skip to main content
10.1145/2487788.2488108acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Location extraction from disaster-related microblogs

Published:13 May 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Location information is critical to understanding the impact of a disaster, including where the damage is, where people need assistance and where help is available. We investigate the feasibility of applying Named Entity Recognizers to extract locations from microblogs, at the level of both geo-location and point-of-interest. Our experimental results show that such tools once retrained on microblog data have great potential to detect the where information, even at the granularity of point-of-interest.

References

  1. J. Finkel, T. Grenager, and C. Mannin. Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by Gibbs sampling. In Proc. of ACL, pages 363--370, Stroudsburg, PA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Gelernter and N. Mushegian. Geo-parsing messages from microtext. Transactions in GIS, 15 (6): 753--773, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Y. Ikawa, M. Enoki, and M. Tatsubori. Location inference using microblog messages. In Proc. of WWW Companion, pages 687--690, Lyon, France, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Karimi and J. Yin. Microtext annotation. Technical Report EP13703, CSIRO, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Kinsella, V. Murdock, and N. O'Hare. "I'm eating a sandwich in Glasgow": Modeling locations with tweets. In Proc. of SMUC Workshop, pages 61--68, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Lafferty, A. McCallum, and F. Pereira. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proc. of ICML, pages 282--289, Williamstown, MA, June-July 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Li, J. Weng, Q. He, Y. Yao, A. Datta, A. Sun, and B.-S. Lee. TwiNER: Named entity recognition in targeted Twitter stream. In Proc. of SIGIR, pages 721--730, Portland, Oregon, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. W. Li, P. Serdyukov, A. de Vries, C. Eickhoff, and M. Larson. The where in the tweet. In Proc. of CIKM, pages 2473--2476, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Mahmud, J. Nichols, and C. Drews. Where is this tweet from? Inferring home location of Twitter users. In Proc. of ICWSM, pages 511--514, Dublin, Ireland, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. D. Ramage, D. Hall, R. Nallapati, and C. Manning. Labeled LDA: A supervised topic model for credit attribution in multi-labeled corpora. In Proc. of EMNLP, pages 248--256, Stroudsburg, PA, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Ritter, S. Clark, Mausam, and O. Etzioni. Named entity recognition in tweets: An experimental study. In Proc. of EMNLP, pages 1524--1534, Edinburgh, UK, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Sankaranarayanan, H. Samet, B. Teitler, M. Lieberman, and J. Sperling. TwitterStand: news in tweets. In Proc. of SIGSPATIAL GIS, pages 42--51, Seattle, WA, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Location extraction from disaster-related microblogs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '13 Companion: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web
      May 2013
      1636 pages
      ISBN:9781450320382
      DOI:10.1145/2487788

      Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2).

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 May 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      WWW '13 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate831of1,250submissions,66%Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader