skip to main content
10.1145/2425333.2425386acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicvgipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Real time mosaicing and change detection system

Published:16 December 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

A system capable of demonstrating surveillance of a vast area for target tracking in real time has been a challenging problem and in this paper we present architecture for a real time, mosaicing and change detection system which proves to be an efficient solution for the same. A method of pipelining SURF (Speeded Up Robust Features) has been proposed for performing real time registration to generate panoramic view of a very large scene at far away distances. The pipelined architecture of the proposed system performs the computationally intensive SURF registration over 6 times faster than conventional SURF without any significant compromise in accuracy. The atmospheric turbulence may restrict accurate registration of images therefore a solution has been proposed which performs atmospheric turbulence restoration. Spatial information based object detection and tracking of slow moving objects in the mosaics of large areas is performed which ensures robust and accurate detection of changes in the scene. The proposed system works for large range PTZ cameras with both TI and CCD sensors in real world conditions, with fast panning and vast area of monitoring giving high target detection accuracy. The experimentation has been performed on varied datasets of both CCD and TI sensors and in different environmental conditions for both day and night scenarios. It has been observed from the experimental result that the proposed system outperforms similar systems such as [1, 13, 10] in terms of robustness, ability to handle diverse environments and overall system performance.

References

  1. P. Azzari. An effective real-time mosaicing algorithm apt to detect motion through background subtraction using a ptz camera. In AVSS Conference Proceedings, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Brown and D. Lowe. Automatic panoramic image stitching using invariant features. International Journal of Computer Vision, pages 59--73, May 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Bruzzone and D. Prieto. Automatic analysis of the difference image for unsupervised change detection. In IEEE Transactions on Geosciences and Remote sensing, May 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. E. B. D. Lu, P. Mausel and E. Moran. Change detection techniques. May 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Evans. Notes on the opensurf library. Technical Report CSTR-09-001, January 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. A. Fischler and R. C. Bolles. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. In Communications of the ACM, June 1981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. O. K. Gruen A. and P. Agouris. Automatic extraction of man-made objects from aerial and space images. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Harris and M. Stephans. A combined corner and edge detector. In Fourth Alvey Vision Conference Proceedings, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. T. T. Herbert Bay and L. V. Gool. Surf: speeded up robust features. In ECCV conference proceedings, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J.-S. Hu and T.-M. Su. Robust environmental change detection using ptz camera via spatial-temporal probabilistic modeling. IEEE Transactions on Mechatronics, June 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. L. Juan and O. Gwun. A comparison of sift, pca-sift and surf. IJIP, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. C. S. K. Mikolajczyk. Indexing based on scale invariant interest points. In Proceedings of ICCV, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. S. Kang, J. Paikab, A. Koschana, B. Abidia, and M. A. Abidia. Real time video tracking using ptz cameras. In SPIE Conference Proceedings, pages 103--111, May 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. T. Kasetkasem and P. Varshney. An image change detection algorithm based on markov random field models. In IEEE Transactions on Geosciences and Remote sensing, Aug 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Lalonde, S. Foucher, L. Gagnon, E. Pronovost, M. Derenne, and A. Janelle. A system to automatically track humans and vehicles with a ptz camera. In Proceedings of SPIE, June 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Liu and J. Sun. Parallel graph-cuts by adaptive bottom-up merging. In Proceedings of CVPR, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant key points (sift). IJCV, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. R. B. N. Xu and N. Ahuja. Object segmentation using graph cuts based active contours. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on CVPR, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. R. Radke, S. Andra, O. Al-Kofahi, and B. Roysam. Image change detection algorithms: a systematic survey. In IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. V. Rankov, R. J. Locke, R. J. Edens, P. R. Barber, and B. Vojnovic. An algorithm for image stitching and blending. In Proceedings of SPIE, March 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. E. Rosten and T. Drummond. Machine learning for high-speed corner detection. In Proceedings of ECCV, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. D. Rueckert, L. I. Sonoda, C. Hayes, D. L. G. Hil, M. O. Leach, and D. J. Hawkes. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast mr images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 18(8), Aug 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. M. C. Stefan Leutenegger and R. Y. Siegwart. Brisk: Binary robust invariant scalable keypoints. In ICCV conference proceedings, November 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. H. S. T. Itoh and Y. Watanabe. Motion compensation for isar via centroid tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, July 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. P. M. Xiang Zhu. Removing atmospheric turbulence via space-invariant deconvolution. In IEEE Transactions on PAMI, April 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Real time mosaicing and change detection system

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              ICVGIP '12: Proceedings of the Eighth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing
              December 2012
              633 pages
              ISBN:9781450316606
              DOI:10.1145/2425333

              Copyright © 2012 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 16 December 2012

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate95of286submissions,33%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader