skip to main content
10.1145/2491411.2491424acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Prediction of atomic web services reliability based on k-means clustering

Published:18 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Contemporary web applications are often designed as composite services built by coordinating atomic services with the aim of providing the appropriate functionality. Although functional properties of each atomic service assure correct functionality of the entire application, nonfunctional properties such as availability, reliability, or security might significantly influence the user-perceived quality of the application. In this paper, we present CLUS, a model for reliability prediction of atomic web services that improves state-of-the-art approaches used in modern recommendation systems. CLUS predicts the reliability for the ongoing service invocation using the data collected from previous invocations. We improve the accuracy of the current state-of-the-art prediction models by considering user-, service- and environment-specific parameters of the invocation context. To address the computational performance related to scalability issues, we aggregate the available previous invocation data using K-means clustering algorithm. We evaluated our model by conducting experiments on services deployed in different regions of the Amazon cloud. The evaluation results suggest that our model improves both performance and accuracy of the prediction when compared to the current state-of-the-art models.

References

  1. D. Krafzig, K. Banke, and D. Slama, Enterprise SOA: Service-Oriented Architecture Best Practices (The Coad Series). Prentice Hall PTR, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Sinisa, S. Dejan, and S. Daniel, “Programming language design for event-driven service composition.,” AUTOMATIKA, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. T. Yu, Y. Zhang, and K.-J. Lin, “Efficient algorithms for web services selection with end-to-end qos constraints,” ACM Trans. Web, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Avizienis, J.-C. Laprie, B. Randell, and C. Landwehr, “Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing,” Dependable and Secure Computing, IEEE Transactions on, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. Zeng, B. Benatallah, A. Ngu, M. Dumas, J. Kalagnanam, and H. Chang, “Qos-aware middleware for web services composition,” Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Wang and S. T. KISHOR, “Modeling user-perceived reliability based on user behavior graphs,” International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. V. Cortellessa and V. Grassi, “Reliability modeling and analysis of service-oriented architectures,” pp. 339–362.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. R. Lyu, ed., Handbook of software reliability engineering. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. L. Cheung, L. Golubchik, and F. Sha, “A study of web services performance prediction: A client’s perspective,” in Modeling, Analysis & Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS), 2011 IEEE 19th International Symposium on, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. S. Breese, D. Heckerman, and C. Kadie, “Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering,” in Conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl, “Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms,” in International conference on World Wide Web, ACM, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Z. Zheng, H. Ma, M. R. Lyu, and I. King, “Qos-aware web service recommendation by collaborative filtering,” IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Z. Zheng and M. R. Lyu, “Collaborative reliability prediction of service-oriented systems,” in ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 1, ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. X. Su and T. M. Khoshgoftaar, “A survey of collaborative filtering techniques,” Adv. in Artif. Intell., vol. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Y. Wang, W. M. Lively, and D. B. Simmons, “Web software traffic characteristics and failure prediction model selection,” J. Comp. Methods in Sci. and Eng., 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. N. B. Mabrouk, S. Beauche, E. Kuznetsova, N. Georgantas, and V. Issarny, “Qos-aware service composition in dynamic service oriented environments,” in ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Conference on Middleware, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Z. Zheng, Y. Zhang, and M. Lyu, “Distributed qos evaluation for real-world web services,” in Web Services (ICWS), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. D. Musa, A. Iannino, and K. Okumoto, Software reliability: measurement, prediction, application (professional ed.). McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Z. Jelinski and P. Moranda., “Software reliability research.,” in Statistical Methods for the Evaluation of Computer System Performance, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. M. R. Lyu, “Software reliability engineering: A roadmap,” in 2007 Future of Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Society, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. L. H. Putnam and W. Myers, Measures for Excellence: Reliable Software on Time, within Budget. Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. A. Abdel-Ghaly, P. Y. Chan, and B. Littlewood, “Evaluation of competing software reliability predictions,” IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. L. Cheung, R. Roshandel, N. Medvidovic, and L. Golubchik, “Early prediction of software component reliability,” in International conference on Software engineering, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. L. Cheung, I. Krka, L. Golubchik, and N. Medvidovic, “Architecture-level reliability prediction of concurrent systems,” in WOSP/SIPEW international conference on Performance Engineering, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. B. Zhou, K. Yin, S. Zhang, H. Jiang, and A. J. Kavs, “A tree-based reliability model for composite web service with common-cause failures,” in International conference on Advances in Grid and Pervasive Computing, Springer-Verlag, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. V. Grassi and S. Patella, “Reliability prediction for service-oriented computing environments,” IEEE Internet Computing, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. W. T. Tsai, D. Zhang, Y. Chen, H. Huang, R. Paul, and N. Liao, “A software reliability model for web services,” in International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. J. Ma and H.-p. Chen, “A reliability evaluation framework on composite web service,” in IEEE International Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering, IEEE Computer Society, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. F. Mahdian, V. Rafe, R. Rafeh, and A. T. Rahmani, “Modeling fault tolerant services in service-oriented architecture,” in IEEE International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering 2009, IEEE Computer Society, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. B. Li, X. Fan, Y. Zhou, and Z. Su, “Evaluating the reliability of web services based on bpel code structure analysis and run-time information capture,” in Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference 2010, IEEE Computer Society, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. L. Coppolino, L. Romano, and V. Vianello, “Security engineering of soa applications via reliability patterns.,” JSEA, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. A. S. Das, M. Datar, A. Garg, and S. Rajaram, “Google news personalization: scalable online collaborative filtering,” in International conference on World Wide Web, ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. H. Guan, H. Li, and M. Guo, “Semi-sparse algorithm based on multi-layer optimization for recommendation system,” in International Workshop on Programming Models and Applications for Multicores and Manycores, ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. C. Wei, W. Hsu, and M. L. Lee, “A unified framework for recommendations based on quaternary semantic analysis,” in ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval, ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. R. Burke, “Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments,” User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. H. Ma, I. King, and M. R. Lyu, “Effective missing data prediction for collaborative filtering,” in ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. M. Silic, G. Delac, I. Krka, and S. Srbljic, “Scalable and accurate prediction of availability of atomic web services,” IEEE Transactions on Services Computing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Y. Baryshnikov, E. Coffman, G. Pierre, D. Rubenstein, M. Squillante, and T. Yimwadsana, “Predictability of web-server traffic congestion,” Web Content Caching and Distribution, International Workshop on, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. M. Andreolini and S. Casolari, “Load prediction models in web-based systems,” in International conference on Performance evaluation methodolgies and tools, ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. W.-L. Wang, D. Pan, and M.-H. Chen, “Architecture-based software reliability modeling,” J. Syst. Softw., 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. S. software, “Loadui.” http://www.loadui.org/, 2012. Open source load and stress testing tool.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. A. Vattani, “k-means requires exponentially many iterations even in the plane,” in 25th annual symposium on Computational geometry, ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Prediction of atomic web services reliability based on k-means clustering

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              ESEC/FSE 2013: Proceedings of the 2013 9th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering
              August 2013
              738 pages
              ISBN:9781450322379
              DOI:10.1145/2491411

              Copyright © 2013 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 18 August 2013

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate112of543submissions,21%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader