skip to main content
10.1145/2212776.2223739acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

In search of theoretical foundations for UX research and practice

Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we point out the relevance of and the need for a theoretical discussion around UX research and practice. Although there is a good coverage of methodological and design related topics in the HCI literature, there is still a lack of theoretical focus in the rapidly increasing work on user experience (UX). We analyzed 122 individual items on theories collected in a CHI'11 special interest group session on UX theories and theoretical frameworks. The data set was filtered and categorized in several iterations, resulting in 56 items distributed over 7 major theory categories and related to 9 relevant disciplines. The categories are an initial mapping of the field and point towards the directions for further conceptual and theoretical clarification. Our results help to explore the multi-disciplinary nature of UX and to build a more solid foundation for UX research and practice.

References

  1. Bassoli, A., Brewer, J. and Martin, K. 2007. In-between theory and practice: dialogues in design research. In CHI EA '07. ACM, NY, USA, 1691--1696. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Baumer, E. P. S. and Tomlinson, B. 2011. Comparing activity theory with distributed cognition for video analysis: beyond "kicking the tires". In Proc. CHI '11. ACM, NY, USA, 133--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Blythe, M., Wright, P., McCarthy, J. and Bertelsen, O.W. 2006. Theory and method for experience centered design. In Proc. CHI EA '06. ACM, NY, USA, 1691--1694. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Carroll, J. M. (Ed.) 2003. HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks. Towards a Multidisciplinary Science. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Diefenbach, S and Hassenzahl, M. 2009. The "Beauty Dilemma": beauty is valued but discounted in product choice. In Proc. CHI '09. ACM, NY, USA, 1419--1426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Fuchs, C. and Obrist, M. 2010. HCI and society: Towards a typology of universal design principles. In: International Journal of HCI, 638--656.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaver, W. 2006. Learning from Experience: The Humble Role of Theory in Practice-Based Research. CHI'06 Workshop position paper for Theory and method for experience centered design.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kuutti, K. 2010. Where are the Ionians of user experience research? In Proc. NordiCHI '10. ACM, NY, USA, 715--718. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Law, E. L. C., van Schaik, P. 2010. Modelling user experience - An agenda for research and practice. Interacting with Computers 22(5): 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Obrist, M.; Law, E. L.-C.; Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K.; Roto, V.; Vermeeren, A. & Kuutti, K. UX Research: What Theoretical Roots Do We Build On - If Any? In Proc. CHI EA '11. ACM, NY, USA, 165--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Obrist, M., Roto, V., Law, E. L-C., Väänänen-VainioMattila, K., Vermeeren, A. P. O. S., Buie, E. 2012. Theories behind UX Research and How They Are Used in Practice. Accepted CHI'12 Workshop. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Shneiderman, B., Card, S., Norman, D. A., Tremaine, M. and Waldrop, M. M. 2002. CHI@20: fighting our way from marginality to power. In CHI EA '02. ACM, NY, USA, 688--691. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Rogers, Y. 2011. Interaction design gone wild: striving for wild theory. interactions 18, 4(7/11), 58--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Vermeeren, A. P. O. S., Law, E. L. C., Roto, V., Obrist, M., Hoonhout, J. and Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. 2010. UX evaluation methods: current state and development needs. In Proc. NordiCHI '10. ACM, NY, USA, 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Wright, P., and McCarthy J. 2010. Experience-Centered Design: Designers, Users, and Communities in Dialogue. Synthesis Lectures in Human-Centered Informatics, ed. John Carroll, no. 8, San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., and Koskinen, I. 2009. Building a unified framework for the practice of experience design. In Proc. CHI '09. ACM, NY, USA, 4803--4806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. In search of theoretical foundations for UX research and practice

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader