skip to main content
10.1145/2445196.2445252acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Becoming experts: measuring attitude development in introductory computer science

Published:06 March 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We have begun the process of examining how students perceive the field of computer science by employing a novice-to-expert continuum framework. As part of this exploration we have developed and are validating the Computing Attitudes Survey (CAS). In this study, our research focuses on how students develop expert-like attitudes and what effect an introductory course may have on that development. In particular, we find that the CAS instrument can be used to detect pre/post attitude shifts after a single introductory course of instruction and that individual subpopulations show positive attitude gains across gender, area of study and pedagogy Further, the CAS can also be used to identify significant pre/post attitude shifts among individual component factors, groupings of items on the survey that characterize different aspects of novice thought processes.

References

  1. W. K. Adams, K. K. Perkins, N. S. Podolefsky, M. Dubson, N. D. Finkelstein, and C. E. Wieman. A new instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 2(010101): 1-14, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Barbera, W. K. Adams, C. E. Wieman, and K. K. Perkins. Modifying and validating the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey for use in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(10): 1435-1439, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. L. J. Barker, K. Garvin-Doxas, and M. Jackson. Defensive climate in the computer science classroom. In Proc. of SIGCSE '02, pages 43-47, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., expanded edition, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P. Carter. An experience report: On the use of multimedia pre-instruction and just-in-time teaching in a CS1 course. In Proc. of SIGCSE '12:, pages 361-366, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. S. Dweck. Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10):1040-1048, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Elliott Tew, B. Dorn, and O. Schneider. Toward a validated computing attitudes survey. In Proc. of ICER'12, pages 135-142, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Felleisen, R. B. Findler, M. Flatt, and S. Krishnamurthi. How to Design Programs. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2nd edition, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Hammer. Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12(2):151-183, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. D. House. Student motivation and achievement in college chemistry. International Journal of Instructional Media, 21(1):1-11, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. D. House. Student motivation, previous instructional experience, and prior achievement as predictors of performance in college mathematics. International Journal of Instructional Media, 22(2): 157-167, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. C. M. Lewis, K. Yasuhara, and R. E. Anderson. Deciding to major in computer science: A grounded theory of students' self-assessment of ability. In Proc. of ICER'11, pages 3-10, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Margolis and A. Fisher. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. K. K. Perkins, W. K. Adams, S. J. Pollock, N. D. Finkelstein, and C. E. Wieman. Correlating student beliefs with student learning using the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. In Proc. of the 2004 Physics Education Research Conference, pages 61-64, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. K. Semsar, J. K. Knight, G. Birol, and M. K. Smith. The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) for use in biology. Life Sciences Education, 10:268-278, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt. Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Summet, D. Kumar, K. O'Hara, D. Walker, L. Ni, D. Blank, and T. Balch. Personalizing CS1 with robots. In Proc. of SIGCSE '09, pages 433-437, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. C. Valentine, D. L. DuBois, and H. Cooper. The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39(2):111-133, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Becoming experts: measuring attitude development in introductory computer science

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '13: Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
      March 2013
      818 pages
      ISBN:9781450318686
      DOI:10.1145/2445196

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 March 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCSE '13 Paper Acceptance Rate111of293submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024
      SIGCSE Virtual 2024: ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
      November 30 - December 1, 2024
      Virtual Event , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader