skip to main content
10.1145/2468356.2468403acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Using an intelligent interviewer to perform cognitive assessments

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVAs) are computer systems that have specifically designed capabilities ranging from simple conversation agents to complex systems that can accomplish activities on our behalf. As a result, state of the art Computerized Conversation Agents (CCAs) have been developed to have a fluid dialog with humans using natural language, offering advanced intelligent tutors, museum guides, and virtual patients. These CCAs monitor the user's interactions and build a user model in order to adjust current and future interactions to meet the needs of the individual user. We explore using an Intelligent Interviewer to conduct a cognitive assessment of a user. The results could be offered to existing CCAs allowing the interaction to be individualized from the initial point of interaction. In addition, educators, psychologists and medical professions can replace existing methods of conducting cognitive assessments with an Intelligent Interviewer.

References

  1. Bickmore, T., Puskar, K., Schlenk, E., Pfeifer, L., & Sereika, S. Maintaining Reality: Relational Agents for Antipsychotic Medication Adherence. Interacting with Computers special issue on Mental Health 22(4), (2010), 276--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D'Mello, S. K., Graesser, A. C., & King, B. Toward spoken human-computer tutorial dialogues. Human Computer Interaction, 25(4), (2010), 289--323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K.. Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering Education, 78, (1988 -- Reprint 2002) 674--681.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. Applications, Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles. Int. J. Engng Ed., 21(1), (2005), 103--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ford T., Last, A., Henley, W., Norman, S., Guglani, S., Kelesidi K., Martin, A., Moran, P., Latham-Cork, H., Goodman, R. Can standardized diagnostic assessment be a useful adjunct to clinical assessment in child mental health services? A randomized controlled trial of disclosure of the Development and Well-Being Assessment to practitioners Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Graesser, A. C., Britt, A., Millis,K., Wallace,P., Halpern, D., Cai, Z., Kopp, K. & Forsyth, C. Critiquing media reports with flawed scientific findings: Operation ARIES!, a game with animated agents and natural language trialogues. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6095, (2010), 327329. London: Springer Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Graesser, A. C., Rus, V., D'Mello, S. K., & Jackson, G. T. AutoTutor: Learning through natural language dialogue that adapts to the cognitive and affective states of the learner. In Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning. Information Age Publishing (2008), 95125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Graesser, A.C. Learning, thinking, and emoting with discourse technologies. American Psychologist, 66, (2011), 743--757.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Lane, H., Noren, D., Auerbach, D., Birch, M. & Swartout, W. Intelligent Tutoring Goes to the Museum in the Big City: A Pedagogical Agent for Informal Science Education. In 15th Int'l Conf on AI in Ed. (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Litzinger, Thomas A., Sangha, Lee, J. C., Wise, R. F. A Psychometric Study of the Index of Learning Styles. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), (2007), 309--319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Rizzo, A., Lange, B., Buckwalter, J., Forbell, E., Kim, J., Sagae, K., Williams, J., Rothbaum, B., Difede, J., Reger, G., Parsons, T., & Kenny, P. An Intelligent Virtual Human System for Providing Healthcare Information and Support. In Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, 18, (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rizzo, A., Parsons, T., Buckwalter, J., & Kenny, P. A New Generation of Intelligent Virtual Patients for Clinical Training. In Proceedings of IEEE VR Conf. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Science, C. EVA: expressive multipart virtual agent performing gestures and emotions. International Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 5(1), (2011), 36--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Velicer, W., Bickmore, T., Blissmer, B., Redding, C., Johnson, J., Meier, J., & Zaffini, J. Relational Agent Interventions for Multiple Risk Factors: Demonstration and Initial Results. Psychology & Health, 24, (2009), 403Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using an intelligent interviewer to perform cognitive assessments

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3360 pages
      ISBN:9781450319522
      DOI:10.1145/2468356

      Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '13 Paper Acceptance Rate630of1,963submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader