skip to main content
10.1145/2396761.2398408acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Non-stationary bayesian networks based on perfect simulation

Published:29 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Non-stationary Dynamic Bayesian Networks (Non-stationary DBNs) are widely used to model the temporal changes of directed dependency structures from multivariate time series data. However, the existing change-points based non-stationary DBNs methods have several drawbacks including excessive computational cost, and low convergence speed. In this paper we proposed a novel non-stationary DBNs method. Our method is based on the perfect simulation model. We applied this approach for network structure inference from synthetic data and biological microarray gene expression data and compared it with other two state-of-the-art non-stationary DBNs methods. The experimental results demonstrated that our method outperformed two other state-of-the-art methods in both computational cost and structure prediction accuracy. The further sensitivity analysis showed that once converged our model is robust to large parameter ranges, which reduces the uncertainty of the model behavior.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Chris A. Benedict, Theresa A. Banks, Lionel Senderowicz, Mira Ko, William J. Britt, Ana Angulo, Peter Ghazal, and Carl F. Ware. Lymphotoxins and cytomegalovirus cooperatively induce interferon-b establishing host-virus detente. Immunity, 15:617--626, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. David Maxwell Chickering. Learning equivalence classes of bayesian network structures. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2:445--498, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. Chopin. Dynamic detection of change points in long time series. The Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Michael F. Covington, Satchidananda Panda, Xing Liang Liu, Carl A. Strayer, D. Ry Wagner, and Steve A. Kay. Elf3 modulates resetting of the circadian clock in arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 13:1305--1315, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Frank Dondelinger, Sophie Lebre, and Dirk Husmeier. Heterogeneous continuous dynamic bayesian networks with flexible structure and inter-time segment information sharing. In Proceedings of 2010 International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML10), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Paul Fearnhead. Exact and efficient bayesian inference for multiple changepoint problems. Statistics and Computing, 16:203--213, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Andrew Gelman and Donald B. Rubin. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7:457--472, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Peter J. Green. Reversible jump markov chain monte carlo computation and bayesian model determination. Biometrika, 82:711--732, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Peter J. Green. Trans-dimensional markov chain monte carlo. Highly Structured Stochastic Systems, Oxford University Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Marco Grzegorczy, Dirk Husmeier, Kieron D. Edwards, Peter Ghazal, , and Andrew J. Millar. Modelling non-stationary gene regulatory processes with a non-homogeneous bayesian network and the allocation sampler. Bioinformatics, 24:2071 -- 2078, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Marco Grzegorczyk and Dirk Husmeier. Improvements in the reconstruction of time-varying gene regulatory networks: dynamic programming and regularization by information sharing among genes. Journal of Bioinformatics, 27(5):693--699, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Anthony Hall, Laszlo Kozma-Bognar, RekaToth, Ferenc Nagy, and Andrew J. Millar. Conditional circadian regulation of phytochrome a gene expression. Plant Physiol.,127(4):1808--18, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. David Heckerman, Dan Geiger, and David Maxwell Chickering. Learning bayesian networks: The combination of knowledge and statistGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kenya Honda, Akinori Takaoka, and Tadatsugu Taniguchi. Type i interferon gene induction by the interferon regulatory factor family of transcription factors. Immunity, 25:349--360, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Dirk Husmeier. Sensitivity and specificity of inferring genetic regulatory interactions from microarray experiments with dynamic bayesian networks. Bioinformatics, 19:2271--2282, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Dirk Husmeier, Frank Dondelinger, and Sophie Lebre. Inter-time segment information sharing for non-homogeneous dynamic bayesian networks. In Proceedings of 2010 Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Katja Ickstadt, Bjorn Bornkamp, Marco Grzegorczyk, Jakob Wieczorek, M. Rahuman Sheriff, Hernan E. Grecco, and Eli Zamir. Nonparametric bayesian networks. In: Bernardo, Bayarri, Berger, Dawid, Heckerman, Smith, and West (eds): Bayesian Statistics 9, Oxford University Press, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yi Jia and Jun Huan. Constructing non-stationary dynamic bayesian networks with a flexible lag choosing mechanism. BMC Bioinformatics, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. JE Darnell Jr, IM Kerr, and GR Stark. Jak-stat pathways and transcriptional activation in response to ifns and other extracellular signaling proteins. Science, 264:1415--1421, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Yoshinobu Kawahara and Masashi Sugiyama. Change-point detection in time-series data by direct densityratio estimation. In Proceedings of 2009 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM09), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. M. Lavielle and G. Teyssillree. Adaptive detection of multiple change-points in asset price volatility. Long Memory in Economics, page 129lC156, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sophie Lebre, Jennifer Becq, Frederic Devaux, Michael Stumpf, and Gaelle Lelandais. Statistical inference of the time-varying structure of gene regulation networks. BMC Systems Biology, 4(1):130, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Robert Lund and Jaxk Reeves. Detection of undocumented changepoints: a revision of the two-phase regression model. J. Climate, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Paloma Mas. Circadian clock function in arabidopsis thaliana: time beyond transcription. Trends Cell Biology, 18:273--181, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Takeshi Mizuno and Norihito Nakamichi. Pseudo-response regulators (prrs) or true oscillator components (tocs). Plant Cell Physiol., 46(5):677--685, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. V. Moskvina and A. Zhigljavsky. An algorithm based on singular spectrum analysis for changepoint detection. Communications in Statistics Part B: Simulation and Computation, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Agostino Nobile and Alastair T. Fearnside. Bayesian finite mixtures with an unknown number of components: The allocation sampler. Statistics and Computing, 17:147--162, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Alessia Para, Eva M. Farre, Takato Imaizumi, Jose L. Pruneda-Paz, Franklin G. Harmon, and Steve A. Kay. Prr3 is a vascular regulator of toc1 stability in the arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell, 19(11):3462--73, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. A. Pievatolo and Peter J. Green. Bounary detection through dynamic polygons. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 60:609--626, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Arvind Rao, Alfred O. Hero III, David J. States, and James Douglas Engel. Inferring time-varying network topologies from gene expression data. EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Sobia Raza, Kevin A Robertson, Paul A Lacaze, David Page, Anton J Enright, Peter Ghazal, and Tom C Freeman. A logic-based diagram of signalling pathways central to macrophage activation. BMC System Biology, 2:Article 36, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Joshua W Robinson and Alexander J Hartemink. Non-stationary dynamic bayesian networks. Procedding of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Conference, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Patrice A. Salome and C. Robertson McClung. The arabidopsis thaliana clock. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 19(5):425--435, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Le Song, Mladen Kolar, and Eric Xing. Time-varying dynamic bayesian networks. NIPS, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Adriano V. Werhli, Marco Grzegorczyk, and Dirk Husmeier. Comparative evaluation of reverse engineering gene ,Bioinformatics, 22 (17):2129--2135, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Wentao Zhao, Erchin Serpedin, and Edward R. Dougherty. Inferring gene regulatory networks from time series data using the minimum description length principle. Bioinformatics, 22(17):2129-2135, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Non-stationary bayesian networks based on perfect simulation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '12: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
      October 2012
      2840 pages
      ISBN:9781450311564
      DOI:10.1145/2396761

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 October 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader