skip to main content
10.1145/2307729.2307736acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

(Hyper) local news aggregation: designing for social affordances

Published:04 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Being able to debate, reflect, form opinions, consider counter evidence and make informed decisions is a foundation of civic life in democratic societies. Government benefits from broad participation in collective decision making in terms of sustainable outcomes (e.g., greater consensus) and quality of life in our cities and communities. These collective decision making capabilities are undermined by a strange combination of diminishing (or extinct) local print media, especially local newspapers, and by its obverse, a plethora of information and communication opportunities that are scattered across numerous disparate and decentralized websites and resources (e.g., webpages, RSS feeds, social network software, email, listservs, podcasts, tweets). To address this problem, a number of news aggregators have emerged that capture local content from dispersed sites. To facilitate civic engagement, these sites also need to support social interaction and information exchange. In this paper we review the state of the art in local news aggregation in the US and their support for social affordances (social trust, networks and interaction) that are essential to civic participation. We present a prototype we have developed for local news aggregation that supports social affordances. We summarize briefly the design strategies and techniques (e.g., algorithms) we used to cluster topics and user generated content derived from existing local sources. The prototype should lead to a replicable model for other US communities.

References

  1. Shane, P. M., 2004. Democracy Online: The prospects for political renewal through the Internet, Routledge, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Chadwick, A. 2006. Internet Politics: States, citizens, and new communication technologies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Coleman, S. and Blumler, J. G. 2009. The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kavanaugh, A., et al., 2008. Net gains in political participation: secondary effects of Internet on community. Information, Communication, and Society, 11(7), 933--963.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Kohut, A., et al. 2010. Americans Spending More Time Following the News, The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Rosensteil, T., et al. 2011. How People Learn about their Local Community, Pew Research Center, Project for Ecellence in Journalism, Pew Internet & American Life Project and Knight Foundation, Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Peer, L., et al. 2007. The Local TV News Experience: How to win viewers by focusing on engagement, Northwestern University Media Management Center, Evanston, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gibson, J. J. 2007. The Tteory of affordances. In Perceiving, Acting and Knowing, R. E. Shaw, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Norman, D., 1990. The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hartson, R., 2003. Cognitive, physical, sensory and functional affordances in interaction design. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(5), 315--338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Howarth, J., et al. 2007. Designing a conference for women entering academe in the sciences and engineering. Advancing Women in Leadership Online Journal, 23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ahuja, S. 2009. A Tale of Two Sites: An explorative study of the design and evaluation of social network sites. Masters Thesis. Virginia Tech.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanrahan, B., Pérez-Quiñones, M. and Kavanaugh. 2011. Evaluating software for communities using social affordances. In Procedings of ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 7--12, 2011) CHI 2011. ACM, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Wellman, B., et al., 2003. The social affordances of the Internet for networked individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ali-Hasan, N. and Adamic, L. 2007. Expressing social relationships on the blog through links and comments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (Boulder, CO, March 26--28, 2007) ICWSM 2007. AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Patch. Patch Crunchbase Profile. {cited 2011 July}; Crunchbase, The Free Tech Company Database}. Available from: http://www.patch.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Patch. {cited 2011 August}; Available from: http://www.patch.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kopytoff, V. G. 2011. AOL bets on hyperlocal news, finding progress where many have failed. New York Times; Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/17/business/media/17local.html?pagewanted=all.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Everyblock. EveryBlock CrunchBase Profile. {cited 2011 July}; CrunchBase, The Free Tech Company Database}. Available from: http://www.crunchbase.com/company/everyblock.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. News360. Available from: http://www.news360.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Google. About Google News. {cited 2011 July}; Available from: http://www.google.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. iBrattleboro. Brattleboro, Vermont Citizen News. {cited 2011 July}; Available from: http://www.ibrattleboro.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. RVANews. About RVANews - Richmond News, Local Sports, Entertainment & Richmond Virginia Events. {cited 2011 July}; Available from: http://rvanews.com/about.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Cohill, A. and A. Kavanaugh, eds. 1997. Community Networks: Lessons from Blacksburg, Virginia. Artech House, Norwood, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Blacksburg Electronic Village (BEV). Available from: http://www.bev.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kavanaugh, A., 2011. Community in the information age: The Blacksburg Electronic Village in perspective (1993-2010). In Leadership in Science and Technology: A Reference Handbook, W. Bainbridge, Ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 593--601.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Topix. About Topix: Your Town. Your News. Your Take.; Available from: http://www.topix.com/topix/about.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Fwix. Fwix-Geotagging the Entire Web. {cited 2011 July}; Available from: http://fwix.com/about.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Linden, G., Smith, B. and York, J. 2003. Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative Filtering. IEEE Internet Computing, 7(1), 76--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Virginia Tech Students daily newspaper. Available from: http://www.collegiatetimes.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Leskovec, J., et al. 2009. Community structure in large networks: Natural cluster sizes and the absence of large well-defined clusters. Internet Mathematics, 6(1), 29--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Leskovec, J., Huttenlocher, D. P. and Kleinberg, J. M. 2009. Signed networks in social media. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, April 4--9, 2009), CHI 2009. ACM, New York, NY, 1361--1370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Papagelis, M., Bansal, N. and Koudas, N. 2009. Information cascades in the blogosphere: A look behind the curtain. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (San Jose, CA: May 17--20, 2009). ICWSM 2009. AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Leskovec, J., Kleinberg, J. M. and Faloutsos, C. 2007. Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters. In ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 1(1). KDD 2007. ACM, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Gruhl, D., et al. 2004. Information diffusion through blogspace. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web (New York, NY, May 17--22, 2004). WWW 2004. ACM, New York, NY, 491--501. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. LaRose, M. and Eastin, R. 2004. A social cognitive theory of internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 48(3), 358--377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Shao, G. 2009. Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: A uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research, 19(1), 7--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Pang, B. and Lee, L. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1--2), 1--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Godara, J., Kavanaugh, A. and P. Isenhour, P. 2009. The efficacy of knowledge sharing in centralized and self-organizing online communities: Weblog networks vs. discussion forums. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Kona, Hawaii, January 7--10, 2009). HICSS 2009. IEEE Computer Society Press, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Tauro, C., et al. 2008. Deliberation in the wild: A visualization tool for blog discovery and citizen-to-citizen participation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Government Research (Montreal, Canada, May 18--21, 2008). dg.o 2008. ACM, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Ahuja, S., Pérez-Quiñones, M. and A. Kavanaugh, A. 2009. Rethinking local conversations on the Web. In Online Deliberation: Design, Research and Practice, T. Davies and S. P. Gangadharan, Eds. CSLI Publications, Palo Alto, CA, 123--129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Java, A., et al. 2007. Why we Twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data MIning and 1st Social Network Analysis and Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining Workshop (San Jose, CA, August 12--15, 2007). KDD 2007 and SNA-KDD 2007. ACM, New York, NY, 118--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Ahuja, S. 2009. A Tale of Two Sites: An explorative study of the design and evaluation of social network sites. Masters Thesis, Virginia Tech.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Lewis, C., et al. 1990. Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, Washington, April 1--5, 1990), CHI 1990. ACM, New York, NY, 235--242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Blackmon, M. H., et al. 2002. Cognitive walkthrough for the web. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Minneapolis, MN, April 20--25, 2002). CHI 2002. ACM, New York, NY, 463--470. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. (Hyper) local news aggregation: designing for social affordances

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      dg.o '12: Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
      June 2012
      324 pages
      ISBN:9781450314039
      DOI:10.1145/2307729

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader