skip to main content
10.1145/2480362.2480415acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Heterogeneous data fusion via matrix factorization for augmenting item, group and friend recommendations

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 March 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Up to now, more and more social media sites have started to allow their users to build the social relationships. Take the Last.fm for example (which is a popular music-sharing site), users can not only add each other as friends, but also join interest groups that include people with common tastes. Therefore, in this environment, users might be interested in not only receiving item recommendations, but also friend recommendations whom they might consider putting in the contact list, and group recommendations that they may consider joining in. To support such needs, in this paper, we propose a generalized framework that provides three different types of recommendation in a single system: recommending items, recommending groups and recommending friends. For each type of recommendation, we in depth investigated the algorithm impact of fusing other two information resources (e.g., user-item preferences and friendship to be fused for recommending groups), along with their combined effect. The experiment reveals the ideal fusion mechanism for this multi-output recommender, and validates the benefit of factorization model for fusing bipartite data (such as membership and user-item preferences) and the benefit of regularization model for fusing one mode data (such as friendship). Moreover, the positive effect of integrating similarity measure into the regularization model is identified via the experiment.

References

  1. L. Backstrom and J. Leskovec. Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks. In Proc. WSDM '11, pages 635--644, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Chen, W. Geyer, C. Dugan, M. Muller, and I. Guy. Make new friends, but keep the old: recommending people on social networking sites. In Proc. CHI '09, pages 201--210. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. W.-Y. Chen, J.-C. Chu, J. Luan, H. Bai, Y. Wang, and E. Y. Chang. Collaborative filtering for orkut communities: discovery of user latent behavior. In Proc. WWW '09, pages 681--690. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. I. Guy, I. Ronen, and E. Wilcox. Do you know?: recommending people to invite into your social network. In Proc. IUI '09, pages 77--86. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Y. Hu, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In Proc. ICDM '08, pages 263--272. IEEE Computer Society, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Jamali and M. Ester. A matrix factorization technique with trust propagation for recommendation in social networks. In Proc. RecSys '10, pages 135--142. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Jamali, T. Huang, and M. Ester. A generalized stochastic block model for recommendation in social rating networks. In Proc. RecSys '11, pages 53--60. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. I. Konstas, V. Stathopoulos, and J. M. Jose. On social networks and collaborative recommendation. In Proc. SIGIR '09, pages 195--202. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. Ma, D. Zhou, C. Liu, M. R. Lyu, and I. King. Recommender systems with social regularization. In Proc. WSDM '11, pages 287--296. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P. Symeonidis, E. Tiakas, and Y. Manolopoulos. Transitive node similarity for link prediction in social networks with positive and negative links. In Proc. RecSys '10, pages 183--190. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. V. Vasuki, N. Natarajan, Z. Lu, and I. S. Dhillon. Affiliation recommendation using auxiliary networks. In Proc. RecSys '10, pages 103--110. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S.-H. Yang, B. Long, A. Smola, N. Sadagopan, Z. Zheng, and H. Zha. Like like alike: joint friendship and interest propagation in social networks. In Proc. WWW '11, pages 537--546. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Q. Yuan, L. Chen, and S. Zhao. Factorization vs. regularization: fusing heterogeneous social relationships in top-n recommendation. In Proc. RecSys '11, pages 245--252. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Heterogeneous data fusion via matrix factorization for augmenting item, group and friend recommendations

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '13: Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
        March 2013
        2124 pages
        ISBN:9781450316569
        DOI:10.1145/2480362

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 March 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SAC '13 Paper Acceptance Rate255of1,063submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader