skip to main content
research-article

A bricolage perspective on healthcare information systems design: an improvisation model

Published:20 August 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Pressured by escalating costs, continual demand for high quality, and the speed of technological advances, the need for change and improvisation has become a critical priority for the healthcare industry. Now society demands that healthcare providers offer better patient care through the careful use of information technologies. For that, practitioners are urged to expand the boundaries of innovative IS design strategies. Unfortunately, research on healthcare information systems (HIS) improvisation remains relatively underdeveloped. Thus, this study uses the organizational improvisation and bricolage theoretical lenses, from the perspective of a case study, to examine how strategic improvisation might give rise to fruitful HIS novel design performances. Theoretically, we provide an inductively derived strategic conceptual model of improvisation that couples with network, structure, and institutional bricolage to execute a 'resource-time-effort' model. This enables us to improvise a superior HIS that offers quality patient-centric healthcare delivery and a valuable improvisation model. Professionally, this study contributes three key insights for IS improvisation in the healthcare industry.

References

  1. Aktas, E. Ulengin, E. and Onsel Sahin, S. (2007). A decision support system to improve the efficiency of resource allocation in healthcare management. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 41, 130--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Alexandra Hospital (2009). "Alexandra Hospital--about us". Retrieved 10 April, 2009, from http://www.alexhosp.com.sg/index.php/about_us/our_historyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, G.F., Frogner, B.K., Johns, R.A. and Reinhardt, U.E. (2006). Health Care Spending and Use of Information Technology, in OECD Countries, Health Affairs, 25(3), 819--831.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Arora, V., Ward, K. and Petter, S. (2010). The Role of Information Systems to Support Improvisation during Emergencies. Mid-West AIS 2010 Proceedings. http://aisel.aisnet.org/mwais2010/11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ash, J. S. Berg, M. and Coiera, E. (2004). Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors, Journal of American Medical Informatics Association,, 11, 104--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Augier, M. Shariq, S.Z. and Vendelo, M.T. (2001). Understanding the context: its emergence, transformation and role in tacit knowledge sharing,, Journal of Knowledge Management 5, 125--136Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Baker, T. and Nelson, R.E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly 50, 329--366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Baker, T. Miner, A.S. and Eesley, D.T. (2003). Improvising Firms: Bricolage, Account Giving and Improvisational Competencies in the Founding Process. Research Policy, 32, 255--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Bansler, J.P. and Havn, E.C. (2010). Pilot Implementation of Health Information Systems: Issues and Challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79, 637--648.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bardach, N., Huang, J., Brand, R. and Hsu (2009). Evolving health information technology and the timely availability of visit diagnosis from ambulatory visits: A natural experiment in an integrated delivery care system, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 9 (1), 35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Barnes, S.J. (2001). Experiences in Strategic Information Systems Implementation in UK Healthcare, in R. Stegwee and TAM Spil (eds) Strategies for healthcare information systems, IGI Publishing, 11--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Barrett, F. (1998). Creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations: Implications for organizational learning. Organizational Science, 9(5), 543--555. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Bates, D.W. (2002). The quality case for information technology in healthcare, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2(7), 35--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernstein, M.L., McCreless, T. and Cote, M.J. (2007). Five Constants of Information Technology Adoption in Healthcare, Hospital Topics, 85 (1), 17--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Bodenheimer, T. (2005). High and Rising Health Care Costs. Part 2: Technologic Innovation, Annals of Internal Medicine, 142 (11), 932--937.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown, S. L. and Eisenhardt, K.M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20, 343--378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Burner, E. (1993). Epilogue: Creative persona and the problem of authenticity. In S. Lavie, K. Narayan, and R. Rosaldo (eds), Creativity/Anthropology. New York, Cornell University Press: Ithaca.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Castro, D. (2007). Improving Health Care: Why a Dose of IT May Be Just What the Doctor Ordered, The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, Washington, DC. pp. 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Chan, ML, Hackney, R. and Pan, SL. (2011). Managing e-Government Systems Implementation: A Resource Enactment Perspective. European Journal Information Systems, 20, 529--541.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Ciborra, C. (1999). Notes on Improvisations and Time in Organisations, Accounting. Management and Information Technologies, 9, 77--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ciborra, C. (2002). The labyrinths of information: Challenging the wisdom of systems. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Cleaver, F. (2003). Reinventing institutions: Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. In T.A. Benjaminsen and C. Lund (eds) Securing Land Rights in Africa, London, Frank Cass, 11--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Crossan, M. (1997). Improvise to innovate. Ivey Business Journal, 62, 36--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Crossan, M. Cunha, M.P. Vera, D. and Cunha, J.V. (2005). Time and organisational improvisation Academy of Management Review 30, 129--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Crossan, M. and Sorrenti, M. (1997). Making Sense of Improvisation, Advances in Strategic Management, 14, 155--180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Cunha, J, Cunha, M., and Cunha, R. (2000). Improvisation and Learning: Soulmates or just friends? in Innovative Theories, Tools and Practices in Work and Organizational Psychology. M. Vartiainen, F. Avallone and N. Anderson (eds). 307--320. Seattle, WA Hogrefe and Huber.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Cunha, M.P. Cunha J.V. and Clegg, S.R. (2009). Improvisation bricolage: a practice-based approach to strategy and foresight. In: Costanzo, L.A. and MacKay, R.B. (eds), Handbook of research on strategy and foresight. Edward Elgar Publishing, New York, 182--199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Cunha, M.P. Cunha, J.V. and Kamoche, K. (1999). Organisational Improvisation: What, When, How and Why. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1, 299--341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Detmer, D.E. (2000). Information technology for quality health care: A summary of United Kingdom and United States experiences, Quality in Healthcare Care, 9 (3), 181--189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Duymedjian, R. and Ruling, C-C. (2010). Towards a foundation of bricolage in organisation and management theory. Organisation Studies, 31, 133--151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Eisenhardt, K.M. and Martin, J.A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 11005--11021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989a). Making fast strategic decision in high-velocity environments. Academy Management of Journal, 32(3) 543--576.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989b). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 534--550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Ferneley, E. and Bell, F. (2006). Using bricolage to integrate business and information technology innovation in SMEs. Technovation, 26, 232--241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Garud R. and Karnoe P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32, 277--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Heeks, R. (2006). Health Information Systems: Failure, Success and Improvisation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75, 125--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Helfat, E., Constance, A. and Peteraf, M. (2003). The Dynamic Resource-Based View: Capability Lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 997--1010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E. (1999). Consensus Building as Role Playing and Bricolage: Toward a Theory of Collaborative Planning, Journal of the American Planning Association. 65, 9--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Kamoche, K. Cunha, M.P. and Cunha, J.V. (2003). Towards a Theory of Organisational Improvisation: Looking Beyond the Jazz Metaphor. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 2023--2051.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Kelly, H., Chiasson, M., Downey, A. and Pacaud, D. (2011). The Clinical Impact of eHealth on the Self-Management of Diabetes: A Double Adoption, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(Special Issue), 208--234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Klein, H. and Myers, M. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 23, 67--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Lau, F. Doze, S. Vincent D. Wilson, D. Noseworthy, T. Hayward, R. and Penn, A. (1999). Patterns of improvisation for evidence-based practice in clinical settings. Information Technology and People, 12, 287--303Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Lawson, B. and Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: A dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5, 377--400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review 24, 691--710.Levi-Strauss, C. (1966) The savage mind. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Lee, A.S. and Baskerville, R.I. (2003). Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research, Information Systems Research, 14(3), 221--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. McKnight, B. and Bontis, N. (2002). E-Improvisation: Collaborative Groupware Technology Expands the Reach and Effectiveness of Organizational Improvisation. Knowledge and Process Management, 9, 219--227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Mechanic, D. (2010). Replicating high-quality medical care organisations, Journal of American Medical Association, 303, 555--556.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Miner, A.S., Bassoff, P. and Moorman, C. (2001). Organisational improvisation and learning: a field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 246--275.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. Free Press. New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Montealegre, R. (2002). A Process Model of Capability Development: Lessons from the Electronic Commerce Strategy at Bolsa de Valores de Guayaquil. Organisation Science, 13, 514--531. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Moorman, C. and Miner, A.S. (1998). The convergence of planning and execution: improvisation in new product development. Journal of Marketing, 62, 1--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Oliver, J. (2009). Creativity as Openness: Improvising Health and Care Situations. Health Care Analysis, 17, 318--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Overby, E. Bharadwaj, A. and Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise Agility and the Enabling Role of Information Technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 120--131. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Pan, S.L., Pan, G., Chen, JW. and Hsieh, M-H. (2007). The Dynamics of Implementing and Managing Modularity of Organizational Routines during Capability Development: Insights from a Process Model? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 54(4), 800--813.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Pan, S.L., Pan, G. and Hsieh, M.H. (2006). A Dual-Level Analysis of the Capability Development Process: A Case Study of TT&T, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1814--1829. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Pan, S.L. and Tan, B.C.C. (2011). Demystifying Case Research: A Structured-Pragmatic-Situational (SPS) Approach for Conducting Case Research. Information and Organization, 21, 161--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Payton, F., Pare, G., LeRouge, C. and Reddy, M (2011). Health Care IT: Perspective, Process, People, Patients and Interdisciplinary Considerations, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12 (Special Issue), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Pentland, B.T. (1999). Building process theory with narrative: From Description to Explanation. Academy of Management Review, 24, 711--724Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Pollock, T.G., Porac, J.G. and Wade, J.B. (2004). The external control of organizations, classic. (ed.) Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Poolton, J. and Ismail. H. (2000). New developments in innovation. Journal of Managerial Psychology 13, 795--811.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Pratt, M.G. (2009). From the Editors: For the Lack of a Boilerplate: Tips on Writing up (and reviewing) Qualitative Research. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 856--862.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Silva, L.O. and Hirschheim, R. (2007). Fighting Against Windmills: Strategic Information Systems and Organisational Deep Structures, Special Issue on Information Systems in Developing Countries. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 327--354. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A. and Ireland, R.D. (2007). Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box. Academy of Management Review, 32, 273--292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Strauss, C.L. (1967). The Savage Mind. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Tan, B. Pan, S. Chou, T. and Huang, S. (2010). Enabling Agility through Routinized Improvisation in IT Deployment: The Case of Chang Chun Petrochemicals, International Conference on Information Systems ICIS 2010 "Information Technology: Gateway to the Future", St. Louis, United States, 15th December 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Teoh, S.Y. (2010). Competency and Capability Development Process: An SME Enterprise System Upgrade and Implementation. Journal of Information Technology Management, 21, 36--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Teoh, S.Y., Pan, S-L. and Ramchand, A.M. (2010). Resource Management Activities in Healthcare Information Systems: A Process Perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, Viewed on Nov 2010, http://www.springerlink.com/content/n42l26508352515g/fulltext.pdf Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Tyrell, S. (2002). Using Information and Com- munication Technology in Healthcare, Oxford, Radcliffe Medical Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Vendelo, M.T. (2009). Improvisation and Learning in Organisations: An Opportunity for Future Empirical Research. Management Learning, 40, 449--456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Vera, D. and Crossan, M. (2005). Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organisation Science, 16,203--224 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and Method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 74--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Walsham, G. (2006). Doing Interpretive Research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 320--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Weick, K.E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organisational analysis, Organisation Science, 9, 357--381. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Wickramasinghe N., Bali R.K. and Geisler E. (2007). The major barriers and facilitators for the adoption and implementation of knowledge management in healthcare operations, International Journal of Electronic Healthcare, 3, 367--381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Wickramasinghe N., Bali R.K. and Gibbons M.C. (2009). A Systematic Approach: Optimization of Healthcare Operations with Knowledge Management. Journal of Healthcare Information Management, 23, 44--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Zheng, Y., Venters, W. and Cornford, T. (2010). Collective agility, paradox and organizational improvisation: the development of a particle physics grid. Information Systems Journal, 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.0036.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A bricolage perspective on healthcare information systems design: an improvisation model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader