skip to main content
10.1145/2317956.2318086acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The message in the bottle: best practices for transferring the knowledge from qualitative user studies

Published:11 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

This workshop aims to identify and improve current strategies and practices for transferring knowledge from qualitative user studies to become inspiration for an experience-centered design process. The message (e.g., qualitative user study results) can be skewed when passed on from one phase to another in the design and development process. Moreover, the way insights are communicated is often not inspiring enough. We intend to get practitioners and academics engaged in a discussion about how to best transfer research findings of especially qualitative user studies and prevent loss of valuable information. Best practices, failure and success stories are especially welcomed as contributions. At the end of this workshop we will have identified strengths of a few methods, tools, and techniques selected from examples of best practices. Also, we will have summarized limitations and challenges of knowledge transfer and communication practices within experience-centered design.

References

  1. Atasoy, B. and Martens, J. B. STORIFY: a tool to assist design teams in envisioning and discussing user experience. Proc. CHI EA '11. ACM Press (2011), NY, USA, 2263--2268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Czerwinski, M., Benbasat, I., Ratner, J., Santhanam, R. and Todd, P. HCI Research Transfer to Practice: Better Together (2003). Proc. SIGHCI'03. Paper 13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Goodwin, K., Cooper, A. Designing for the Digital Age: How to Create Human-Centered Products and Services. John Wiley & Sons, (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hassenzahl, M. and Tractinsky, N., (2006). User Experience - a research agenda. Behavior & Information Technology, 25, 2 (2006), 91--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Holloway, I. and Todres, L. Thinking differently: challenges in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2 (2007), 12--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Keen, S. and Todres, L. Strategies for Disseminating Qualitative Research Findings: Three Exemplars, Forum: Qual. Social Research, 8(3), (2007), Art. 17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lang, M. Communicating Academic Research Findings to IS Professionals: An Analysis of Problems. Informing Science, 6 (2003), 21--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Law, E. L., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A. P. and Kort, J. Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. Proc. CHI '09. ACM Press (2009), NY, USA, 719--728. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Obrist, M., Beck, E., Wurhofer, D. and Tscheligi, M. Experience characters: a design tool for communicating mobile phone experiences to designers. Proc. MobileHCI '11. ACM Press (2011), NY, USA, 385--394. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Vermeeren, A. P. O. S., Roto, V., Law, E. L-C., Obrist, M., Hoonhout, J. and Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. User experience evaluation methods: current state and development needs. Proc. NordiCHI '10. ACM Press (2010), NY, USA, 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Wright, P., McCarthy, J., and Carroll, J. Experience-Centered Design: Designers, Users, and Communities in Dialogue. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. and Koskinen, I. Building a unified framework for the practice of experience design. Proc. CHI EA '09. ACM Press (2009), NY, USA, 4803--4806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The message in the bottle: best practices for transferring the knowledge from qualitative user studies

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader