skip to main content
10.1145/2399016.2399041acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How designers can make sense of qualitative research findings: a case study

Published:14 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

How to communicate qualitative research findings so that they make sense, become useful and manage to inspire designers is still an issue in HCI. There is a need for methods and tools supporting this transfer of knowledge and stimulate design thinking. But before we can form methods and tools we need carefully presented case studies to help us shape these methods and tools. In this paper we present how we made use of the extreme characters method to communicate the essence of a high-level typology formed from eight narrative interviews on the meaning of home. We describe how applying this method enabled a group of eight workshop participants, unfamiliar with the typology, to use the typology to generate a range of innovative design features and open up new design spaces.

References

  1. Baumer, E. P. S. and Silberman, M. S. (2011): When the Implication Is Not to Design (Technology). In Proc. CHI'11, 2271--2274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Biskjaer, M. M., Dalsgaard, P. and Halskov, K. (2010). Creativity methods in interaction design. In Proc. DESIRE'10, 12--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Blomquist, A and Arvola, M. (2002). Personas in action: ethnography in an interaction design team. In Proc. NordiCHI'02, 197--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Djajadiningrat, J. P., Gaver, W. W. and Fres, J. W. (2000). Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: methods for exploring aesthetic interactions. In Proc. DIS'00, 66--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dourish, P. (2006). Implications for design. In Proc. CHI'06, 541--550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Evers, H. (2009). The Documentary Method in Intercultural Research Scenarios. In: Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fleck, R. and Fitzpatrick, G. (2010). Reflecting on reflection: framing a design landscape. In Proc. OZCHI'10, 216--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Flick, U. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Fourth Edition. SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Obrist, M., Wurhofer, D., Sundström, P., Beck, E., Buie, E., and Hoonhout, J. (2012). The Message in the Bottle: Best Practices for Transferring the Knowledge from Qualitative User Studies. Workshop at DIS'12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Petersen, M. G., Lynggaard, A. B., Krogh, P. G. and Winther, I. W. (2010). Tactics for homing in mobile life: a fieldwalk study of extremely mobile people. In Proc. MobileHCI'10, 265--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Westerlund, B. (2005). Design space conceptual tool - grasping the design process. In Proc. Nordes'05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. How designers can make sense of qualitative research findings: a case study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '12: Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design
      October 2012
      834 pages
      ISBN:9781450314824
      DOI:10.1145/2399016

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 October 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      NordiCHI '12 Paper Acceptance Rate84of341submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader