skip to main content
10.1145/2380718.2380725acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

We love rock 'n' roll: analyzing and predicting friendship links in Last.fm

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Music plays an important role in our everyday lives. Not surprisingly, shared musical taste is said to lead to social attraction. In this paper, we study in detail friendship links on the social music platform Last.fm, asking for similarities in taste as well as on demographic attributes and local network structure. On Last.fm, users connect to 'online' friends as usual, but also indicate strong 'real-life' friends by co-attending the same events. Thus, we can contrast these online ties with offline links of different strength. Complementing the analysis, we learn to predict both kinds of ties automatically, including public interaction data as additional relevant features. Our results emphasize the predictive power of the simple measure of mutual friends, while the indicative value of similarity on taste (though increasing with tie strength) is negligible.

References

  1. Adamic, L. A., and Adar, E. Friends and neighbors on the web. Social Networks 25, 3 (2003), 211--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Adamic, L. A., Buyukkokten, O., and Adar, E. A social network caught in the web. First Monday 8, 6 (2003).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Au Yeung, C.-m., and Iwata, T. Strength of social influence in trust networks in product review sites. In Proc. WSDM (2011), 495--504. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Backstrom, L., and Leskovec, J. Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks. In Proc. WSDM (2011), 635--644. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bayma, N. K., and Ledbetter, A. Tunes that bind? predicting friendship strength in a music-based social network. Information, Communication & Society 12, 3 (2009), 408--427.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Boer, D., Fischer, R., Strack, M., Bond, M. H., Lo, E., and Lam, J. How shared preferences in music create bonds between people: Values as the missing link. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37, 9 (2011), 1159--1171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Burt, R. S. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110, 2 (2004), 349--399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Crandall, D., Cosley, D., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., and Suri, S. Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities. In Proc. KDD (2008), 160--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Friedkin, N. E. A test of structural features of granovetter's strength of weak ties theory. Social Networks 2, 4 (1980), 411--422.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Gardikiotis, A., and Baltzis, A. 'rock music for myself and justice to the world!': Musical identity, values, and music preferences. Psychology of Music 40, 2 (2012), 143--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gilbert, E., and Karahalios, K. Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proc. CHI (2009), 211--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Golder, S. A., and Yardi, S. Structural predictors of tie formation in twitter: Transitivity and mutuality. In Proc. SocialCom (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Granovetter, M. The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociological Theory 1 (1983), 201--233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Groh, G., and Ehmig, C. Recommendations in taste related domains: collaborative filtering vs. social filtering. In Proc. GROUP (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., and Witten, I. H. The weka data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explorations 11, 1 (2009), 10--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hopcroft, J. E., Lou, T., and Tang, J. Who will follow you back?: reciprocal relationship prediction. In Proc. CIKM (2011), 1137--1146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kahanda, I., and Neville, J. Using transactional information to predict link strength in online social networks. In Proc. ICWSM (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. La Fond, T., and Neville, J. Randomization tests for distinguishing social influence and homophily effects. In Proc. WWW (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lee, D. H., and Brusilovsky, P. Social networks and interest similarity: the case of citeulike. In Proc. Hypertext (2010), 151--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Leskovec, J., and Horvitz, E. Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network. In Proc. WWW (2008), 915--924. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Liben-Nowell, D., and Kleinberg, J. The link prediction problem for social networks. In Proc. CIKM (2003), 556--559. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Liu, H. Social network profiles as taste performances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13, 1 (2007), 252--275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Marsden, P. V., and Campbell, K. E. Measuring tie strength. Social Forces 63, 2 (1984), 482--501.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., and Cook, J. M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27 (2001), 415--444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Meeder, B., Karrer, B., Sayedi, A., Ravi, R., Borgs, C., and Chayes, J. We know who you followed last summer: inferring social link creation times in twitter. In Proc. WWW (2011), 517--526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Mislove, A., Marcon, M., Gummadi, P. K., Druschel, P., and Bhattacharjee, B. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In Proc. Internet Measurement Comference (2007), 29--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Mislove, A., Viswanath, B., and K. P. Gummadi, P. D. You are who you know: Inferring user profiles in online social networks. In Proc. WSDM (2010), 251--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Rentfrow, P. J., and Gosling, S. D. The do re mis of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84, 6 (2003), 1236--1256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Schifanella, R., Barrat, A., Cattuto, C., Markines, B., and Menczer, F. Folks in folksonomies: Social link prediction from shared metadata. In Proc. WSDM (2010), 271--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Shi, X., Adamic, L. A., and Strauss, M. J. Networks of strong ties. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 378, 1 (2007), 33--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Sinnott, R. Virtues of the haversine. Sky and Telescope 68, 2 (1984), 159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Thelwall, M. Homophily in myspace. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60, 2 (2009), 219--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Verbrugge, L. M. The structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces 56, 2 (1977), 576--597.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Wu, A., DiMicco, J. M., and Millen, D. R. Detecting professional versus personal closeness using an enterprise social network site. In Proc. CHI (2010), 1955--1964. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Xiang, R., Neville, J., and Rogati, M. Modeling relationship strength in online social networks. In Proc. WWW (2010), 981--990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Yang, S.-H., Long, B., Smola, A., Sadagopan, N., Zheng, Z., and Zha, H. Like like alike: joint friendship and interest propagation in social networks. In Proc. WWW (2011), 537--546. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. We love rock 'n' roll: analyzing and predicting friendship links in Last.fm

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WebSci '12: Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference
      June 2012
      531 pages
      ISBN:9781450312288
      DOI:10.1145/2380718

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate218of875submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      Websci '24
      16th ACM Web Science Conference
      May 21 - 24, 2024
      Stuttgart , Germany

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader