skip to main content
10.1145/2396556.2396577acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesancsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Host-based multi-tenant technology for scalable data center networks

Published:29 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

These days, various academic and industrial institutions are sharing the computing resources of cloud data centers. For the sake of security, data center networks need to be separated by institution or department. One conventional approach is using tag-based VLAN standardized in IEEE 802.1Q. However, this approach cannot accommodate scalable networks because of a limitation on the number of VLAN IDs. To address this problem, we propose HostVLAN, a novel multi-tenant technique for scalable networks. To provide logical isolated networks for individual tenants (e.g., academic and industrial institutions), end host servers deployed in a data center filter receiving network data and forward them to designated virtual machines on the basis of isolation information. To reduce the broadcast traffic for the protocols, ARP and DHCP, end host servers convert the broadcast data into unicast data. Unlike conventional approaches that work in cooperation with switches, HostVLAN provides multi-tenant environments at the end-host-server side. To build a HostVLAN-based network architecture, we extended three virtual network switches supported by KVM and Xen VMMs. The results of performance evaluation demonstrate that HostVLAN can be scaled up to large numbers of multitenant networks with little overhead.

References

  1. amazon.com. Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud. http://aws.amazon.com/ec2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. K. Barabash, R. Cohen, D. Hadas, V. Jain, R. Recio, and B. Rochwerger. A Case for Overlays in DCN Virtualization. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Data Center - Converged and Virtual Ethernet Switching, San Francisco, September 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. Barham, B. Dragovic, K. Fraser, S. Hand, T. Harris, A. Ho, R. Neugebauer, I. Pratt, and A. Warfield. Xen and the Art of Virtualization. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, New York, October 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. Davie and E. Gross. A Stateless Transport Tunneling Protocol for Network Virtualization (STT) (draft-davie-stt-02), August 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. L. Dunbar, S. Hares, M. Sridharan, N. Venkataramaiah, and B. Schliesser. Address Resolution for Large Data Center Problem Statement (draft-dunbar-armd-problem-statement-01.txt), March 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Edwards, A. Fischer, and A. Lain. Diverter: A New Approach to Networking Within Virtualized Infrastructures. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Research on Enterprise Network, Barcelona, August 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. K. Elmeleegy and A. Cox. EtherProxy: Scaling Ethernet By Suppressing Broadcast Traffic. In Proceedings of the 28th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, Rio de Janeiro, April 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. A. Greenberg, J. Hamilton, N. Jain, S. Kandula, C. Kim, P. Lahiri, D. Maltz, P. Patel, and S. Sengupta. VL2: A Scalable and Flexible Data Center Network. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2009, Barcelona, August 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. F. Hao, T. Lakshman, S. Mukherjee, and H. Song. Secure Cloud Computing with a Virtualized Network Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing, Boston, June 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. IEEE Computer Society. IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks - Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks, May 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. IEEE Computer Society. IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks - Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks Amendment 7: Provider Backbone Bridges, June 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. C. Kim, M. Caesar, and J. Rexford. Floodless in SEATTLE: A Scalable Ethernet Architecture for Large Enterprises. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2008, Seattle, August 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. KVM. Kernel Based Virtual Machine. http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Main_Page.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Mahalingam, D. Dutt, K. Duda, P. Agarwal, L. Kreeger, T. Sridhar, M. Bursell, and C. Wright. VXLAN: A Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3 Networks (draft-mahalingam-dutt-dcops-vxlan-02.txt), August 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. N. McKeown, T. Anderson, H. Balakrishnan, G. Parulkar, L. Peterson, J. Rexford, S. Shenker, and J. Turner. OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2):69--74, April 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Microsoft. Hyper-V server. http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/hyper-v-server/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Microsoft. Understanding Networking with Hyper-V. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?displaylang=en&familyID=3fac6d40-d6b5--4658-bc54--62b925ed7eea.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Mudigonda, P. Yalagandula, J. Mogul, B. Stiekes, and Y. Pouffary. Netlord: A Scalable Multi-Tenant Network Architecture for Virtualized Datacenters. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2011, Toronto, August 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. R. Mysore, A. Pamboris, N. Farrington, N. Huang, P. Miri, S. Radhakrishnan, V. Subramanya, and A. Vahdat. PortLand: A Scalable Fault-Tolerant Layer 2 Data Center Network Fabric. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2009, Barcelona, August 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. T. Narten, M. Sridharan, D. Dutt, D. Black, and L. Kreeger. Problem Statement: Overlays for Network Virtualization (draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01), October 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Open vSwitch. VLANs. http://openvswitch.org/?page_id=146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. Sridharan, A. Greenberg, N. Venkataramiah, Y. Wang, K. Duda, I. Ganga, G. Lin, M. Pearson, P. Thaler, and C. Tumuluri. NVGRE: Network Virtualization using Generic Routing Encapsulation (draft-stridharan-virtualization-nvgre-01.txt), July 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. VMware, Inc. VMware vShpere Hypervisor (ESXi). http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere-hypervisor/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. VMware, Inc. VMware ESX Server 3: 802.1Q VLAN Solutions, June 2006. http://www.vmware.com/resources/techresources/412.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. T. Wood, A. Gerber, K. Ramakrishnan, P. Shenoy, and J. Merwe. The Case for Enterprise-Ready Virtual Private Clouds. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing, San Diego, June 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Host-based multi-tenant technology for scalable data center networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ANCS '12: Proceedings of the eighth ACM/IEEE symposium on Architectures for networking and communications systems
      October 2012
      270 pages
      ISBN:9781450316859
      DOI:10.1145/2396556

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 October 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate88of314submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader