skip to main content
10.1145/2254556.2254658acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaviConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Investigative analysis across documents and drawings: visual analytics for archaeologists

Published:21 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the invention and rapid improvement of data-capturing devices, such as satellite imagery and digital cameras, the information that archaeologists must manage in their everyday's activities has rapidly grown in complexity and amount. In this work we present Indiana Finder, an interactive visualization system that supports archaeologists in the examination of large repositories of documents and drawings. In particular, the system provides visual analytic support for investigative analysis such as the interpretation of new archaeological findings, the detection of interpretation anomalies, and the discovery of new insights. We illustrate the potential of Indiana Finder in the context of the digital protection and conservation of rock art natural and cultural heritage sites. In this domain, Indiana Finder provides an integrated environment that archaeologists can exploit to investigate, discover, and learn from textual documents, pictures, and drawings related to rock carvings. This goal is accomplished through novel visualization methods including visual similarity ring charts that may help archaeologists in the hard task of dating a symbol in a rock engraving based on its shape and on the surrounding symbols.

References

  1. Ancona, M., Mascardi, V., Quercini, G., Bogdanovych, A., de Lumley, H., Papaleo, L., Simoff, S., Traverso, A. Virtual institutions for preserving and simulating the culture of Mount Bego's ancient people. In Proc. of the 11th VAST International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. Eurographics Association, 2010, 5--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Archaeological Data Service: http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barceló, J. A., Forte, M., Sanders, D. Virtual Reality in Archaeology. Oxford: BAR International Series 843, 2000, Archaeopress.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bednarik, R. Rock Art Science: The Scientific Study of Palaeoart. IFRAO-Brepols, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bianchi, N. Mount Bego: prehistoric rock carvings. Adoranten, Scandinavian Society for Prehistoric Art, 2010, 70--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bicknell, C. M. A Guide to the Prehistoric Rock Engravings in the Italian Maritime Alps. Tip. G. Bessone, 1913.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Casella, G., Deufemia, V., Mascardi, V., Costagliola, G., and Martelli, M. An agent-based framework for sketched symbol interpretation. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 19, 2 (2008), 225--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chang, R., Ghoniem, M., Kosara, R., Ribarsky, W., Yang, J., Suma, E., Ziemkiewicz, C., Kern, D., Sudjianto, A. WireVis: Visualization of categorical, time-varying data from financial transactions. In Proc. of Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST 2007). IEEE Press, 2007, 155--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Chen, H., Zeng, D., Atabaksh, H., Wyzga, W., Schroder, J. Coplink: managing law enforcement data and knowledge. Communications of the ACM, 46, 1 (2003), 28--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Chippindale, C. Clarence Bicknell: Archaeology and Science in the 19th Century. Antiquity, 58, 224 (1984), 185--193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chippindale, C., and Taçon, P. S. C. The archaeology of rock-art. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. David, B., and Wilson, M. Inscribed Landscapes. University of Hawaii Press, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dean, J., Gumerman, G., Epstein, J., Axtell, R., Swedlund, A., Parker, M., McCarroll, S. Understanding Anasazi culture change through agent-based modeling. In Kohler, T. A., and Gumerman, G. J. eds. Agent-based Modeling of Long-term Human Adaptive Systems. Oxford University Press, 179--205. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. de Lumley, H., Echassoux, A. The Rock Carvings of the Chalcolithic and Ancient Bronze Age from the Mont Bego Area. The Cosmogonic Myths of the Early Metallurgic Settlers in the Southern Alps. L'Anthropologie, 113, 5P2 (2009), 969--1004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Earl, G. P., Wheatley, D. W. Virtual Reconstruction and the Interpretative Process: A Case-study from Avebury. In D. W. Wheatley, G. P. Earl, & S. Poppy (Eds.): Contemporary themes in archaeological computing. Oxford: Oxbow, 2002, 5--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Forlines, C. Wittenburg, K. Wakame: Sense Making of Multi-Dimensional Spatial-Temporal Data. In Proceedings of Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI 2010), (Rome, Italy, May 25--29, 2010). ACM Press, New York, NY, 2010, 33--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hägerstrand, T. What about people in regional science? Papers in Regional Science, 24, 1 (1970), 7--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Happa, J., Artusi, A., Dubla, P., Bashfordrogers, T., Debattista, K., Hulusic, V., Chalmers, A. The Virtual Reconstruction and Daylight Illumination of the Panagia Angeloktisti. In Proc. of the 10th VAST International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, Eurographics Association, 2009, pp. 49--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Havre, S,. Hetzler, E., Whitney, P., and Nowell, L. Themeriver: Visualizing thematic changes in large document collections. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 8, 1 (2002), 9--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Helskog, K. Theoretical Perspectives in Rock Art Research. Novus Forlag, Oslo, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Huisman, O., Feliciano Santiago, I., Kraak, M.-J., and Retsios, B. Developing a geovisual analytics environment for investigating archaeological events: Extending the space-time cube. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 36, 3 (2009), 225--236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Jonker, D., Wright, W., Schroh, D., Proulx, P., and Cort, B. Information triage with TRIST. In Proc. of International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, (McLean, VA), 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Klein, G., Moon, B., and Hoffman, R. Making sense of sensemaking 1: alternative perspectives. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21, 4 (July/Aug. 2006), 70--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kohler, T. A., J. Kresl, C. V. West, E. Carr, and R. H. Wilshusen. Be there then: A modeling approach to settlement determinants and spatial efficiency among late ancestral pueblo populations of the Mesa Verde region, U. S. Southwest. In Kohler, T. A., and Gumerman, G. J., eds. Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies. Oxford University Press, 2000, 145--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Llobera, M. Archaeological Visualization: Towards an Archaeological Information Science (AISc). Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 18, 3 (2011), 193--223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Marchionini, G. Exploratory search: From finding to understanding. Communications of the ACM, 49, 4 (Apr. 2006), 41--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Marchionini, G., and White, R. W. Information-seeking support systems. IEEE Computer, 42, 3 (Mar. 2009), 30--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. McManamon, F. P., and Kintigh, K. W. Digital antiquity: Transforming archaeological data into knowledge. SAA Archaeological Record, 10, 2 (2010), 37--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Morwood, M. J., and Smith, C. E. Contemporary Approaches to World Rock Art. 1996. Available from: http://www.une.edu.au/archaeology/WorldRockArt/. Last accessed: December, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Open Context: http://opencontext.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Richards, J. D. Archaeology, e-publication and the Semantic Web. Antiquity, 80, 310 (2006), 970--979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Sedlmair M., Isenberg, P., Baur, D., Mauerer, M., Pigorsch, C, Butz, A. Cardiogram: Visual Analytics for Automotive Engineers. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2011), (Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 7--12, 2011). ACM Press, New York, NY, 2011, 1727--1736. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Snow, D. R., Gahegan, M., Giles, C. L., Hirth, K. G., Milner, G. R., Mitra, P., et al. Enhanced: Cybertools and archaeology. Science, 311, 5763 (2006), 958--959.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Stasko, J., Görg, C., Liu, Z. Jigsaw: supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization. Information Visualization, 7, 2 (2008), 118--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Tekušovà, T., Darmstadt, G., and Schreck, T. Visualizing Time-Dependent Data in Multivariate Hierarchic Plots-Design and Evaluation of an Economic Application. In Proc. Information Visualization (IV'08). IEEE CS Press, 2008, 143--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Thomas, J. and Cook, K. Illuminating the Path: Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. National Visualization and Analytics Center, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. van Leusen, P. GIS and archaeological resource management: a European agenda. In Lock G. Stancic, Z. (eds): Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems. A European perspective. London, Taylor and Francis, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. White, R. W., Kules, B., Drucker, S. M., and Schraefel, M. C. Supporting exploratory search. Communications of the ACM, 49, 4 (Apr. 2006), 36--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Whitley, D. S. Handbook of Rock Art Research. AltaMira Press, Beverly Hills (CA), 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams, M. Archaeology and GIS: Prehistoric Habitat Reconstruction. In Proceedings of ESRI User Conference, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Winterbottom, S. J., and Long, D. From Abstract Digital Models to Rich Virtual Environments: Landscape Contexts in Kilmartin Glen, Scotland. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, (2006), 1356--1367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Wise, J. A., Thomas, J. J., Pennock, K., Lantrip, D., Pottier, M., Schur, A., Crow, V. Visualizing the non-visual: spatial analysis and interaction with information from text documents. In Proc. of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis'95), (Atlanta, GA, USA). IEEE CS Press, 1995, 51--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Investigative analysis across documents and drawings: visual analytics for archaeologists

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        AVI '12: Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces
        May 2012
        846 pages
        ISBN:9781450312875
        DOI:10.1145/2254556

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 May 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate107of408submissions,26%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader