skip to main content
10.1145/2317956.2318001acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation

Published:11 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Constructive design research is a form of research where design activity is a central research activity. One type of constructive design research is critical design, which seeks to disrupt or transgress social and cultural norms. Critical design's advocates have turned to critical theory as an intellectual resource to support their approach. Interestingly, critical design processes remain under-articulated in the growing design research literature. In this paper, we first explain why critical design is so hard to describe as a design practice or process. We then describe two critical design case studies we undertook and the effects we observed them having when place in the field. After sharing our breakdowns and breakthroughs along the way, we offer reflections on designing for provocativeness, the value of deep relationships between researchers and research participants, and the need to plan for and go with a fluid and emergent research plan --- with the goal of helping clarify critical design as an approach.

References

  1. Bardzell, J. Interaction criticism: An introduction to the practice. Interacting with Computers 23 (6), 2011, 604--621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bardzell, S. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. Proc. of CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1301--1310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bardzell, S., & Bardzell, J. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI. Proc. of CHI'2011, ACM Press (2011), 675--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bardzell, S. & Churchill, E., eds. Special Issue: Feminism and HCI: New Perspectives. Interacting With Computers 23 (5), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bell, G., Blythe, M., & Sengers, P. Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 12 (2), 2005, 149--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Kammersgaard, J., Kyng, M., & Sundblad, Y. A Utopian experience: In G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, & M. Kyng. (Eds.), Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge. Aldershot, UK: Avebury, 1987, 251--278..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchanan, R. Declaration by design: rhetoric, argument, and demonstration in design practice. In V. Margolin, ed., Design Discourse: History, Theory, Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989, 91--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchenau, M. & Fulton Suri, J. F. Experience prototyping. Proc of DIS. ACM (2000), 424--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Buckley, C. Made in patriarchy: Toward a feminist analysis of women and design. In Margolin, V. (ed). Design Discourse: History, Theory, Criticism, 1989Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cockburn, C., & Ormrod, S. Gender and Technology in the Making. Sage Publications, Ltd., 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowan. R. More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. Basic Books, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cross, N. Designerly Ways of Knowing. Basel: Birkhauser, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Davidoff, S., Lee, M., Dey, A., Zimmerman, J. Rapidly exploring application design through speed dating. In Proc of UbiComp '07, ACM Press (2007) 429--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Dunne, A. (2006). Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Dunne, A., and Raby. F. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Fallman, D. (2007) Why research-oriented design isn't design-oriented research: On the tensions between design and research in an implicit design discipline. J Know Tech Policy 20 (3), Springer Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Forlizzi, J. Zimmerman, J. and Stolterman, E. Design Research: A Step in the maturation of a field. In Proc. of IASDR09 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Frayling, C. Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art Research Papers 1, 1(1993), 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaver, W., Blythe, M., Boucher, A., Jarvis, N., Bowers, J., and Wright, P. The prayer companion: Openness and specificity, materiality and spirituality. In Proc. of CHI'10. ACM Press (2010), 2055--2064. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., and Walker, B. Cultural Probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions XI (5), ACM Press (2004), pp. 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Gaver, W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., Steed, A., Villars, N., Walker, B. The drift table: designing for ludic engagement. Extended Abstracts of CHI, ACM Press (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Gaver, W., Bowers, J., Kerridge, T., Boucher, A. and Jarvis, N. Anatomy of a failure: How we knew when our design went wrong, and what we learned from it. In Proc. of CHI, ACM Press (2009), 2213--2222 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Gaver, W., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. Cultural probes. Interactions, ACM Press (1996), 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Gaver, W., Sengers, P., Kerridge, T., Kaye, J. and Bowers, J. Enhancing ubiquitous computing with user interpretation: Field testing the home health horoscope. In Proc. of CHI, (2007) ACM Press, 537--546. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Gelber, S. Do-It-Yourself: Constructing, repairing, and maintaining domestic masculinity. In Scanlon, S. (ed.). The Gender and Consumer Culture Reader. NYU Press, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Iacucci, G., Kuutti, K. & Ranta M. On the move with a magic thing: role playing in concept design of mobile services and devices. In: Proc of DIS, ACM (2002), 193--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J. and Wensveen, S. Design Research through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Kuutti, K. HCI and design: uncomfortable bedfellows? In Binder, Löwgren & Malmborg (eds.) (Re)searching the Digital Bauhaus. London: Springer, 2009, 43--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Ljungblad, S. and Holmquist, L. E. Transfer Scenarios: Grounding Innovation with Marginal Practices. In Proceedings of CHI, (2007) ACM Press, 737--746. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Nelson H. & Stolterman, E. The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Schell, J. The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses. Morgan Kaufmann, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sengers, P., and Gaver, G. Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In Proc. of DIS'06. ACM Press (2006), 99--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Williams, J. Getting housewives the electric message: Gender and energy marketing in the early 20th century. In R. Horowitz and A. Mohun (eds.). His and Hers: Gender, Consumption, and Technology. University Press of Virginia: Charlottesville, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. and Evenson, S. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proc. of CHI'07 ACM Press (2007), 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E. and Forlizzi, J. An analysis and critique of research through design: Towards a formalization of a research approach. In Proc. of DIS'10. ACM Press (2010), 310--319. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '12: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      June 2012
      828 pages
      ISBN:9781450312103
      DOI:10.1145/2317956

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader