skip to main content
research-article

Clinical programming software to manage patient's data with a Cochlear implantat

Published:23 May 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Auditory prostheses (AP) using Cochlear Implant System a.k.a bionic ears are widely used electronic devices that electrically stimulate the auditory nerve using an electrode array, surgically placed in the inner ear for patients suffering from severe to profound senosorineural deafness. The AP mainly contains an external Body Worn Speech Processor (BWSP) and an internal Implantable Receiver Stimulator (IRS). The BWSP receives an external sound or speech and generates encoded speech data bits for transmission to the IRS via a Radio Frequency transcutaneous link to excite the electrode array. After surgical placement of the electrode array in the inner ear, the BWSP should be fine-tuned to achieve the 80 to 100% speech reception abilities of the patient by an audiologist using Clinical Programming Software (CPS). The tuning process involves several tasks such as identifying the active electrode contacts, determining the detection and pain threshold of each active electrode, and loading these values into BWSP by reprogramming the BWSP. The main objective of this paper is to describe a simple personal-computer based, user-friendly CPS, which fine tunes the BWSP to achieve the best possible speech reception abilities of each patient and to perform post-operative fitting procedures by an audiologist. The CPS was developed to perform the post-operative fine tuning procedures such as (i) measurement of electrode tissue impedance, (ii) fitting to determine the hearing threshold and comfort levels for each active electrode, and (iii) reprogramming the speech processor using the identified threshold and comfort values. Finally, experimental results are presented.

References

  1. Soon Kwan An, Se-Ik Park, Sang Beom Jun, Choong Jae Lee, Kyung Min Byun, Jung Hyun Sung, Blake S. Wilson, June 2007, "Design for a Simplified Cochlear Implant System", IEEE Tran Biomedical Engg, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 973--982,DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2007.895372Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Blake S. Wilson and Michael F. Dorman, June 2007, "The Surprising Performance of Present-Day Cochlear Implants", IEEE Tran Biomedical Engg, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 969--973, DOI 10.1109/TBME.2007.893505Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Francis A. Spelman, May/june 1999, " The Past, Present, and Future of cochlear prostheses", IEEE Engineering in Medicine And Biology, vol 18,no.3, pp. 27--33, DOI 10.1109/51.765186 0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Fan-Gang Zeng , 2004 ,"Trends in Cochlear Implants", Trends In Amplification Volume 8, Number 1, pp. T1- T34, DOI: 10.1177/108471380400800102Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P. Loizou, 1998,"Mimicking the Human Ear: An overview of signal processing techniques used for cochlear implants," IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 15(5), 101--130, DOI 10.1109/79.708543Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mark W. White, Michael M. Merzenich and John N. Gardi, "Multichannel Cochlear Implants Channel Interactions and Processor Design", Arch Otolaryngol-Vol 110. Aug 1984,pp 593--501, http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/110/8/493Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Graeme M. Clark, "The multiple-channel cochlear implant: the interface between sound and the central nervous system for hearing, speech, and language in deaf people--a personal perspective ",Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, vol 361, pp. 791--810, February,2006, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2005.1782Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Blake S. Wilson, Charles C. Finley, Dewey T. Lawson, Robert D. WolfordS, Donald K. Eddington & William M. Rabinowitzs, "Better speech recognition with cochlear implants", NATURE . VOL 352. 18 MAY 1991, DOI:10.1038/352236a0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. K. Raja Kumar and P. Seetha Ramaiah, "DSP and Microcontroller based Speech Processor for Auditory Prosthesis", Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication, ADCOM-2006, Advanced Computing and Communications Society - Bangalore and National Institute of Technology, Surathkal, INDIA, Dec.20-23, 2006, pp. 518--522.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. K. Raja Kumar and P. Seetha Ramaiah, "Programmable Digital Speech Processor for Auditory Prostheses", Proceedings of IEEE International Region-10 Conference on Innovative Technologies for Societal Transformation -- TENCON, 2008, November 18 - 21, 2008, Hyderabad, IndiaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. K. Raja Kumar and P. Seetha Ramaiah, "Development of Receiver Stimulator for Auditory Prosthesis", International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 7, Issue 3, No 2, May 2010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K. Raja Kumar and P. Seetha Ramaiah, "Microcontroller Based Receiver Stimulator for Auditory Prosthesis", Proceedings of IEEE International Region-10 Conference on Innovative Technologies for Social Transformation -- TENCON, 2008, November 18 - 21, 2008, Hyderabad, INDIAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. K. Rajakumar and P. Seetha Ramaiah, "Personal Computer Based Clinical Programming Software for Auditory Prostheses", Journal of Computer Science, Vol 5. No. 8, pp. 589--595, 2009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. C. Bourgeois-Republique, Bruno Frachet, " Using Interactive evolutionary algorithms to help fitting a cochlea implant", proceeding of GECCO'05,June 25-29 ,Washington DC, USA, pp. 133--139. DOI:10.1145/1102256.1102287 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Zied Chotouri, Jaouhar Mouine and Rejan Fonatine, "An advanced software tool for evaluation and rehabilitation of cochlear prosthesis users. Proceeding of the 22nd Annual EMBS International conference, July 23-28, 2000, Chicago IL, pp. 1566--1569. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2000.898042.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gabriella Tognloa, Sandro Burdo, Mara Caponio, Michele Norgia , "Measurement of Electrode Current Pulses from Cochlear Implants", IEEE Tran Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 53,No#5, pp. 2105--2112,Oct 2005. DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2005.855120Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Saunders E, Cohen L, Aschendorff A, Shapiro W, Knight M, Stecker M, et al. Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrode modiolar distance. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 28_/40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Manuel Sainz, Angel de la Torre, Cristina Roldin etc., "Analysis of programming maps and its application for balancing multichannel cochlear implants", International journal of audiology, 42, 2003, pp. 43--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. P.R. DEMAN, K. DAEMERS, M. YPERMAN, F. E. OFFECIERS, A. PLASMANS, B. VAN DIJK and P. J. GOVAERTS, "Basic Fitting and Evaluation Parameters of a Newly Designed Cochlear Implant Electrode", Acta Otolaryngol 124, 2004, pp. 281--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Clinical programming software to manage patient's data with a Cochlear implantat

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader