skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2208418acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Talking about implications for design in pattern language

Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present our approach to capture and share knowledge from field studies using pattern language and thereby inform the design of ubiquitous computing. In our case, we studied frontline firefighting by observing the existing practice, by developing empathy through participation and by introducing new technology as triggering artifacts. Applying grounded theory, we distilled our findings into pattern language describing core aspects of this practice and their interaction. In a workshop, we introduced the pattern language to developers who had no previous knowledge of this practice and, in follow-up interviews, confronted them with new technology proposals for firefighters. Our study shows that pattern language, while not to be confused with an immutable description of the status quo or a direct path from contextual analysis to design, supports a reflective discussion of novel technology and the fit with and potential impact on existing practice.

References

  1. Alexander, C. The Origins of Pattern Theory: The Future of the Theory, and the Generation of a Living World. IEEE Softw., 16 (5), (1999), 71--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alexander, C. The timeless way of building. Oxford University Press (1979), New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S. and Silverstein, M. A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press (1977), New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Baskerville, R. and Pries-Heje, J. Grounded action research: a method for understanding IT in practice. Accounting, Management and IT 9, 1 (1999), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Borchers, J.O. A pattern approach to interaction design. Wiley (2001), Chichester, England; New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. BRIDGE Project. (2012) http://bridgeproject.euGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cannon, K. and Rajan, A. Frontline Gloves, (2009). www.multiblah.com/portfolio/frontline_gloves.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chi, E.H., Czerwinski, M., Millen, D., Randall, D., Stevens, G., Wulf, V. and Zimmermann, J. Transferability of research findings: context-dependent or model-driven. Proc. CHI'11, ACM (2001), 651--654. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T. and Rodden, T. Patternbased support for interactive design in domestic settings. In Proc. DIS'02, ACM (2002), 265--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Denef, S., (2011) http://patterns.fit.fraunhofer.deGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Denef, S. A Pattern Language of Firefighting Frontline Practice to Inform the Design of Ubiquitous Computing. Shaker (2011), Aachen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Denef, S., Keyson, D.V. and Oppermann, R. Rigid Structures, Independent Units, Monitoring: Organizing Patterns of Frontline Firefighting to Inform the Design of Ubiquitous Computing. In Proc. CHI'11, ACM (2011), 1949--1958. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Denef, S., Oppermann, R. and Keyson, D.V. Designing for Social Configurations: Pattern Languages to Inform the Design of Ubiquitous Computing. International Journal of Design, 5 (3). (2011). 49--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Denef, S., Ramirez, L. and Dyrks, T. Letting Tools Talk: Interactive Technology for Firefighting. Ext. Abstr. CHI'09, ACM Press (2009), 444 - 447. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Denef, S., Ramirez, L., Dyrks, T. and Stevens, G. Handy navigation in ever-changings Spaces: an ethnographic study of firefighting practices. In Proc. DIS'08, ACM Press (2008), 184--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Discovery Channel and Wired Magazine. Intelligent Fire Information and Rescue Equipment (FIRE), (2006). http://fire.me.berkeley.edu/wired.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Dourish, P., Implications for design. In Proc. CHI'06, ACM Press (2006), 541--550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Dourish, P. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. The MIT Press (2001). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Dyrks, T., Ramirez, L. and Denef, S. Designing for Firefighters-Building Empathy through Live Action Role-Playing. Abstracts of ISCRAM'09, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Erickson, T. Lingua Francas for design: sacred places and pattern languages. DIS'00, ACM (2000), 357--368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Erickson, T. Towards a Pattern Language for Interaction Design. In Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing Systems Design, Cambridge University Press (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R. and Vlissides, J. Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software. Addison-wesley Reading, MA, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Law, A., Pennington, S., Bowers, J., Beaver, J., Humble, J., Kerridge, T., Villar, N. and Wilkie, A. Threshold devices: looking out from the home. Proc. CHI'08, ACM (2008), 1429--1438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine Transaction (1967).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Harper, R., Rodden, T., Rogers, Y. and Sellen, A. (eds.). Being Human: Human-Computer Interaction in the year 2020. Microsoft Research (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Harrison, S., Tatar, D. and Sengers, P., The Three Paradigms of HCI. in alt.chi'07, ACM (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Hester, R.T. Sacred Structures and Everyday Life: A Return to Manteo, NC. in Seamon, D. ed. Dwelling, Seeing, and Designing: Toward A Phenomenological Ecology, State University of New York Press (1993)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Judge, T.K., Neustaedter, C., Tang, A. and Harrison, S. Bridging the gap: moving from contextual analysis to design. Ext. Abstr. CHI'10, ACM (2010), 4497--4500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. McCullough, M. Digital ground: Architecture, pervasive computing, and environmental knowing. MIT Press, (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Naghsh, A.M. and Roast, C.R. Designing user interaction with robots swarms in emergency settings. Proc. NordiCHI'08, ACM Press (2008), 519 - 522. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Ramirez, L., Denef, S. and Dyrks, T. Towards HumanCentered Support for Indoor Navigation. Proc. CHI '09, ACM (2009), 1279--1282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. RUNES Project. Road tunnel fire (2006), http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RU21YO6XF_oGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Suchman, L. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge Univ. Press (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Tidwell, J. Interaction Design Pattern. (1999) http://www.mit.edu/~jtidwell/common_ground.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Toups, Z.O., Kerne, A., Hamilton, W.A. and Shahzad, N. Zero-fidelity simulation of fire emergency response: improving team coordination learning. Proc. CHI '11, ACM (2011), 1959--1968. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Weick, K. and Roberts, K. Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks. Admin. Science Quarterly, 38 (3). (1993) 357--381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. and Evenson, S. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. Proc. CHI'07, ACM (2007) 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Talking about implications for design in pattern language

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2012
      3276 pages
      ISBN:9781450310154
      DOI:10.1145/2207676

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader