skip to main content
10.1145/2347504.2347563acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdppiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Opening "open" innovation

Published:22 June 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

This investigation examines recent literature from management science, social computing and design to develop a framework for understanding the mechanisms that would enable open innovation platforms to more effectively address the most pressing areas of human need reported and reportable by such systems. The many challenges that must be overcome to solve the creative, ethical, and strategic focus problems implicit in existing open innovation systems are described. The paper concludes with specific recommendations for research on such systems, including how highly contextual end-user needs can be satisfied to encourage entrepreneurship and market success. This will only be possible if participants contributing to open innovation systems are enabled to leverage the power of the system for themselves, leading to increasingly open innovation environments.

References

  1. Ackerman, M. S., and Malone, T. W. 1990. Answer Garden: a tool for growing organizational memory," proc. Conference on Office Information Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ackerman, M. S. 1998. Augmenting Organizational Memory: a field study of answer garden. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 16, no. 3 (July 1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Amabile, T. M. 1996. Creativity in Context, Westview Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ancona, D. G., and Caldwell, D. F. 1992. Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 4 (December 1992), pp. 634--665.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Barrow, L. H., 2010. Encouraging Creativity with Scientific Inquiry, Creative Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayus, B. L. 2010. Crowdsourcing and Individual Creativity Over Time: The Detrimental Effects of Past Success. Online at http://public.kenan-flagler.unc.edu/faculty/bayusb/Web Page/Papers/Bayus-Crowdsourcing(8-26-10).pdf, accessed 11/15/2010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Biewald, L. 2010. Massive Multiplayer Human Computation for Fun, Money, and Survival, XRDS (Winter 2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Billman, D., Convertino, G., Shrager, J., Pirolli, P., and Massar, J. 2006. Collaborative intelligence analysis with CACHE and its effects on information gathering and cognitive bias, Human Computer Interaction Consortium Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Börner, K. 2001. Adaptation and Evaluation of 3-Dimensional Collaborative Information Visualizations, User Modeling: Workshop Proc. of EEAS (July 2001), pp. 33--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Boudreau, K. and Lakhani, K. 2009. How to Manage Outside Innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 50, No. 4 (Summer 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Brabham, D. 2008. Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 75--90Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Brewer, I., MacEachren, A. M., Abdo, H., Gundrum, J. and Otto, G. 2000. "Collaborative Geographic Visualization: Enabling shared understanding of environmental processes," IEEE Information Visualization Symposium, Salt Lake City Utah, Oct. 9-10, pp. 137--141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Brown, T. 2008. Design Thinking, Harvard Business Review (June 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Buchanan, R. 1992. Wicked Problems in Design Thinking, Design Issues, vol. 8, no. 2 (Spring 1992) pp. 5--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Chaordix, 2011. Why Crowdsource? http://www.chaordix.com/why-crowdsourceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., and West J. (eds.), 2006. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. CoMotion, General Dynamics C4 Systems, online at http://www.gdc4s.com/content/detail.cfm?item=32341561-76f9-40f8-8ad5-0f0d66dd240e, accessed 12/12/2010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Constant, D, Sproull, L., and Kiesler, 1996. "The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice," Organization Science, vol. 7, no. 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Convertino, G., Mentis, H. M., Rosson, M. B., Carroll, J. M., Slavkovic, A. & Ganoe, C. H. 2008. Articulating Common Ground in Cooperative Work: Content and Process, Proc. CHI, pp. 1637--1646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. De Bono, E. 1970. Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step By Step, Harper Perennial.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Edelson, D. C., Pea, R. D., and Gomez, L. 1995. Constructivism in the Collaboratory, in B. G. Wilson (ed.), Constructivist Learning Environments: Case studies in instructional design, Educational Technology Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Faste, R. 1987. Perceiving Needs, SAE Journal, Society of Automotive Engineers, online at http://www.fastefoundation.org/publications/perceiving_needs.pdf, accessed 12/01/2010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Faste, R. 1993. An Improved Model for Understanding Creativity and Convention, in Cary A. Fisher (ed.), ASME Resource Guide to Innovation in Engineering Design, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New YorkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Faste, R. 1994. Ambidextrous Thinking, Innovations in Mechanical Engineering Curricula for the 1990s, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Faste, R. 1995. A Visual Essay on Invention and Innovation. Keynote Article, Design Management Journal, vol. 6, no. 2 (Spring 1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Felstiner, A. 2010. Working the Crowd: Employment and Labor Law in the Crowdsourcing Industry, online at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1593853, accessed 12/10/2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Felstiner, A. 2010. Sweatshop or Paper Route?: Child Labor Laws and In-Game Work, CrowdConf, 2010, online at http://crowdconf.com/images/finalpapers/felstiner.pdf, accessed 12/10/2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Fischer, G., Grudin, J., McCall, R., Ostwald, J., Redmiles, D., Reeves, B., and Shipman, F. 2001. Seeding, Evolutionary Growth and Reseeding: The Incremental Development of Collaborative Design Environments, in Gary M. Olson, Thomas W. Malone, and John B. Smith (eds.), Coordination Theory and Collaboration Technology, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Fitzgerald, B., Oi, I. 2004. Free Culture: Cultivating the Creative Commons. Media and Arts Law Review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Forlizzi, J. and Battarbee, K. 2004. Understanding Experience in Interactive Systems, Proc. DIS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Forster, F. 2008. Distributed Creative Problem Solving over the Web, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Gero, J. and Maher, M. L., 1993. Modeling Creativity and Knowledge-Based Creative Design, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Gouldner, A. W. 1960. The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement, American Sociological Review, vol. 25, no. 2 (April 1960).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Halsted, C. 2010. Design as cultural imperialism, homogenization and biased intellectual capital?, OpenIDEO posting, online at http://openideo.com/open/what-is-the-global-challenge-that-most-concerns-you-right-now-and-that-global-innovation-leaders-could-begin-to-solve/agenda-concepts/design-as-cultural-imperialism-homogenization-and-intellectual-capital/, accessed 12/9/2010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Hargadon, A., and Sutton, R. I. 1997. Technology Brokering and Innovation in a Product Development Firm, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Heer, J., and Agrawala, M. 2007. Design considerations for collaborative visual analytics, Proc. IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Howe, J. 2008. Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd is Driving the Future of Business, Three Rivers Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Keel, P. 2007. EWall: A Visual Analytics Environment for Collaborative Sensemaking, Information Visualization, vol. 6, pp. 48--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Kelley, T., Littman, J. and Peters, T. 2001. The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America's Leading Design Firm, Crown Business.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Kim, A. J., 2000. Community building on the web: Secret strategies for successful online communities, Peachpit Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Kleemann, F., and Rieder, K. 2008. Un(der)paid Innovators: The Commercial Utilization of Consumer Work through Crowdsourcing, Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1 (July 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Kogut, B., and Metiu, A. 2001. Open Source Software Development and Distributed Innovation, Oxford Review of Economic Policy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Kvan, T. 2000. Collaborative Design: What is it?, Automation in Construction, vol. 9, no. 4 (July 2000).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Lakhani, K. R., and von Hippel, E. 2003. How open source software works: 'free' user-to-user assistance, Research Policy, vol. 32, pp. 923--943.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Lakhani, K. and Panetta, J. 2007. The Principles of Distributed Innovation, Innovations, vol 2., no. 3 (Summer 2007) pp. 97--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Langrish, J. 1982. Cycles of Optimism in Design, Design Studies, vol. 3, no. 3 (July 1982) pp. 153--156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Laurel, B. (ed.). 2003. Design Research: Methods and Perspectives, MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Leonardi, P. 2011 (in press). Innovation Blindness: Culture, Frames, and Cross-Boundary Problem Construction in The Development of New Technology Concepts, Organization Science. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Lessig, L. 2004. Free Culture, Penguin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Mark, G., Carpenter, K. and Kobsa, A. 2003. A Model of Synchronous Collaborative Information Visualization, Sixth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV03), London, England, pp. 373--381. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Mark, G., Carpenter, K., and Kobsa, A. 2004. Are There Benefits in Seeing Double? A study of collaborative information visualization, Proc. CHI, pp. 840--841 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. McKim, R. 1980. Experiences in Visual Thinking, Brooks/Cole.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Miller, J., Friedman, B., Jancke, G., and Gill, B. 2007. Value Tensions in Design: The Value Sensitive Design, Development, and Appropriation of a Corporation's Groupware System, Proc. GROUP'07. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Moran, G. 2010. The Mob Scene: How can crowdsourcing work for your business?, Entrepreneur Magazine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Nagasundaram, M., and Bostrom, R. P. 1994. The structuring of creative processes using GSS: a framework for research, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 11, no. 3 (December 1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Nathan, L. P., Klasnja, P. V., and Friedman, B. 2007. Value Scenarios: A Technique for Envisioning Systemic Effects of New Technologies, Proc. CHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Nelson, L., Held, C., Pirolli, P., Hong, L., Schiano, D., and Chi, E. H. 2009. With a Little Help From My Friends: examining the impact of social annotations in sensemaking tasks, Proc. CHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Niedner, S., Hertel, G., Hermann, S. 2000. Motivation in Open Source Projects: An Empirical Study Among Linux Developers, summary at http://www.psychologie.uni-kiel.de/linux-studyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Nijstad, B. A., Diehl, M. and Stroebe, W. 2003. Cognitive Stimulation and Interference in Idea-Generating Groups, in Paul B. Paulus and Bernard Arjan Nijstad (eds.), Group Creativity: innovation through collaboration, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Patnaik, D., and Becker, R. 1999. Needfinding: The Why and How of Uncovering People's Needs, Design Management Journal (Spring 1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Patnaik, D. 2010. Forget Design Thinking and Try Hybrid Thinking, Fast Company (August 25, 2009) online at http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/dev-patnaik/innovation/forget-design-thinking-and-try-hybrid-thinking, accessed 12/11/2010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Patnaik, D. 2009. Wired to Care: How Companies Prosper When They Create Widespread Empathy, FT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Peters, T. J., and Waterman, R. H. 2004. In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies, Harper Business Essentials.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Pirolli, P. 2009. An Elementary Social Information Foraging Model, Proc. CHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Preece, J. 2000. Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability, Wiley Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Riggs, W, and von Hippel, E. 1994. Incentives to Innovate and the Sources of Innovation: The Case of Scientific Instruments, Research Policy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Robinson, K. 2001. Out of Our Minds: Learning to be Creative, Capstone.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Ross, J., Irani, L., Silberman, M. S., Zaldivar, A., Tomlinson, B. 2010. Who are the Crowdworkers? Shifting Demographics in Mechanical Turk, Proc. CHI extended abstracts, pp. 2863--2872. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Sawant, N., Scharver, C., Leigh, J., Johnson, A., Reinhart, G., Creel, E., Batchu, S., Bailey, S. and Grossman, R. 2000. The Tele-Immersive Data Explorer: A Distributed Architecture for Collaborative Interactive Visualization of Large Data-sets, 4th International Immersive Projection Technology Workshop, Ames, Iowa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Shedroff, N. 2009. Design Is the Problem: The Future of Design Must be Sustainable, Rosenfeld Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Shockley, B. 2006. A Short History of Idea Management and What Makes it Work, http://www.innovationtools.com/PDF/History_of_Idea_Mgmt.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Silberman, M., Irani, L., Ross, J. 2010. Ethics and Tactics of Professional Crowdwork, XRDS, vol. 17, no. 2 (Winter 2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Stasko, J., Görg C., and Liu, Z. 2008. Jigsaw: supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization, Information Visualization, vol. 7, pp. 118--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Sternberg, R., and Lubart, T. 1999. Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity, Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Sutton, R. 2007. Weird Ideas That Work: How to Build a Creative Company, Free Press, 2007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Swan, J, Newell, S., Scarbrough, H. and Hislop, D. 1999. Knowledge Management and Innovation: Networks and Networking, Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 262--275Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Viégas, F., Wattenberg, M., Kriss, J., and van Ham, F. 2007. Talk Before You Type: Coordination in Wikipedia, Proc. 40th Hawaii International Conference of System Sciences, Computer Society Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing Innovation, MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Wang, H.-C., Cosley, D., and Fussell, S. R. 2010. Idea Expander: Supporting group brainstorming with conversationally triggered visual thinking stimuli, Proc. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Wheless, G. H., Lascara, C. M., Cox, D., Patterson, R., Levy, S., Johnson, A., Leigh, J., and Kapoor, A., 1999. The Use of Collaborative Virtual Environments in the Mine Countermeasures Mission," proc. SPIE, vol. 3711.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Whitla, P. 2009. Crowdsourcing and Its Application in Marketing Activities, Contemporary Management Research, Vol. 5, No. 1 (March 2009) pp. 15--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. Wright, P. and McCarthy, J. 2008. Empathy and Experience in HCI, Proc. CHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Wright, B., Payne, J., Steckman, M., and Stevson, S. 2009. Palantir: A visualization platform for real-world analysis, Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Zittrain, J. 2008. Ubiquitous Human Computing, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Opening "open" innovation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          DPPI '11: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces
          June 2011
          492 pages
          ISBN:9781450312806
          DOI:10.1145/2347504

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 22 June 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate27of53submissions,51%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader