skip to main content
10.1145/2287056.2287066acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Performance evaluation of video-on-demand in virtualized environments: the client perspective

Published:18 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Virtualization is a key technology for data centres to implement infrastructure as a service as well as to achieve server consolidation and application colocation. Over the years performance of virtual machine (VM) monitors have improved [8]. Thus, new services are being migrated to these environments. Latency sensitive applications however, are not considered fit for Virtual environments due to high virtualization overhead and potential interference from other VMs. In this paper, we performed measurement-based analysis of the performance impact on VOD server in presence of I/O bound workloads in co-located virtual machines. The focus of our study is on the QOS (quality of service) received by clients; metrics of delay, jitter, packet loss are examined. As expected, the performance of VOD server in a VM suffers severe degradation in presence of heavy disk-I/O bound and outbound network UDP co-located workloads.

References

  1. S. Appel and I. Petrov. Performance Evaluation of Multi Machine Virtual Environments. In 2010 SPEC Benchmark Workshop, pages 1--13, Paderborn, Germany, Oct. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. K. Barker and P. Shenoy. Empirical Evaluation of Latency-Sensitive Application Performance in the Cloud. In MMSYS 2010, pages 35--46, Phoenix, AZ, February 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Chinni and R. Hiremane. Virtual Machine Device Queues. Intel Corp White Paper, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. W. Huang, J. Liu, B. Abali, and D. Panda. A Case for High Performance Computing with Virtual Machines. In International Conference on Supercomputing, pages 125--134, Queensland, Australia, June 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Iosup, S. Ostermann, N. Yigitbasi, R. Prodan, T. Fahringer, and D. Epema. Performance Analysis of Cloud Computing Services for Many-tasks Scientific Computing. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 22(6):931--945, June 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Kivity, Y. Kamay, D. Laor, U. Lublin, and A. Liguori. KVM: The linux Virtual Machine Monitor. In Linux Symposium, pages 225--230, Ottawa, ON, Canada, June 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Liu. Evaluating Standard-based Self-virtualizing Devices: A Performance Study on 10 GbE NICs with SR-IOV Support. In IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, pages 1--12, Atlanta, GA, April 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. McDougall and J. Anderson. Virtualization Performance: Perspectives And Challenges Ahead. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev, 44(4):40--56, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. V. Nae, A. Iosup, R. Prodan, and T. Fahringer. The Impact of Virtualization on the Pperformance of Massively Multiplayer Online Games. In NetGames, pages 1--6, Paris, France, November 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P. Padala, X. Zhu, Z. Wang, S. Singhal, and K. Shin. Performance Evaluation of Virtualization Technologies for Server Consolidation. Technical Report HPL-2007-59, HP Labs, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Russell. Virtio: Towards a De-facto Standard for Virtual I/O Devices. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev, 42(5):95--103, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. H. Schulzrinne, S. Casner, R. Frederick, and V. Jacobson. RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications. RFC 3550 (Standard), July 2003. Updated by RFCs 5506, 5761, 6051, 6222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. F. Boronat Segu;ı, G. Cebollada, J. Carlos, and J. Lloret Mauri. An RTP/RTCP based approach for multimedia group and inter-stream synchronization. Multimedia Tools Appl., 40(2):285--319, Nov. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Shafer. I/O Virtualization Bottlenecks in Cloud Computing Today. In USENIX WIOV Workshop, pages 1--7, Pittsburgh, PA, March 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. B. Tarnai and M. Telekom. Requirements and Traffic Dimensioning for System Concepts and Architecture. Technical report, OASE/ACCORDANCE, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. G.I. Wang and T. S. Ng. The Impact of Virtualization on Network Performance of Amazon EC2 Data Center. In IEEE INFOCOM, pages 1163--1171, San Diego, CA, March 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Performance evaluation of video-on-demand in virtualized environments: the client perspective

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          VTDC '12: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on Virtualization Technologies in Distributed Computing Date
          June 2012
          68 pages
          ISBN:9781450313445
          DOI:10.1145/2287056

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 18 June 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate5of10submissions,50%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader