skip to main content
10.1145/2481449.2481469acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswipsceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Grand challenges for the UK: upskilling teachers to teach computer science within the secondary curriculum

Published:08 November 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent changes in UK education policy with respect to ICT and Computer Science (CS) have meant that more teachers need the skills and knowledge to teach CS in schools. This paper reports on work in progress in the UK researching models of continuing professional development (CPD) for such teachers. We work with many teachers who either do not have an appropriate academic background to teach Computer Science, or who do and have not utilised it in the classroom due to the curriculum in place for the last fifteen years. In this paper we outline how educational policy changes are affecting teachers in the area of ICT and Computer Science; we describe a range of models of CPD and discuss the role that local and national initiatives can play in developing a hybrid model of transformational CPD, briefly reporting on our initial findings to date.

References

  1. M. Armoni. Looking at secondary teacher preparation through the lens of computer science. Trans.Comput.Educ., 11(4):23:1--23:38, nov 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. Bell and J. Gilbert. Teacher development: a model from science education. Falmer Press, London, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Cordingley, M. Bell, B. Rundell, and D. Evans. The impact of collaborative CPD on classroom teaching and learning: how does collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) for teachers of the 5-16 age range affect teaching and learning? Technical report, Social Research Unit, Institute of Education, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. T. Crick and S. Sentance. Computing at school: Stimulating Computing Education in the UK. In Proceedings of the 11th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling '11, pages 122--123, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Department for Education and Skills. National framework for mentoring and coaching. Technical report, CUREE, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Fraser, A. Kennedy, L. Reid, and L. McKinney. Teachers' continuing professional development: contested concepts, understanding and models. Journal of In-Service Education, 33(22):153--169, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. T. R. Guskey. Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3):381--391, 08/01; 2012/06 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. B. Joyce and B. Showers. The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6):12--16, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Kennedy. Models of continuing professional development: a framework for analysis. Journal of In-Service Education, 31(2):235--250, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. K. Lipowski, D. Jorde, M. Prenzel, and T. Seidel. Expert views on the implementation of teacher professional development in European countries. Professional Development in Education, 37(5):685--700, 11/01; 2012/06 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ofsted. The logical chain: continuing professional development in effective schools. Technical report, Ofsted, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. V. D. Opfer. The lost promise of teacher professional development in England. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1):3--24, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. E. Schmidt. Eric Schmidt's MacTaggart lecture - full text, Friday 26th August 2011 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. The Royal Society. Shut Down or Restart? The way forward for Computing in UK Schools. Technical Report January 2012, DES 2448, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. E. Wenger. Communities of Practice and Learning Systems. Organization, 7(2):225--246, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Grand challenges for the UK: upskilling teachers to teach computer science within the secondary curriculum

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WiPSCE '12: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education
        November 2012
        168 pages
        ISBN:9781450317870
        DOI:10.1145/2481449

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 November 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        WiPSCE '12 Paper Acceptance Rate9of28submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate104of279submissions,37%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader