skip to main content
10.1145/2382936.2383037acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbcbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Robust differential co-expression discovery: an insight into pharmacodynamics of tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Published:07 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Studies of gene expression in drug sensitive and resistant cell lines can help us understand mechanisms of drug resistance, side effects and uncover new potential drug targets. Such analyzes require methods that move beyond uni-variate tests of differential expression. Here we propose a new differential co-expression analysis framework to detect molecular mechanism of drug sensitivity. We started with the Fisher's Z transformation to measure the co-expression difference. Then we developed a novel method to conquer the common problems Fisher's Z transformation cannot handle -- heterogeneity of cell line tissue types, outlying samples or clusters and relatively small number of samples. We generated a tightly inter-linked network of dasatinib related genes, connected by differential co-expression and significant inter-correlation. We observed three main types of differential co-expression. We did literature survey of result gene pairs and confirmed that genes in the detected pairs are related to dasatinib, or related to each other. Such discoveries bring new insights on this second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

References

  1. R. Fisher. Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population. Biometrika, 10(4):507--521, 1915.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. O. Hantschel, U. Rix, and G. Superti-Furga. Target spectrum of the BCR-ABL inhibitors imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib. Leukemia & Lymphoma, 49(4):615--619, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Kayano, I. Takigawa, M. Shiga, K. Tsuda, and H. Mamitsuka. ROS-DET: robust detector of switching mechanisms in gene expression. Nucleic Acids Research, 39(11):e74--e74, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Y. Lai, B. Wu, L. Chen, and H. Zhao. A statistical method for identifying differential gene--gene co-expression patterns. Bioinformatics, 20(17):3146--3155, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. E. Lanford, B. Guerra, C. B. Bigger, H. Lee, D. Chavez, and K. M. Brasky. Lack of response to exogenous interferon-a in the liver of chimpanzees chronically infected with hepatitis C virus. Hepatology, 46(4):999--1008, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. K. Li. Genome-wide coexpression dynamics: theory and application. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(26):16875, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. J. Zhang, Y. Ji, and L. Zhang. Extracting three-way gene interactions from microarray data. Bioinformatics, 23(21):2903--2909, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Robust differential co-expression discovery: an insight into pharmacodynamics of tyrosine kinase inhibitor

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            BCB '12: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine
            October 2012
            725 pages
            ISBN:9781450316705
            DOI:10.1145/2382936

            Copyright © 2012 Authors

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 October 2012

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • poster

            Acceptance Rates

            BCB '12 Paper Acceptance Rate33of159submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate254of885submissions,29%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader