skip to main content
10.1145/2463372.2463436acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An analytical investigation of block-based mutation operators for order-based stochastic clique covering algorithms

Published:06 July 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We analyze the properties of a recently proposed order-based representation of the NP-hard (vertex) clique covering problem (CCP). In this representation, a permutation of vertices is mapped to a clique covering using greedy clique covering (GCC) and the identified cliques are put into the permutation as blocks. Block-based mutation operators can be then used to improve the clique covering in a stochastic algorithm, which is referred to as iterated greedy (IG). In this paper, we analytically investigate how the block-based mutation operators influence the quality of the solution. We formulate a sufficient condition for an improvement by a block-based operator to occur. We apply it in a proof of polynomial-time convergence of a block-based algorithm on paths. We also discuss the behavior of the algorithm on complements of bipartite graphs, where it can have a spectrum of possible behavior, ranging from polynomial-time convergence to getting stuck in a suboptimal solution. Worst-case result is proven for a graph class, where the algorithm gets stuck in a suboptimal solution with an overwhelming probability.

References

  1. A. Auger and B. Doerr, editors. Theory of Randomized Search Heuristics, volume 1 of Series on Theoretical Computer Science. World Scientific, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Behrisch and A. Taraz. Efficiently covering complex networks with cliques of similar vertices. Theor Comput Sci, 355(1):37--47, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Chalupa. On the efficiency of an order-based representation in the clique covering problem. In T. Soule and J. Moore, editors, Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, GECCO '12, pages 353--360, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. C. Culberson and F. Luo. Exploring the k-colorable landscape with iterated greedy. In D. S. Johnson and M. Trick, editors, Cliques, Coloring and Satisfiability: Second DIMACS Implementation Challenge, pages 245--284. American Mathematical Society, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. T. Friedrich, J. He, N. Hebbinghaus, F. Neumann, and C. Witt. Analyses of simple hybrid algorithms for the vertex cover problem. Evolutionary Comput, 17(1):3--19, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. O. Giel and I. Wegener. Evolutionary algorithms and the maximum matching problem. In H. Alt and M. Habib, editors, STACS 2003: 20th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, volume 2607 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 415--426. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. E. Hopcroft and R. M. Karp. An n5/2 algorithm for maximum matchings in bipartite graphs. SIAM J Comput, 2:225--231, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. M. Karp. Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In R. Miller and J. Thatcher, editors, Proceedings of a Symposium on the Complexity of Computer Computations, pages 85--103. Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. F. Neumann and C. Witt. Bioinspired Computation in Combinatorial Optimization - Algorithms and Their Computational Complexity. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P. S. Oliveto and C. Witt. On the analysis of the simple genetic algorithm. In T. Soule and J. Moore, editors, Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, GECCO '12, pages 1341--1348, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Pattillo, N. Youssef, and S. Butenko. Clique relaxation models in social network analysis. In M. T. Thai and P. M. Pardalos, editors, Handbook of Optimization in Complex Networks, pages 143--162. Springer, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. E. Schaeffer. Graph clustering. Comput Sci Rev, 1(1):27--64, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Sudholt and C. Zarges. Analysis of an iterated local search algorithm for vertex coloring. In O. Cheong, K. Y. Chwa, and K. Park, editors, Algorithms and Computation, volume 6506 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 340--352. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D. J. A. Welsh and M. B. Powell. An upper bound for the chromatic number of a graph and its application to timetabling problems. The Comput J, 10(1):85--86, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. C. Witt. Analysis of an iterated local search algorithm for vertex cover in sparse random graphs. Theor Comput Sci, 425:117--125, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An analytical investigation of block-based mutation operators for order-based stochastic clique covering algorithms

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '13: Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
      July 2013
      1672 pages
      ISBN:9781450319638
      DOI:10.1145/2463372
      • Editor:
      • Christian Blum,
      • General Chair:
      • Enrique Alba

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 July 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      GECCO '13 Paper Acceptance Rate204of570submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      GECCO '24
      Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 14 - 18, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader