011), 738--747. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Raban, D. R. Self-Presentation and the Value of Information in Q& A Web Sites. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 12 ( 2009), 2465--2473. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Rafaeli, S., Raban, D. R. and Kalman, Y. Social Cognition Online. In Amichai-Hamburger, Y. ed. The social net: The social psychology of the internet. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Rouse, S. V. and Haas, H. A. Exploring the accuracies and inaccuracies of personality perception following Internet-mediated communication. Journal of research in personality, 37, 5 (2003), 446--467.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Savicki, V., Kelley, M. and Oesterreich, E. Judgments of gender in computer-mediated communication. Comput. Hum. Behav., 15, 2 ( 1999), 185--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Schau, H. J. and Gilly, M. C. We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space. Journal of Consumer Research, (2003), 385--404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Singletary, M. W. Mass communication research: Contemporary methods and applications. Longman White Plains, NY, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Trammell, K. D. and Keshelashvili, A. Examining the new influencers: A self-presentation study of A-list blogs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 4 (2005), 968--982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Turkle, S. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. Simon & Schuster, New York, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Vazire, S. Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 98, 2 (2010), 281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Walther, J. B. Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction. Communication Research, 23, 1 (1996), 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Whitty, M. T. Revealing the {} real'me, searching for the {} actual'you: Presentations of self on an internet dating site. Comput. Hum. Behav., 24, 4 (2008), 1707--1723. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Impression formation in corporate people tagging

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2012
      3276 pages
      ISBN:9781450310154
      DOI:10.1145/2207676

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader