skip to main content
10.1145/2245276.2245456acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards effective group recommendations for microblogging users

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 March 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we propose a group recommendation model that infers the group preferences based on the actions of its members. Such recommendations can be useful when individuals are working together in areas that require relevant up-to-date news information to support decisions. To test our model, we used Twitter, a microblogging service, as a platform to recommend links to news articles. To evaluate our model, we compared the group satisfaction with different strategies of group recommendation. Results show that our model obtained an average group rating of 3.58 out of 5 over the recommendations given to the group. This represents an improvement of approximately 25% over the best performing strategy we tested. We also analyzed the impact of different actions on Twitter and of a time decay parameter on group satisfaction

References

  1. L. Baltrunas, T. Makcinskas, and F. Ricci. Group recommendations with rank aggregation and collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems - RecSys '10, page 119, Barcelona, Spain, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. Boratto and S. Carta. State-of-the-art in group recommendation and new approaches for automatic identification of groups. In A. Soro, E. Vargiu, G. Armano, and G. Paddeu, editors, Information Retrieval and Mining in Distributed Environments, volume 324 of Studies in Computational Intelligence, pages 1--20. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Crossen, J. Budzik, and K. J. Hammond. Flytrap: intelligent group music recommendation. In IUI '02: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 184--185, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Dolog, B. Simon, W. Nejdl, and T. Klobučar. Personalizing access to learning networks. ACM Trans. Internet Technol., 8(2): 1--21, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Jameson. More than the sum of its members: challenges for group recommender systems. In AVI '04: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, pages 48--54, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H. Lieberman, N. W. Van Dyke, and A. S. Vivacqua. Let's browse: a collaborative web browsing agent. In IUI '99: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 65--68, New York, NY, USA, 1999. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Masthoff. Group modeling: Selecting a sequence of television items to suit a group of viewers. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 14(1): 37--85, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Masthoff and A. Gatt. In pursuit of satisfaction and the prevention of embarrassment: affective state in group recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 16(3--4): 281--319, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. F. McCarthy and T. D. Anagnost. Musicfx: an arbiter of group preferences for computer supported collaborative workouts. In CSCW '98: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 363--372, New York, NY, USA, 1998. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. F. McCarthy, T. J. Costa, and E. S. Liongosari. Unicast, outcast & groupcast: Three steps toward ubiquitous, peripheral displays. In UbiComp '01: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pages 332--345, London, UK, 2001. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. O'Connor, D. Cosley, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Polylens: a recommender system for groups of users. In ECSCW'01: Proceedings of the seventh conference on European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 199--218, Norwell, MA, USA, 2001. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Pizzutilo, B. De Carolis, G. Cozzolongo, and F. Ambruoso. Group modeling in a public space: methods, techniques, experiences. In AIC'05: Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Informatics and Communications, pages 175--180, Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA, 2005. World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. C. Senot, D. Kostadinov, M. Bouzid, J. Picault, A. Aghasaryan, and C. Bernier. Analysis of strategies for building group profiles. In P. De Bra, A. Kobsa, and D. Chin, editors, User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, volume 6075 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 40--51. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. B. Smyth, E. Balfe, J. Freyne, P. Briggs, M. Coyle, and O. Boydell. Exploiting query repetition and regularity in an adaptive community-based web search engine. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 14(5): 383--423, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SAC '12: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
    March 2012
    2179 pages
    ISBN:9781450308571
    DOI:10.1145/2245276
    • Conference Chairs:
    • Sascha Ossowski,
    • Paola Lecca

    Copyright © 2012 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 26 March 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    SAC '12 Paper Acceptance Rate270of1,056submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader