skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466466acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Privacy as part of the app decision-making process

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smartphones have unprecedented access to sensitive personal information. While users report having privacy concerns, they may not actively consider privacy while downloading apps from smartphone application marketplaces. Currently, Android users have only the Android permissions display, which appears after they have selected an app to download, to help them understand how applications access their information. We investigate how permissions and privacy could play a more active role in app-selection decisions. We designed a short "Privacy Facts' display, which we tested in a 20-participant lab study and a 366-participant online experiment. We found that by bringing privacy information to the user when they were making the decision and by presenting it in a clearer fashion, we could assist users in choosing applications that request fewer permissions.

References

  1. Au, K., Zhou, Y., Huang, Z., Gill, P., and Lie, D. Short paper: a look at smartphone permission models. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on Security and privacy in smartphones and mobile devices (SPSM '11) (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barrera, B., Kayacik, H., van Oorschot, P., and Somayaji, A. A methodology for empirical analysis of permission-based security models and its application to android. In In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer and communications security (CCS '10) (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barrera, D., Clark, J., McCarney, D., and van Oorschot, P. C. Understanding and improving app installation security mechanisms through empirical analysis of android. In 2nd Annual ACM CCS Workshop on Security and Privacy in Smartphones and Mobile Devices (SPSM) (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Egelman, S., Tsai, J., Cranor, L., and Acquisti, A. Timing is everything?: the effects of timing and placement of online privacy indicators. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2009), 319--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Enck, W., Gilbert, P., Chun, B., Cox, L., Jung, J., McDaniel, P., and Sheth, A. Taintdroid: an information-flow tracking system for realtime privacy monitoring on smartphones. In In Proceedings of the 9th USENIX conference on Operating systems design and implementation (OSDI'10) (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Felt, A., Chin, E., Hanna, S., Song, D., and Wagner, D. Android permissions demystified. In In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Computer and communications security (CCS '11) (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Felt, A. P., Egelman, S., Finifter, M., Akhawe, D., and Wagner, D. How to ask for permission. In USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Security (HotSec) 2012 (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Felt, A. P., Egelman, S., and Wagner, D. I've got 99 problems, but vibration ain't one: A survey of smartphone users' concerns. In 2nd Annual ACM CCS Workshop on Security and Privacy in Smartphones and Mobile Devices (SPSM) (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Felt, A. P., Ha, E., Egelman, S., Haney, A., Chin, E., and Wagner, D. Android permissions: User attention, comprehension, and behavior. In Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) 2012 (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Good, N., Dhamija, R., Grossklags, J., Thaw, D., Aronowitz, S., Mulligan, D., and Konstan, J. Stopping spyware at the gate: A user study of privacy, notice and spyware. In In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 05) (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Juniper Networks. Mobile malware development continues to rise, android leads the way, 2011. http://globalthreatcenter.com/?p=2492.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kelley, P., Consolvo, S., Cranor, L., Jung, J., Sadeh, N., and Wetherall, D. A conundrum of permissions: Installing applications on an android smartphone. In Financial Cryptography and Data Security, vol. 7398. 2012, 68--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kelley, P. G., Bresee, J., Cranor, L. F., and Reeder, R. W. A "Nutrition Label" for Privacy. In Proceedings of the 2009 Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. King, J. "How come i'm allowing strangers to go through my phone?" Smartphones and privacy expectations, 2013. http://jenking.net/mobile/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kleimann Communication Group Inc. Evolution of a prototype financial privacy notice., February 2006. http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/privacyinitiatives/ftcfinalreport060228.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Labs, M. Mcafee threats report: Third quarter 2011, 2011. http://www.mcafee.com/us/resources/reports/rpquarterly-threat-q3-2011.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lin, J., Sadeh, N., Amini, S., Lindqvist, J., Hong, J. I., and Zhang, J. Expectation and purpose: understanding users' mental models of mobile app privacy through crowdsourcing. UbiComp '12, ACM (2012), 501--510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lockheimer, H. Android and security, 2012. http://googlemobile.blogspot.com/2012/02/android-and-security.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lunden, I. Google play about to pass 15 billion app downloads? pssht! it did that weeks ago, 2012. http://techcrunch.com/2012/05/07/google-play-about-to-pass15-billion-downloads-pssht-it-did-that-weeks-ago/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Namestnikov, Y. It threat evolution: Q3 2011, 2011. http://www.securelist.com/en/analysis/204792201/IT_Threat_Evolution_Q3_2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rashid, F. Y. Black hat: Researchers find way to "bounce" malware into google app store, 2012. http://www.scmagazine.com/blackhat-researchers-find-way-to-bounce-malware-intogoogle-app-store/article/252098/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Smetters, D., and Good, N. How users use access control. In In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 09) (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Staddon, J., Huffaker, D., Brown, L., and Sedley, A. Are privacy concerns a turn-off? engagement and privacy in social networks. In Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Stevens, G., and Wulf, V. Computer-supported access control. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 16, 3 (Sept. 2009), 12:1--12:26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Vidas, T., Christin, N., and Cranor, L. F. Curbing android permission creep. In W2SP 2011 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Privacy as part of the app decision-making process

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader