Carol Passos
Manoel Mendonça
ABSTRACT
Context: Many theories in health care and business administration seek answers to the fundamental question of why people behave the way they do. The Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) is a theory that focuses on a person's intention to behave a certain way. An intention is a plan or a likelihood that someone will behave in a particular way in specific situations and driven by what is believed -- whether or not they actually do so. Belief is a state of mind that embodies trust and confidence in something. In this context, actions are driven by what is believed, by what is assumed to be true about the world. Objective: Our aim is to study and characterize a belief system by applying TRA to agile software project teams in terms of origins, sources and impacts of beliefs on self-management development practices. Method: An ethnographic case study was conducted. A set of interviews and observations on origins and impacts of beliefs in self-management practices was conducted over years with professionals from different project teams. Results: The results showed the strong influence of past experiences and organizational contexts on self-management practices of agile teams and pointed out some key issues. Thus, this study contribute to an improved understanding on how to apply behavioral theories to study software practices. Conclusion: This study showed that ethnographic methods are quite useful to understand software practice. The study also demonstrated that it is possible to capture and represent a belief system in a software project context.
- Adams, D., Nelson, R., Todd, P. 1992. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2): 227--250. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Aguirre, J., Speer, N. 2000. Examining the relationship between beliefs and goals in teacher practice. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 3 (18): 327--356.Google Scholar
- Ajzen, I, Fishbein, M. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, 1st ed. USA: Prentice Hall (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.).Google Scholar
- Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. 2005. The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes. pp. 173--221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Becker, T., Randall, D., Riegel, C. 1995. The multidimensional view of commitment and the theory of reasoned action: a comparative evaluation. JOM, 21(4): 617--638.Google Scholar
- Cohen, S. 1993. Designing effective self-managing work teams. Proc. of Theory Symposium on Self-Managed Work Teams, Denton, Texas, USA, June.Google Scholar
- Davis, F. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319--340. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Davis F., Venkatesh V. 1996. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(1):19--45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Douglas, N. and Wykowski, T. 2010. From Belief to Knowledge Achieving and Sustaining an Adaptive Culture in Organizations, USA: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Fetterman D. 2010. Ethnography: step-by-step, 3rd ed. USA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Funda SAVASCI-ACIKALIN. 2009. Teacher beliefs and practice in science education. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching 10(1), article 12, June.Google Scholar
- Ghorab, K. 1997. The impact of technology acceptance considerations on system usage, and adopted level of technological sophistication: an empirical investigation. International Journal of information Management 17(4): 249--259. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hennessy, M. 2012. Advancing Reasoned Action Theory (The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science Series), USA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Holden, R., Karsh, B. 2010. The Technology Acceptance Model: its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1): 159--172. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jan, A., Contreras, V. 2011. Technology acceptance model for the use of information technology in universities. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2): 845--851. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kerimoglu, O., Basoglu, N., Daim, T. 2008. Organizational adoption of information technologies: case of enterprise resource planning systems. Journal of High Technology Management Research 19(1): 21--35.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kirkman, B., Rosen, B. 1999. Beyond self-management: antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(1): 58--74.Google Scholar
- Kym, H., Park, W. 1992. The effect of cultural fit/misfit on the productivity and turnover of IS personnel. Proc. of SIGCPR '92, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Limayem, M., Hirt, S., Cheung, C. 2007. How habit limits the predictive power of intention: the case of information systems continuance. MIS Quarterly, 31(4): 705--737. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Iivari, J., Huisman, M. 2007. The relationship between organizational culture and the deployment of systems development methodologies. MIS Quarterly, 31(1): 35--58. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Iivari, J., Iivari, N. 2011. The relationship between organizational culture and the deployment of agile methods. IST-5(53):509--520. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lutters, W. G., Seaman, C. B. Revealing actual documentation usage in software maintenance through war stories. IST 1(49):576--587, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Omar, M., Syed-Abdullah, S., Yasin, A. 2011. The impact of agile approach on software engineering teams. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration., 3(1): 12--17.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Passos, C., Braun, P., Cruzes, D., Mendonça, M. 2011. Analyzing the impact of beliefs in software project practices. Proc. of ESEM'11, Banff-Alberta, Canada, September. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Passos, C., Cruzes, D., Dybå, T., Mendonça, M. 2012. Challenges of applying ethnography to study software practices. Proc. of ESEM'12, Lund, Sweden, September. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peslak, A., Ceccucci, W., Sendall, P. 2011. An empirical study of social networking behavior using theory of reasoned action. Proc. of CONISAR'11, North Carolina, USA, November.Google Scholar
- Randolph, M., Pinkerton, S., Somlai, A., Kelly, J., McAuliffe, T., Gibson, R., Hackl, K. 2009. Seriously mentally Ill women's safer sex behaviors and the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Health Education and Behavior, 36(5): 948--958.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roberto, A., Krieger, J., Katz, M., Goei, R., Jain, P. 2009. Predicting pediatricians' communication with parents about the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine: an application of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Health Communication, 26(4): 303--312.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robinson, H., Sharp, H. 2005. Organisational culture and XP: three case studies. Proc. of ADC'05, Denver, Colorado, USA, July. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schein, E. 1992. Organizational culture and leadership. 2nd ed, USA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
- Sheppard, B., Hartwick, J., Warshaw, P. 1988. The theory of reasoned action: a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research 15(3): 325--343.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Smircich, L. 1983. Concepts of culture and organizational analysis Administratuve Science Quartely, 28(3): 339--358.Google Scholar
- Strode, D., Huff, S., Tretiakov, A. 2009. The impact of organizational culture on agile method use. Proc. of HICSS'09, Waikoloa, Big Island, Hawaii, January. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sutton, S., McVey, D., Glanz, A. 1999. A comparative test of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior in the prediction of condom use intentions in a national sample of english young people. Journal of Health Psychology, 18(1): 72--81.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tolfo, C., Wazlawick, R. 2008. The influence of organizational culture on the adoption of extreme programming. Journal of Systems and Software, IST 11(81): 1955--1967. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tolfo, C., Wazlawick, R., Ferreira, M., Forcellini, F. 2011. Agile methods and organizational culture: reflections about cultural levels. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution. 23(6): 423--441. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vanlandingham, M., Suprasert, S., Grandjean, N., Sittitrai, W. 1995. Two views of risky sexual practices among northern thai males: the health belief model and the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(2): 195--212.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies, Management Science 46(2): 186--204.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wernick, P., Hall, T. 2004. Can Thomas Kuhn's paradigms help us understand software engineering?. European Journal of Information Systems, 13 (3): 235--243. Google ScholarDigital Library
- White, L. 1959. The concept of culture. American Anthropologist, 61(2): 227--251.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Applying theory of reasoned action in the context of software development practices: insights into team intention and behavior
Recommendations
Best managerial practices in agile development
ACM SE '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Southeast Regional ConferenceAgile development has been gaining momentum over the year. It practices are perceived by some to be the best for software development. This work investigates agile best development and managerial practices, specially the benefits for optimizing the ...
Theory of Reasoned Action application for Green Information Technology acceptance
IT professionals have positive intentions towards Green Information Technology (GIT).Extended Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) is in favor of GIT adoption.IT professionals of all sectors have positive intention in GIT adoption.External factors have ...
Introducing Agile Development Practices from the Middle
ECBS '08: Proceedings of the 15th Annual IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer Based SystemsAgile practices are widely discussed as a process that lends itself to green-field development. There is good documentation to support this and books on implementing Agile given a new project. In an organization, implementing Agile from the top down is ...
Comments