skip to main content
10.1145/2462307.2462312acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicpeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Addressing self-management in cloud platforms: a semantic sensor web approach

Published:21 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

As computing systems evolve and mature, they are also expected to grow in size and complexity. With the continuing paradigm shift towards cloud computing, these systems have already reached the stage where the human effort required to maintain them at an operational level is unsupportable. Therefore, the development of appropriate mechanisms for run-time monitoring and adaptation is essential to prevent cloud platforms from quickly dissolving into a non-reliable environment. In this paper we present our approach to enable cloud application platforms with self-managing capabilities. The approach is based on a novel view of cloud platforms as networks of distributed data sources - sensors. Accordingly, we propose utilising techniques from the Sensor Web research community to address the challenge of monitoring and analysing continuously flowing data within cloud platforms in a timely manner.

References

  1. Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A.D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I. and Zaharia, M. 2009. Above the Clouds: A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbieri, D., Braga, D., Ceri, S., Della Valle, E. and Grossniklaus, M. 2010. Stream Reasoning: Where We Got So Far. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on New Forms of Reasoning for the Semantic Web: Scalable and Dynamic (NeFoRS) (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blair, G.S., Coulson, G. and Grace, P. 2004. Research directions in reflective middleware: the Lancaster experience. Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on Adaptive and reflective middleware (New York, NY, USA, 2004), 262--267. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Botts, M., Percivall, G., Reed, C. and Davidson, J. 2008. OGC® sensor web enablement: Overview and high level architecture. GeoSensor networks. (2008), 175--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Brazier, F.M.T., Kephart, J.O., Van Dyke Parunak, H. and Huhns, M.N. 2009. Agents and Service-Oriented Computing for Autonomic Computing: A Research Agenda. IEEE Internet Computing. 13, 3 (Jun. 2009), 82--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Calbimonte, J.-P., Jeung, H., Corcho, O. and Aberer, K. 2012. Enabling Query Technologies for the Semantic Sensor Web. International Journal On Semantic Web and Information Systems. (to appear. 2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Compton, M. et al. 2012. The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web. 17, 0 (Dec. 2012), 25--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dautov, R., Paraskakis, I. and Kourtesis, D. 2012. An ontology-driven approach to self-management in cloud application platforms. Proceedings of the 7th South East European Doctoral Student Conference (DSC 2012) (Thessaloniki, Greece, 2012), 539--550.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Della Valle, E. 2012. Challenges, Approaches, and Solutions in Stream Reasoning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ganek, A.G. and Corbi, T.A. 2003. The dawning of the autonomic computing era. IBM Systems Journal. 42, 1 (2003), 5--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gucola, G. and Margara, A. 2011. Processing Flows of Information: From Data Stream to Complex Event Processing. ACM Computing Surveys. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M. and Rudolph, S. 2009. Foundations of Semantic Web Technologies. CRC Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Horn, P. 2001. Autonomic Computing: IBM's Perspective on the State of Information Technology. Computing Systems. 15, Jan (2001), 1--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Huebscher, M.C. and McCann, J.A. 2008. A survey of autonomic computing-degrees, models, and applications. ACM Comput. Surv. 40, 3 (2008), 1--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. IBM 2012. Bringing Big Data to the Enterprise. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/bigdata.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kephart, J.O. and Walsh, W.E. 2004. An artificial intelligence perspective on autonomic computing policies. Fifth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, 2004. POLICY 2004. Proceedings (Jun. 2004), 3--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Le-Phuoc, D., Dao-Tran, M., Parreira, J.X. and Hauswirth, M. 2011. A native and adaptive approach for unified processing of linked streams and linked data. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on The semantic web - Volume Part I (Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011), 370--388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mell, P. and Grance, T. 2009. The NIST definition of cloud computing. National Institute of Standards and Technology. 53, 6 (2009), 50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Natis, Y.V., Knipp, E., Valdes, R., Cearley, D.W. and Sholler, D. 2009. Who's Who in Application Platforms for Cloud Computing: The Cloud Specialists. Gartner Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Oreizy, P., Gorlick, M.M., Taylor, R.N., Heimhigner, D., Johnson, G., Medvidovic, N., Quilici, A., Rosenblum, D.S. and Wolf, A.L. 1999. An architecture-based approach to self-adaptive software. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications. 14, 3 (Jun. 1999), 54--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Russell, S.J., Norvig, P., Canny, J.F., Malik, J.M. and Edwards, D.D. 1995. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Sheth, A., Henson, C. and Sahoo, S.S. 2008. Semantic sensor web. Internet Computing, IEEE. 12, 4 (2008), 78--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Studer, R., Benjamins, V.R. and Fensel, D. 1998. Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 25, 1--2 (Mar. 1998), 161--197. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Addressing self-management in cloud platforms: a semantic sensor web approach

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                HotTopiCS '13: Proceedings of the 2013 international workshop on Hot topics in cloud services
                April 2013
                94 pages
                ISBN:9781450320511
                DOI:10.1145/2462307

                Copyright © 2013 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 21 April 2013

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                HotTopiCS '13 Paper Acceptance Rate10of15submissions,67%Overall Acceptance Rate10of15submissions,67%

                Upcoming Conference

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader