skip to main content
research-article

Tones for real: Managing multipath in underwater acoustic wakeup

Published:01 April 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The principles of sensor networks—low-power, wireless, in-situ sensing with many inexpensive sensors—are only recently penetrating into underwater research. Acoustic communication is best suited for underwater communication, with much lower attenuation than RF, but acoustic propagation is five orders-of-magnitude slower than RF, so propagation times stretch to hundreds of milliseconds. Low-power wakeup tones are present in new underwater acoustic modems, and when added to applications and MAC protocols they reduce energy consumption wasted on idle listening. Unfortunately, underwater acoustic tones suffer from self-multipath—echoes unique to the latency that can completely defeat their protocol advantages. We introduce Self-Reflection Tone Learning (SRTL), a novel approach where nodes use Bayesian techniques to address interference by learning to discriminate self-reflections from noise and independent communication. We present detailed experiments using an acoustic modem in controlled and uncontrolled, in-air and underwater environments. These experiments demonstrate that SRTL's knowledge corresponds to physical-world predictions, that it can cope with underwater noise and reasonable levels of artificial noise, and that it can track a changing multipath environment. Simulations confirm that these real-world experiments generalize over a wide range of conditions.

References

  1. Benthos, Inc. Fast And Reliable Access To Undersea Data. http://www.benthos.com/pdf/Modems/ModemBrochure.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourgeois, B., Martinez, A., Alleman, P., Cheramie, J., and Gravley, J. 1999. Autonomous bathymetry survey system. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 24, 4, 414--423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Catipovic, J. 1990. Performance limitations in underwater acoustic telemetry. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 15, 3, 205--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. El-Hoiydi, A. and Decotignie, J.-D. 2004. WiseMAC: An ultra low power mac protocol for the downlink of infrastructure wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications. 244--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Floyd, S. and Jacobson, V. 1994. The synchronization of periodic routing messages. ACM/IEEE Trans. Network. 2, 2, 122--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Freitag, L., Grund, M., Singh, S., Partan, J., Koski, P., and Ball, K. 2005. The WHOI Micro-Modem: An acoustic communications and navigation system for multiple platforms. In Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE Oceans Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Girod, L. and Estrin, D. 2001. Robust range estimation using acoustic and multimodal sensing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hammerstad, E., Åsheim, S., Nilsen, K., and Bodhot, H. 1993. Advances in multibeam echo sounder technology. In Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE Oceans Conference. 1482--1487.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Heidemann, J., Ye, W., Wills, J., Syed, A., and Li, Y. 2006. Research challenges and applications for underwater sensor networking. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. 228--235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hertzmann, A. 2004. Introduction to Bayesian learning. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH Course Notes. 22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jaynes, E. T. 2003. Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Knight, W., Pridham, R., and Kay, S. 1981. Digital signal processing for sonar. Proc. IEEE 69, 11, 1451--1506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kuperman, W. A., Hodgkiss, W. S., Song, H. C., Akal, T., Ferla, C., and Jackson, D. R. 1998. Phase conjugation in the ocean: Experimental demonstration of an acoustic time-reversal mirror. Acoust. Soc. Amer. J. 103, 25--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Li, W. and Preisig, J. 2007. Estimation of rapidly time-varying sparse channels. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 32, 4 927--939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Li, Y., Ye, W., and Heidemann, J. 2006. Energy efficient network reconfiguration for mostly-off sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communication and Networks. 527--535.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mirza, D., Lu, F., and Schurgers, C. 2009. TB-MAC: Efficient mac-layer broadcast for underwater acoustic sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP). 249--254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Partan, J., Kurose, J., and Levine, B. N. 2006. A survey of practical issues in underwater networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on UnderWater Networks (WUWNet). 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Polastre, J., Hill, J., and Culler, D. 2004. Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys). 95--107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Preisig, J. 2006. Acoustic propagation considerations for underwater acoustic communications network development. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks (WUWNet). 1--5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Price, R. and Green, P. 1958. A communication technique for multipath channels. Proc. IRE 46, 3, 555--570.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Schurgers, C., Tsiatsis, V., and Srivastava, M. B. 2002. STEM: Topology management for energy efficient sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference. 78--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Song, H.-C., Hodgkiss, W. S., and Kuperman, W. A. 2007. MIMO time reversal communications. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on UnderWater Networks (WUWNet). 5--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Stojanovic, M. 1996. Recent advances in high-speed underwater acoustic communications. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 21, 2, 125--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Stojanovic, M. 2003. Wiley Encyclopedia of Telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chapter Acoustic (underwater) Communications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Stojanovic, M., Catipovic, J., and Proakis, J. 1994. Phase coherent digital communications for underwater acoustic channels. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 19, 1, 100--111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Syed, A., Heidemann, J., and Ye, W. 2010. Managing multipath in underwater acoustic wakeup. In Proceedings IEEE SECON (Poster).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Syed, A., Ye, W., Krishnamachari, B., and Heidemann, J. 2007. Understanding spatio-temporal uncertainty in medium access with aloha protocols. In Proceedings of the Second ACM International Workshop on UnderWater Networks (WUWNet). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Syed, A. A., Ye, W., and Heidemann, J. 2008. T-Lohi: A new class of MAC protocols for underwater acoustic sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Thrun, S. 1998. Bayesian landmark learning for mobile robot localization. Mach. Learn. 33, 1, 41--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Vasilescu, I., Kotay, K., Rus, D., Dunbabin, M., and Corke, P. 2005. Data collection, storage, and retrieval with an underwater sensor network. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys). 154--165. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wills, J., Ye, W., and Heidemann, J. 2006. Low-power acoustic modem for dense underwater sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on UnderWater Networks (WUWNet). 79--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ye, W., Heidemann, J., and Estrin, D. 2004. Medium access control with coordinated adaptive sleeping for wireless sensor networks. ACM/IEEE Trans. Network. 12, 3, 493--506. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Tones for real: Managing multipath in underwater acoustic wakeup

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
        ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 9, Issue 2
        March 2013
        532 pages
        ISSN:1550-4859
        EISSN:1550-4867
        DOI:10.1145/2422966
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 April 2013
        • Accepted: 1 March 2012
        • Revised: 1 December 2011
        • Received: 1 July 2010
        Published in tosn Volume 9, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader